Results 1 to 25 of 1008

Thread: Official AMD Barcelona Thread

Threaded View

  1. #11
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Epsilon84 View Post
    LOL... that wasn't even the point nn. Not sure why you came up with a random K8 is 3 years old comment. It had nothing to do with what I was posting.

    All along I have been trying to say that AMD is quite 'choosy' in what it compares itself to. Since Turion loses to C2D, it compares itself to CoreDuo instead. Since X2 loses to C2D in CPU performance, it compares platform integrated performance instead, whilst using an outdated platform for C2D as well. Hence my opinion that AMD cherrypicks data, just like any corporation would do. Geddit now?
    QFT!

    They know what you meant and understood it very clearly. That's what stings some of them as cheer for AMD as if they were the Latest Superbowl winners. Barcelona's core improvements should help an already good processor. Just because the old ones got spanked, still didn't mean they sucked.

    Before my next Barkie posts, preface;

    Shadowmage is wrong. Not just a differing opinion, just wrong.

    http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/..._13911,00.html

    AMD + 65bit vs Core1 no 64bits. What if Intel's first Conroe Demo was vs. an FX 55?

    http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/17/a...ight-core-duo/

    Computex 2005 AMD formally launched its Athlon 64 X2 dual-core desktop processor today (May 31, 2005).

    Turion X2 was paper launches a year later May 2006 and actually went on sale AFTER Merom.

    So AMD implies that Turion shipped before Merom, Intel's Notebooks aren't 64bit compat, C2D notebook are newer and rare, and yada yada, all BS. But we should believe what they say about Barcelona, yea, right!

    AMD doesn’t market Turion as a Budget Processor vs. Celeron or C1-Dothan. Unless you guys don’t read AMD’s marketing. No way in hell Intel lies that much. Conroe's debut was a prime example.

    Lastly, we shouldn't accept or make excuses for shi-tte like this from Intel or AMD BTW. That’s not doing ANYONE any kind of favor and just muddies up the info pool. I only hope the problem AMD is having is thermals and not performance bugs. Thermal problems can be fixed, Prescott and the first TBreads pretty much proved that.
    Last edited by Donnie27; 07-13-2007 at 07:21 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •