Well, I don't think we need much more unsuccessful reports as there have been already plenty of them ... but if ya want, here's another one which I've compiled after literally days spent on all this... still can't wait for detailed reports from those who have been at least partially successful with CDT and compare them with my experience

System:
  • CPU: E6600 B2 stepping
  • Mobo: Asus P5K-E unmodded
  • RAM: 2x1Gb Corsair 6400C3 (spd 3-4-3-9)
  • Video: Asus X850XT (no drivers installed )
  • HDD: WD 20Gb IDE for system, Samsung T166 500Gb for pagefile/Superpi
  • Cooling: all air
  • OS: WinXP SP2


Tweaks:
  • OPB registry stuff (LSC, Prefetcher, Throttledualcore etc)
  • Maxmem=600
  • Pagefile=512Mb fixed
  • no ERAM
  • Services: all disabled/manual except RPC, Plug&Play & Themes (for Luna Silver)
  • Priority=high from task manager
  • Copywaza=CDT file (3x632Mb rared, have this from CDT testing ) 3x times copy on itself in Superpi folder (you'll see it later in the pictures)...


The system layout is 2 partitions: C:\ (system) and F:\, pagefile of 512Mb exactly on F:\, Superpi folder on F:\ and copywaza (CDT) folder on F:\ as well, nothing more there.

Most of the services disabled:



Taskmanager at fresh boot:



Taskmanager processes on fresh boot:



How the CDT file does look like (exactly 3x632Mb):



Before running stock 32M:



Stock 32M : 13m20.047s (default boot subtimings ):



Copywaza my way (copy of the big cdt file on itself in superpi folder, you can see the *.bat file used for that)

Taskmanager before the run:



Result: 13m12.312s



Now on to the CDT how it was described (like elmor & KTE @ XS were doing, again, I'm using a *.bat file for that, check it to see the copy sequence):
How the taskmanager looks after the tweak:



The result, though, is slower than the copywaza I did 13m13.859s



Now I tried a little different thing as well (from the pictures of applying the CDT tweak which were posted at the beginning of this thread), and managed to achieve very close balance :



The result is half a second better than previously (which indicates that memory balance has to do something with 32M times, indeed ), however, it still is a second slower than my copywaza run 13m13.484s :



What can I add... running the original CDT 5times in a row raises the available memory and system cache by additional 10 Mb for me (can even achieve 569/571 balance in my case), however, for me this never translated to better 32M times.

KTE, I just switched my bench HDD to a faster one, hope I'll be able to give you a run with the timings you asked soon