SInce that K10 thread got closed,I will post my reply to Vapor here :

Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
Because of the scaling of Cinebench, you can't compare 4 core vs. 2core. We'll need an underclocked Quad-FX system and C2Q system to do full comparisons....

EDIT: and everyone, stop attacking/bashing gOJDO....final warning, seen it in way too many threads.
Yes you can compare it per core.Read again what i wrote.
Scaling is 1.85 for dual core K8.
K10,1.6Ghz ,4core - 814.
K10,1.6Ghz,2 core - 440(with scaling of 1.85x from 2 to 4 cores)

K8,1.6Ghz,2 cores(1MB of L2)- 445!!!

So by this we get that K10 is supposedly slower than K8 per core in this test.And test was done on AM2 mobo!
This tells me that that was some early buggy revision with who knows what deactivated trough bios,with sole purpose of demonstrating the performance/watt claims AMD made in the pas(Double the cores ,keep the same total system consumption and double the performance