sweetOriginally Posted by SparkyJJO
OK
now make one the other way too. gotta be fair.
sweetOK
lol
Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted
asus L1N64-ws or /b depending on bios chip
4x1gig 8500 gkill bpk
2x opteron 8224 @ 3.8ghz
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=236
vga= 8800gt
winxp pro
custom chiller -31 water
2x dtek fuzions
bix3-with x3panaflo hi output
antec 850 quattro
heat under msimax abitmax and dfimax
*Flicks on a cigarette lighter, raises it above the head and sings (as per Queen: We Will Rock You)*
"We want, we want benchmarks!
We want, we want benchmarks!"Maybe upgrade to Core 2 Quad and make it a fair comparison?
You were not supposed to see this.
LOL excellent!!
The rig
CPUs: E6300 ES B0 @ 3220 MHz w/1.35v orthos stable | E6600 B2 @ 3400 MHz w/1.43v --> Sold | Xeon 3050 L2 @ 3304 MHz w/1.45v orthos stable
MoBo: Asus P5K-E WiFi-AP @ 520 x * orthos stable
Graphics: 256 MB Connect 3D Radeon X1900XT @ 661/828 (core/mem)
RAM: 2 x 1 GB Team Xtreem PC2 5300 @ DDR1010 4-4-4-8 / DDR1100 5-5-5-12 w/2.25v orthos stable
HDDs: 300 GB (16 MB Cache) and 80 GB Maxtor Diamondmax 10 drives
Optical: NEC ND3500AG DVD +/- RW
PSU: Antec True Power 2.0 550W
H2O
Swiftech MCR220-QP | Laing D5 | AquaXtreme MP-05 Pro LE | DangerDen Maze 4 LP | 2 x 120mm NoiseBlocker SX1 fans
Lappy
MSI MS1022 14.1" Widescreen Barebone | Celeron-M 360 1.4 GHz @ 1.86 GHz / Pentium M 715A | GeForce 6200 Go | 80 GB Fujitsu HDD | Sony DVD +/- RW
Waiting for
Nehalem
Thats because Intel uses TDP categories rather than exact TDP. So 67W means lless than or equal to 67W. While say 120W means 67<TDP>=120ok, well thats your theory, and here goes your theory... the E4300 needs 22W under load and has a TDP of 65W... sure, some real avarage power consumption intel gives with its TDP.
Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
GPU:HD5850 1GB
PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty)
i know that.
Still intels TDP is NOT avarage power consumption.
They both do that. And they both use the same measurement.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Please don't say incorrect things, the measurement is not the same
If you are talking about AMD being max TDP and Intel being average TDP then you are quite alot of years late. Because its been the same for quite many years now. And 3.0-3.2Ghz K8s easily reach around their TDP max.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
LOL.....OK
..Do a Side X Side ...... Intel / AMD ....... Winblows / Linux
SuperMicro X8SAX
Xeon 5620
12GB - Crucial ECC DDR3 1333
Intel 520 180GB Cherryville
Areca 1231ML ~ 2~ 250GB Seagate ES.2 ~ Raid 0 ~ 4~ Hitachi 5K3000 2TB ~ Raid 6 ~
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/cont...docs/33954.pdf Page 32, Note 4
Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
GPU:HD5850 1GB
PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty
sweet
Ewww....
wanking he-man rocks.
This is the part when the AMD fanboys start screaming at the intel fanboys:*Flicks on a cigarette lighter, raises it above the head and sings (as per Queen: We Will Rock You)*
"We want, we want benchmarks!
We want, we want benchmarks!" Maybe upgrade to Core 2 Quad and make it a fair comparison?
Buddy you're a boy make a big noise
Playin' in the street gonna be a big man some day
You got mud on yo face
You big disgrace
Kickin' your can all over the place
We will we will rock you
We will we will rock you
Buddy you're a young man hard man
Shoutin' in the street gonna take on the world some day
You got blood on yo face
You big disgrace
Wavin' your banner all over the place
We will we will rock you
We will we will rock you
Buddy you're an old man poor man
Pleadin' with your eyes gonna make you some peace some day
You got mud on your face
You big disgrace
Somebody better put you back in your place
We will we will rock you
We will we will rock you
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
why wouldn't [H] be there when they're a paid marketing wing of AMD LOL!
No matter what's said, I wish AMD Luck.
Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
nice
heh, not that other way
i just want one of each so that who ever comes out on top, i can post the appropriate gif.
"This site doesn't support hotlinking"
I really wanna see that vid
The rig
CPUs: E6300 ES B0 @ 3220 MHz w/1.35v orthos stable | E6600 B2 @ 3400 MHz w/1.43v --> Sold | Xeon 3050 L2 @ 3304 MHz w/1.45v orthos stable
MoBo: Asus P5K-E WiFi-AP @ 520 x * orthos stable
Graphics: 256 MB Connect 3D Radeon X1900XT @ 661/828 (core/mem)
RAM: 2 x 1 GB Team Xtreem PC2 5300 @ DDR1010 4-4-4-8 / DDR1100 5-5-5-12 w/2.25v orthos stable
HDDs: 300 GB (16 MB Cache) and 80 GB Maxtor Diamondmax 10 drives
Optical: NEC ND3500AG DVD +/- RW
PSU: Antec True Power 2.0 550W
H2O
Swiftech MCR220-QP | Laing D5 | AquaXtreme MP-05 Pro LE | DangerDen Maze 4 LP | 2 x 120mm NoiseBlocker SX1 fans
Lappy
MSI MS1022 14.1" Widescreen Barebone | Celeron-M 360 1.4 GHz @ 1.86 GHz / Pentium M 715A | GeForce 6200 Go | 80 GB Fujitsu HDD | Sony DVD +/- RW
Waiting for
Nehalem
Amazing.OK
Good job
No your C2Q will look pretty much the same as the crap2duo when you take on a REAL quad-core cpu"We want, we want benchmarks!
We want, we want benchmarks!" Maybe upgrade to Core 2 Quad and make it a fair comparison?
So what you gonna do then?
1 more day to go......yay
Last edited by SOLDNER-MOFO64; 09-09-2007 at 03:03 AM.
copy & paste"This site doesn't support hotlinking"
I really wanna see that vid
The last architecture INTEL rolled out the door in a rush in order to whoop AMD before AMD could get around to launching BARCELONA, so that INTEL could actually take the performance crown for a little while. They knew BARCELONA was coming and would eclipse everything they've EVER created so threw some PIII's together and came up with crap-2-duo.
They took the same approach with C2Q's......fire a couple of crap-2-duo's together and launch them as a quad-core
"Look everyone.....we've beaten AMD to a pair of DC's on one die....awesome!"
Meanwhile, back in AMD labs.....some of the techs were designing BARCELONA and not skimping on it either.
to AMD PWNAGE
I wish that every new architecture that comes out offering such a performance boost "sucks" as much as C2D.
Intel arent stupid for releasing 2 dual-core dies on 1 chip to get a Quad- 95%+ of people dont give a **** how they get 4 cores onto 1 CPU, as long as they do. From an engineering POV, its a little crude, but in terms of making money and getting something onto the market, its beautiful.
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
isnt money the only thing that counts ? (perfect example would be 3dfx, miles ahead in engineering, but fatal business failures)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks