That's 108% scaling. Its incorrect because you're not working out percentages here, but percentage change. The formula is as follows
Maths:
http://www.gcseguide.co.uk/percentages.htm
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/63055.html
New - Old / Old x 100 = Percentage Change
For single channel it's 39.750s for dual channel its what you said: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...22&postcount=1Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss
For simplicity, we swap the top figures around or it would become a minus change this time because of importance is decreasing values, not increasing (which is practically untrue i.e. to us 7 sec dropped is not 7 disadvantage but 7 advantage). The base always stays the same as its "new" relative to "old". What matters is the change.
38.968s - 32.672s (change) / 38.968s (relative to old) x 100 (percentage) = 16.157%
If you use that first general formula it would be -16.157% change which is perfectly true from the original time. But to us that's a +16.157% performance gain.
Now we can use a simple percentage formula:
16.157 / 20 x 100 = 80.8% scaling.




Reply With Quote
Bookmarks