I think you guys misunderstood me....take a look at my avg. fps. @ 2fps, your opteron beats my octals![]()
I think you guys misunderstood me....take a look at my avg. fps. @ 2fps, your opteron beats my octals![]()
Rgr that Phil,in dual core rigs,mark06 CPU tests crawl around 0.5-0.8fps,so Steven's octo rig is mighty fine in around 2fps
![]()
3800 X2s OC nice.
http://www.1cup1coffee.com - Play flash games in school
nvm, i feel stupid...
Last edited by cky2k6; 09-27-2007 at 01:30 PM.
Core i7 920 3849B028 4.2ghz cooled by ek hf | 6gb stt ddr3 2100 | MSI HD6950 cf cooled by ek fc | Evga x58 e760 Classified | 120gb G.Skill Phoenix Pro | Modded Rocketfish case + 1200w toughpower | mcp 655 pump + mcr 320 + black ice pro II
For comparison my X2 5600+ CPU score @3174MHz is 2402.
CPU1 - Red Valley 0.755 FPS
CPU2 - Red Valley 1.222 FPS
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
Here's a couple woodcrest numbers if they help comparison for you at all steve
2x 5120 @ 7x402.5 (2.817ghz)
4x 1gb FB-DIMM
X1900GT 648/900
3d06 cpu score: 4403
test 1: 1.458fps
test 2: 2.127fps
Thats all I can get out of them at the moment.. but there's a bag of dry ice in my freezer![]()
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
So Penryn on X38 and SkullTrial boards gets:
3DM 06 (CPU)
1x QC 3GHz (1333FSB) : 4569 (unreleased part)
2x QC 3.4GHz (1600FSB) : 6359 (unreleased part)
1x QC 4.14GHz (1840FSB) : 7000 (Kinc)
1x QC 5.2GHz (1600FSB) : 8092 (Kinc)
2x K10 2GHz : 4242
According to Intel at IDF. Not bad, not bad at all.
Thanks s7. Must be a good workout![]()
Last edited by KTE; 09-27-2007 at 09:03 PM.
s7e9h3n, gracias
can you run tests with only one cpu installed? it's not very hard to temporarily remove second cpu from socket (and its memory modules)
PS see my post http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=743
Last edited by MAS; 09-27-2007 at 08:12 PM.
The CPU score is pretty good actually, almost doubled up on my X2@2.95Ghz, which is pretty good considering the 950mhz disadvantage, so even assuming that quad cores double performance, thats quite the clock per clock advantage.
They almost match up with Stevil's dual woodcrests at 2.8 which again suggests a sizeable clock/clock advantage. I would love to see some oced numbers on these chips.
Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P//Dell Latitude D620
Phenom II BE 940//Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz
2x2GB OCZ Reaper//1GB PC5400
640GB WD Blue//80gb 7200 rpm hdd
Radeon 4850//Geforce 7300 Go
Oh wow, I don't know how I missed that, for 8 cores thats kind of sad unless the benchmark only uses 4 cores.
Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P//Dell Latitude D620
Phenom II BE 940//Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz
2x2GB OCZ Reaper//1GB PC5400
640GB WD Blue//80gb 7200 rpm hdd
Radeon 4850//Geforce 7300 Go
s7e9h3n: cant Ati 2900 or Nvidia 8800 be modded to fitt in this board?, is one of the cpus coolers to close to the pci-e ? cant the cooler be modded on the cpu? so it can fitt.
So 4k for 8 cores @ 2GHz?
I get 2k with 2 cores @ 2.8GHz. ;_;
If this is correct, even it is server mobo & quite early server CPU, I would say that at least the current K10's are doomed, unless they clock to something like 5-6GHz.
Talking about extreme-end! ;D
Hello old friend,
Nope, the card would make it impossible to install any type of cooler on cpu1. BUT I possibly have a solution to end all questions about the true performance of these cpu's - A WORKING BIOS WHICH SUPPORTS BARCELONA ON THE ASUS L1N64!
Prepare to see some damage done to the ORB![]()
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
My hope is: like good wine, K10 gets better with time![]()
Nice results for a CPU in a , definitively, non-optimised platform.![]()
Is correct to assume that the desktop version of K10 will be much "better" than the server part?
EDIT: s7e9h3n we´re all expecting great things after those words...keep it coming...
Last edited by Blasar; 09-28-2007 at 03:04 AM.
Sorry for my poor english.![]()
For comparison heres what I get if I clock my X2 at 2Gs:
CPU Score 1489 Marks
I hope for AMD's sake that 3DMark doesn't use all 8 cores, because if it does there is a performance gap that cannot be explained away by poor memory bandwith.
Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P//Dell Latitude D620
Phenom II BE 940//Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz
2x2GB OCZ Reaper//1GB PC5400
640GB WD Blue//80gb 7200 rpm hdd
Radeon 4850//Geforce 7300 Go
Originally Posted by Blasar
![]()
I see no reason for performance difference being any other than zero percent (0%.
Just like with K8 server vs. desktop, it's the exact same chip in the end.
You were not supposed to see this.
Very good news s7e9h3n.How soon can you start testing ?
@largon
In case you didn't notice,both s7e9h3n and Dave Graham had various issues with their rigs,memory running in single channel mode and @poor clocks,cas latency is 5 and the memory is regged...Also these are B1s ,not BAs etc.
Last edited by informal; 09-28-2007 at 03:45 AM.
largon, because of memory
Phenom's conventional memory is ddr2 1066; as you know K8 (and obviously K10) performance is extremely depends upon memory speed. You can get 10 per cent or even more performance boost when replacing registered ddr2 667 with low-timing ddr2 1066
we are waiting for a new bios![]()
Bookmarks