Page 49 of 79 FirstFirst ... 394647484950515259 ... LastLast
Results 1,201 to 1,225 of 1966

Thread: ASUS P5K Deluxe - Intel P35 Bearlake + E6600 B1 / Q6600 B3

  1. #1201
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    448
    Quote Originally Posted by Supershanks View Post
    something like this is a good idea to try & even out the core temps on wc rgs.. Thermalright LGA775 Bolt-Thru-Kit reduces mobo warping across cpu area so that at least all cores are level & flush with heatsink.
    Have seen many get more even temps by tweaking the tightness of their nuts
    I guess my nuts on my hsf are pretty tight then lol
    Intel Core i7 2600K~stock for now
    ASUS P8Z68 Deluxe
    2x4GB Patriot Viper@DDR3 1600
    MSI Twin Frozr II GTX 570~stock for now
    OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU
    Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
    Logitech G15 & MX518
    Thermaltake Armor Series
    SPDIF out (optical) --> Headroom 2005 DAC --> Little Dot II++ --> Senn HD595s

  2. #1202
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    255
    First, I would like to say thanks to Eva and all the gurus here for this complete thread. It has help me a lot.
    But here is the reason of this post:
    I was testing my beloved L629B when I come to this strange (at least for me) behavior on this motherboard.

    Fsb at 413 x 9 I got 3717
    Fsb at 414 x 9 I got 3312
    Fsb at 415 x 9 I got 3735


    tested twice, fsb set in bios. For some reason at 414, the multi switchs to 8 by itself.
    I need some feedback on this, Is anyone else getting this issue? Is this some kind of strap thing or something related?
    Bios is 311, I have all the options at the cpu menu at disabled, only PECI is enabled.


    I had a similar thing with a P5WDH.. at 414 and 416 it booted ok, but at 415 was a no go.
    Last edited by monza1412; 08-23-2007 at 03:33 PM.

  3. #1203
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hamilton Scotland
    Posts
    819
    it has something to do with the tighness or the thermal grease
    It's nothing to do with the tightness of the thermal grease, more the fact that it ensures that the board isn't warped, so that the whole of the CPU ICH is flush with the cooling block, not just a corner of it.

    A bolt thru kit can have as much impoact as lapping, but fixes different raft of issues.

    `danny
    I guess my nuts on my hsf are pretty tight then
    Very likely
    • i7 920
    • DFI DK X58-T3eH6
    • G.SKILL PI Black DDR3 PC 12800 CL8 6GB kit (F3-12800CL8T-6GBPI-B)
    • Crossfire 2x ATI HD4670 GPU 785 Ram 1060
    • Thermaltake Toughpower 1200w
    • Cooling: Water - EK Supreme
    • Lian Li V2000B+

    24/7 OC 4Ghz 20x200 x8 1600Mhz 8-8-8-21

    Official Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 Info Thread
    DFI DK X58-T3eH6 on Test

  4. #1204
    Registered User chessman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by monza1412 View Post
    First, I would like to say thanks to Eva and all the gurus here for this complete thread. It has help me a lot.
    But here is the reason of this post:
    I was testing my beloved L629B when I come to this strange (at least for me) behavior on this motherboard.
    Fsb at 413 x 9 I got 3717
    Fsb at 414 x 9 I got 3312
    Fsb at 415 x 9 I got 3735
    tested twice, fsb set in bios. For some reason at 414, the multi switchs to 8 by itself.

    I need some feedback on this, Is anyone else getting this issue? Is this some kind of strap thing or something related?
    Bios is 311, I have all the options at the cpu menu at disabled, only PECI is enabled.
    I had a similar thing with a P5WDH.. at 414 and 416 it booted ok, but at 415 was a no go.
    You are right monza1412 !

    The same here :
    Fsb at 413 x 9, I got 3717 with np
    Fsb at 414 x 9, I got 3312 (9 x 368) !!!!
    Fsb at 415 x 9, I got 3735 with np

    Also at (414 x 9) = 3312 (9 x 368) with static read control enabled : not boot !
    These trials with bios 311, later I will try with 501.

    Very strange issue !

    Edit : exactly the same with 501 bios [at 414 x 9, I got 3312 (9 x 368)]
    Last edited by chessman; 08-24-2007 at 01:59 AM.

  5. #1205
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    404
    Is there a way to change the Fsb speed to 1333 on a Asus P5K Deluxe,when using a Q6600??
    Quote Originally Posted by verndewd View Post
    Then we devise an nda breaking method that reroutes the broken nda from china and points to a pig name zhiang in a mud pit in hubei farmlands. The pig would have to have no owner.

    This can be done.
    SPECS:TT Kandalf LCS Case,Asus P5K Deluxe mobo,Intel Q600 CPU,XFX 8800Ultra,Samsung 500Gb HD,Gskill PC6400 ghz memory,Nec DVD-Writer,Creative Xfi Xtreme Music, Corsair HX620Logitech:G15 keyboard,MX518 mouse and Z-5450 Speakers

  6. #1206
    Registered User chessman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by bloodbanger View Post
    Is there a way to change the Fsb speed to 1333 on a Asus P5K Deluxe,when using a Q6600??
    Have a look...

  7. #1207
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    255
    Quote Originally Posted by chessman View Post
    You are right monza1412 !

    The same here :
    Fsb at 413 x 9, I got 3717 with np
    Fsb at 414 x 9, I got 3312 (9 x 368) !!!!
    Fsb at 415 x 9, I got 3735 with np

    Also at (414 x 9) = 3312 (9 x 368) with static read control enabled : not boot !
    These trials with bios 311, later I will try with 501.

    Very strange issue !

    Edit : exactly the same with 501 bios [at 414 x 9, I got 3312 (9 x 368)]




    yes, its a strange issue, maybe someone will come with a logic explanation.
    Anyway, using only 414 of fsb its a shame in this motherboard

  8. #1208
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    41
    What is this enable\disable ME on p5k deluxe board? it is missing the jumper pins. but it can be manipulated with conductive paint i belive. but what is it ?

    it is placed above blue pci-e 16x port and end of DELUXE name.
    Gigabyte X58 UD5@Extreeme bios, I7 920@various ,max 4300 Water cooled, OCZ 6gb 1600LVk,Powercolor 4870x2 with asus top bios,Corsair TX850, 2xwd250ks raid 0.

  9. #1209
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    SP, Brazil
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy L View Post
    What is this enable\disable ME on p5k deluxe board? it is missing the jumper pins. but it can be manipulated with conductive paint i belive. but what is it ?

    it is placed above blue pci-e 16x port and end of DELUXE name.
    I'm curious about that too

    Rbs.
    Sorry for my bad English



    GA-X38-DQ6 Vdroop moded
    Ballistix Tracer PC8500 @ DDR1188 5-5-5-15 2.08v
    Q6600 L737B 475x8 - 3800Mhz @ 1.39v
    8800GTS G92 @ 830/1945/2200 36ºC idle, 39ºC full load (no mods for now..)

    MCR320 | MCR120 | MCP355 + OCLabs XPtop | MCR-RES | FuZion + washer | MCW60


  10. #1210
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Pokerjo View Post
    i have been having a problem with opening control panel in vista when my rig is over clocked

    P5K, e6750@3600

    When i try to open it it just flashes up and then goes in a second, i know others have had this prob but unless i missed somethng no one has found the answer, well if you type (control ncpa.cpl users) into CMD it will open up netwok connections in control panel and you can then select anything in contorl panel you like, not ideal but the best work around i have found.

    hope this help someone as this has been @*#xing me right off
    Actually, it's not stability.... I'm having the same issue as well. Have a look see here though!

    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936686/en-us
    Leaping Ahead....

    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4 Ghz at 1.35 VCore set in BIOS
    HSF: LAPPED Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme + 120mm Yate Loon D12SL
    RAM: 4 x 1GB Crucial Ballistix PC6400 963 Mhz @ 4-4-4-12 2.15V
    Mobo: Asus P5K-Deluxe P35
    HD's: 2 x 74GB Raptors in RAID 0 and 2 x 160GB WD Sata II's in RAID 1
    GPU: EVGA 8800GT 512MB Superclocked 720/1860/1980
    Sound: Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic
    PSU: Corsair HX-620
    Case: CM 690 Loaded with fans but quiet as a mouse.
    Monitor: 22" Samsung 226BW - 2ms of Gaming Joy!

  11. #1211
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    344
    Is raid 0 working properly on this board? Any other issues I should know about before buying one?
    - Intel Xeon W3520 #3848A352 D0 @ 4.4GHz
    - DFI LanParty UT X58-T3eH8 (bios 05/08)
    - 3x2GB Corsair Failinator GT 1866MHz 7-8-7-20 (3x2GB Patriot Viper 1600MHz C8 backup...)
    - Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB @ 872/1000
    - ~5TB assorted WD/Seagate
    - SB X-Fi XtremeMusic & Logitech Z-680 THX
    - Tt Toughpower 1200W Modular
    - CM Stacker T01 Black
    - Eizo FlexScan SX2761W 27" & Samsung 226CW 22"

    CPU Loop: MCP655/D5 - Swiftech Apogee GTZ - Thermochilll PA120.3 - YateLoon SL's - 1/2" MasterKleer
    GPU/Chipset Loop: MCP655/D5 - EK-FC4870 X2 Acetal CF - Swiftech MCW30 - Thermochill PA120.3 - YateLoon SL's - 1/2" MasterKleer

  12. #1212
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    255
    Quote Originally Posted by jagt View Post
    Is raid 0 working properly on this board? Any other issues I should know about before buying one?


    running vista64 in raid 0 (2 Seagate SATA1 drives), no problems so far. But some people had BSOD setting raids with this motherboard, I guess their were defective motherboards.

  13. #1213
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,361
    Those peeps with SATA II, were having probs if I am correct.

    *edit sorry I thought it was pointing the premium, so far I didnt experienced any SATA( raid) probs really on the deluxe
    Last edited by CERO; 08-27-2007 at 02:42 PM.
    DFI Lanparty LT X48-T2R
    Intel Q6600 L737B242 ~ VID 1.2125 ~ 4000mhZ @ 1.48 vcore {lapped}
    eVGA 8800GTS (G92) 512MB {stock}
    Crucial Ballistix PC8500 Tracer ~ 1200mhZ 5-5-5-12 @ 2.05v
    Lian Li PC-V1000 {modded}
    Corsair HX 620W
    Creative X-FI ExtremeMusic
    Western Digital Raptor X 150GB
    Thermalright-Ultra120 Xtreme {lapped} ft. Scythe S-Flex SFF21F S-FDB ~ Push & Pull

  14. #1214
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Guatemala
    Posts
    108
    i have one of this mobo, but i'm using a e6850, overclock nice with stoc vcore, but my temps are too slows, anyone have a problem like this ? :s

  15. #1215
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,361
    Quote Originally Posted by DualCore View Post
    i have one of this mobo, but i'm using a e6850, overclock nice with stoc vcore, but my temps are too slows, anyone have a problem like this ? :s
    what u mean by your temps are too slow?
    DFI Lanparty LT X48-T2R
    Intel Q6600 L737B242 ~ VID 1.2125 ~ 4000mhZ @ 1.48 vcore {lapped}
    eVGA 8800GTS (G92) 512MB {stock}
    Crucial Ballistix PC8500 Tracer ~ 1200mhZ 5-5-5-12 @ 2.05v
    Lian Li PC-V1000 {modded}
    Corsair HX 620W
    Creative X-FI ExtremeMusic
    Western Digital Raptor X 150GB
    Thermalright-Ultra120 Xtreme {lapped} ft. Scythe S-Flex SFF21F S-FDB ~ Push & Pull

  16. #1216
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Guatemala
    Posts
    108
    look this, it's a fresh instalation of vista, i try too in xp 'n have the same temps



    this is on xp @ 3.6


  17. #1217
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta. Canada
    Posts
    252
    Quote Originally Posted by DualCore View Post
    look this, it's a fresh instalation of vista, i try too in xp 'n have the same temps



    this is on xp @ 3.6

    You need to down load the latest core temp Beta 0.95.4 or add 15 deg to your current core temp. See here. Downlaod core temp 0.95.4 Or here I think the link is broken though.
    Last edited by crossg; 08-27-2007 at 03:01 PM.
    Rig 1
    CPU: i7-990X. CASE: Antec Nine Hundred II. CPU Cooling: TR Venomous X RT. MOBO: ASUS Rampage III Formula. RAM: 12GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 CL7. GFX: EVGA GTX 580's x 2. SLI. HDD's: 1.5 TB Seagate, 1TB WD Sata III. Monitor: Samsung 25". PSU: Corsair AX 1200W. Win 7 64 Bit
    Rig 2.
    CPU: i7-2600K. CASE: Antec Nine Hundred II. CPU Cooling: TR Venomous X RT. MOBO: ASUS P8P67 Deluxe. RAM: 4 GB GSkill Ripjaws X DDR3 1600 CL6. GFX: EVGA GTX 580. HDD: 1TB WD Sata III. Monitor: Samsung 23". PSU: Corsair AX 1200W. Win 7 64 Bit.

  18. #1218
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by DualCore View Post
    look this, it's a fresh instalation of vista, i try too in xp 'n have the same temps



    this is on xp @ 3.6

    I had the same problem with E6850. Use AI Siute for temps It seems to be correct.

  19. #1219
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    255
    I was bored today and I did some spi runs just to see the DRAM Static Read Control / Transaction Booster options influence in memset and in the superpi score. All test were done with 5.5.5.15 timings at 1:1 (the others sub-timings at AUTO - Command Rate at 2T - bios 311).


    first run: DRAM Static Read Control DISABLED / Transaction Booster DISABLED (Relax0)





    second run: DRAM Static Read Control DISABLED / Transaction Booster ENABLED (Boost level 1)



    At boost level 0, the performance level went to 11


    third run: DRAM Static Read Control ENABLED / Transaction Booster DISABLED (Relax0)
    * leaving DRAM Static Read Control AUTO / Transaction Booster AUTO gave the same results






    Also changing the relax options shows changes in the performance level in memset, the others subtimings remains the same

    Relax 0 - Performance level 8
    Relax 1 - Performance level 9
    Relax 2 - Performance level 10
    Relax 3 - Performance level 11

    So, as it has been said before, the Dram Static Read Control option has more influence in performance/bandwith gains than the transaction booster option.

  20. #1220
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Guatemala
    Posts
    108
    ok tnks Crossg i try this version, but this link are broke, i try to download later, and tnks Severance i go to install AI Suite now......

  21. #1221
    Registered User chessman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by monza1412 View Post
    I was bored today and I did some spi runs just to see the DRAM Static Read Control / Transaction Booster options influence in memset and in the superpi score. All test were done with 5.5.5.15 timings at 1:1 (the others sub-timings at AUTO - Command Rate at 2T - bios 311).
    Also changing the relax options shows changes in the performance level in memset, the others subtimings remains the same
    Relax 0 - Performance level 8
    Relax 1 - Performance level 9
    Relax 2 - Performance level 10
    Relax 3 - Performance level 11
    So, as it has been said before, the Dram Static Read Control option has more influence in performance/bandwith gains than the transaction booster option.
    I also made this

  22. #1222
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    255
    Quote Originally Posted by chessman View Post
    I also made this


    nice work chessman . I was shocked with the vdrop in this board, from 1.3 in bios to 1.208 load. The voltage damper option should come enabled by default and not at auto that its the same as disabled.
    But I really dont have any serious complain about this mobo, it has all that I didnt find in my P5WDH.

  23. #1223
    Registered User chessman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by monza1412 View Post
    nice work chessman . I was shocked with the vdrop in this board, from 1.3 in bios to 1.208 load. The voltage damper option should come enabled by default and not at auto that its the same as disabled. But I really dont have any serious complain about this mobo, it has all that I didnt find in my P5WDH.
    Thanks ! You are right about the board.
    I 'm wondering about #1208 Tommy's L post...

  24. #1224
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by M Diddy View Post
    Actually, it's not stability.... I'm having the same issue as well. Have a look see here though!

    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936686/en-us
    Thanks M Diddy i didnt think it was a stability issue, i have installed the hotfix and all seems well

    Top man

  25. #1225
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Alcácer do Sal - Portugal
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Pokerjo View Post
    Thanks M Diddy i didnt think it was a stability issue, i have installed the hotfix and all seems well

    Top man
    Where is the hotfix for download??

    Do not I find link.
    Last edited by hornet; 08-29-2007 at 09:55 AM.

Page 49 of 79 FirstFirst ... 394647484950515259 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •