Page 31 of 46 FirstFirst ... 212829303132333441 ... LastLast
Results 751 to 775 of 1126

Thread: Here's a little teaser....

  1. #751
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    I think you guys misunderstood me....take a look at my avg. fps. @ 2fps, your opteron beats my octals

  2. #752
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Madison, TN
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n View Post
    I think you guys misunderstood me....take a look at my avg. fps. @ 2fps, your opteron beats my octals
    LOL, I was being kind to my Opty. I think it was actually less then one. You're cpu score is about double the one I had. It's like watching grass grow, reminds me of a few plastic surgery cases I scrubed in on.
    Last edited by PhilDoc; 09-27-2007 at 01:21 PM.

  3. #753
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Rgr that Phil,in dual core rigs,mark06 CPU tests crawl around 0.5-0.8fps ,so Steven's octo rig is mighty fine in around 2fps

  4. #754
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    104
    3800 X2s OC nice.
    http://www.1cup1coffee.com - Play flash games in school

  5. #755
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,321
    nvm, i feel stupid...
    Last edited by cky2k6; 09-27-2007 at 01:30 PM.
    Core i7 920 3849B028 4.2ghz cooled by ek hf | 6gb stt ddr3 2100 | MSI HD6950 cf cooled by ek fc | Evga x58 e760 Classified | 120gb G.Skill Phoenix Pro | Modded Rocketfish case + 1200w toughpower | mcp 655 pump + mcr 320 + black ice pro II

  6. #756
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Madison, TN
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Rgr that Phil,in dual core rigs,mark06 CPU tests crawl around 0.5-0.8fps ,so Steven's octo rig is mighty fine in around 2fps

    Looks pretty tasty to me. I just don't know how much having dual cpus adds to the mix

  7. #757
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    For comparison my X2 5600+ CPU score @3174MHz is 2402.
    CPU1 - Red Valley 0.755 FPS
    CPU2 - Red Valley 1.222 FPS
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  8. #758
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Here's a couple woodcrest numbers if they help comparison for you at all steve

    2x 5120 @ 7x402.5 (2.817ghz)
    4x 1gb FB-DIMM
    X1900GT 648/900

    3d06 cpu score: 4403
    test 1: 1.458fps
    test 2: 2.127fps

    Thats all I can get out of them at the moment.. but there's a bag of dry ice in my freezer

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  9. #759
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,792
    So Penryn on X38 and SkullTrial boards gets:

    3DM 06 (CPU)
    1x QC 3GHz (1333FSB) : 4569 (unreleased part)
    2x QC 3.4GHz (1600FSB) : 6359 (unreleased part)
    1x QC 4.14GHz (1840FSB) : 7000 (Kinc)
    1x QC 5.2GHz (1600FSB) : 8092 (Kinc)

    2x K10 2GHz : 4242

    According to Intel at IDF. Not bad, not bad at all.

    Thanks s7. Must be a good workout
    Last edited by KTE; 09-27-2007 at 09:03 PM.

  10. #760
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    s7e9h3n, gracias

    can you run tests with only one cpu installed? it's not very hard to temporarily remove second cpu from socket (and its memory modules)

    PS see my post http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=743
    Last edited by MAS; 09-27-2007 at 08:12 PM.

  11. #761
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by MAS View Post
    s7e9h3n, gracias

    can you run tests with only one cpu installed? it's not very hard to temporarily remove second cpu from socket (and its memory modules)

    PS see my post http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=743
    tbh, for some reason I'm thinking that 3d06 is calculating the cpu scores using only 4 cores max regardless of platform. also, everyone remember that I'm running the bench @ 200fsb vs. Intel's 333+ speeds...

  12. #762
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n View Post

    *On a side note: I don't know how you guys can stand to watch the CPU tests from 3d06. The bench moves along @ way under 5fps. There were moments when I began wondering if my Etch-A-Sketch could get better frame-rates than this rig
    hahahaha sooo true
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  13. #763
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Blacksburg, VA
    Posts
    329
    The CPU score is pretty good actually, almost doubled up on my X2@2.95Ghz, which is pretty good considering the 950mhz disadvantage, so even assuming that quad cores double performance, thats quite the clock per clock advantage.

    They almost match up with Stevil's dual woodcrests at 2.8 which again suggests a sizeable clock/clock advantage. I would love to see some oced numbers on these chips.
    Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P//Dell Latitude D620
    Phenom II BE 940//Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz
    2x2GB OCZ Reaper//1GB PC5400
    640GB WD Blue//80gb 7200 rpm hdd
    Radeon 4850//Geforce 7300 Go

  14. #764
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by funnyperson1 View Post
    The CPU score is pretty good actually, almost doubled up on my X2@2.95Ghz, which is pretty good considering the 950mhz disadvantage, so even assuming that quad cores double performance, thats quite the clock per clock advantage.

    They almost match up with Stevil's dual woodcrests at 2.8 which again suggests a sizeable clock/clock advantage. I would love to see some oced numbers on these chips.
    Yes, it would be impressive.....if I was running 4 cores. But remember....2xBarcelona = 8 cores

  15. #765
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Blacksburg, VA
    Posts
    329
    Oh wow, I don't know how I missed that, for 8 cores thats kind of sad unless the benchmark only uses 4 cores.
    Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P//Dell Latitude D620
    Phenom II BE 940//Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz
    2x2GB OCZ Reaper//1GB PC5400
    640GB WD Blue//80gb 7200 rpm hdd
    Radeon 4850//Geforce 7300 Go

  16. #766
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,248
    s7e9h3n: cant Ati 2900 or Nvidia 8800 be modded to fitt in this board?, is one of the cpus coolers to close to the pci-e ? cant the cooler be modded on the cpu? so it can fitt.

  17. #767
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    So 4k for 8 cores @ 2GHz?

    I get 2k with 2 cores @ 2.8GHz. ;_;

    If this is correct, even it is server mobo & quite early server CPU, I would say that at least the current K10's are doomed, unless they clock to something like 5-6GHz.

    Talking about extreme-end! ;D

  18. #768
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Lastviking View Post
    s7e9h3n: cant Ati 2900 or Nvidia 8800 be modded to fitt in this board?, is one of the cpus coolers to close to the pci-e ? cant the cooler be modded on the cpu? so it can fitt.
    Hello old friend,
    Nope, the card would make it impossible to install any type of cooler on cpu1. BUT I possibly have a solution to end all questions about the true performance of these cpu's - A WORKING BIOS WHICH SUPPORTS BARCELONA ON THE ASUS L1N64!

    Prepare to see some damage done to the ORB

  19. #769
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n View Post
    Hello old friend,
    Nope, the card would make it impossible to install any type of cooler on cpu1. BUT I possibly have a solution to end all questions about the true performance of these cpu's - A WORKING BIOS WHICH SUPPORTS BARCELONA ON THE ASUS L1N64!

    Prepare to see some damage done to the ORB
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  20. #770
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    117
    My hope is: like good wine, K10 gets better with time

    Nice results for a CPU in a , definitively, non-optimised platform.

    Is correct to assume that the desktop version of K10 will be much "better" than the server part?


    EDIT: s7e9h3n we´re all expecting great things after those words...keep it coming...
    Last edited by Blasar; 09-28-2007 at 03:04 AM.
    Sorry for my poor english.

  21. #771
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Blacksburg, VA
    Posts
    329
    For comparison heres what I get if I clock my X2 at 2Gs:
    CPU Score 1489 Marks

    I hope for AMD's sake that 3DMark doesn't use all 8 cores, because if it does there is a performance gap that cannot be explained away by poor memory bandwith.
    Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P//Dell Latitude D620
    Phenom II BE 940//Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz
    2x2GB OCZ Reaper//1GB PC5400
    640GB WD Blue//80gb 7200 rpm hdd
    Radeon 4850//Geforce 7300 Go

  22. #772
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by Blasar
    Is correct to assume that the desktop version of K10 will be much "better" than the server part?

    I see no reason for performance difference being any other than zero percent (0&#37.
    Just like with K8 server vs. desktop, it's the exact same chip in the end.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  23. #773
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Very good news s7e9h3n .How soon can you start testing ?

    @largon

    In case you didn't notice,both s7e9h3n and Dave Graham had various issues with their rigs,memory running in single channel mode and @poor clocks,cas latency is 5 and the memory is regged...Also these are B1s ,not BAs etc.
    Last edited by informal; 09-28-2007 at 03:45 AM.

  24. #774
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    largon, because of memory

    Phenom's conventional memory is ddr2 1066; as you know K8 (and obviously K10) performance is extremely depends upon memory speed. You can get 10 per cent or even more performance boost when replacing registered ddr2 667 with low-timing ddr2 1066

    we are waiting for a new bios

  25. #775
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,820
    s7e9h3n, how hot are the chips?
    P5E64_Evo/QX9650, 4x X25-E SSD - gimme speed..
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss View Post
    Lately there has been a lot of BS(Dave_Graham where are you?)

Page 31 of 46 FirstFirst ... 212829303132333441 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •