Quote Originally Posted by Ace-a-Rue View Post
sure it can catch up and overtake the DFI board...the DFI could be a sub-par board or a sub-par bios that really did not tweak the chipset to maximize performance (possibly higher latencies to allow higher FSB)...
The IP35pro will never be faster than the DFI 965s clock per clock using the same settings... The 965-s chipset was a lil tweaked to handle high fsb but performance is still very good and its just a tad slower than the Quad GT... This is Quad GT's time again at 3600mhz ( 514fsb * 7 ) 1:1, my DFI was 5 sec slower but the bench below was done by the WR holder for E6600...



Quote Originally Posted by Ace-a-Rue View Post
couldn't do that on the Abit QuadGT board which was a 1066 board too!...no way!

The QuadGT is very capable as you can see ....

I dont know what other test we can do to determine what strap we're running but Im pretty sure my E6600 is running at 1066strap regardless of dividers.....