Official HD 2900 Discussion Thread

[ownage]

maybe with old driver and the test was in VISTA


Test environment : Windows Vista32

http://translate.google.com/translat...&hl=en&ie=UTF8


with 8.374 driver :

X2900XT with a E6400 2Mb cache @ 3000Mhz in windows XP = ~12000 marks (2k6)
X2900XT with E6400 2mb cache @ 3000mhz in Vista = ~11000 makrs ( vista driver suks)

regards

Where did u find this?

[mascaras]

Where did u find this?

what??? 3dmark 2006 scores with E6400 @ 3GHhz?? (my friend have one)



btw:

There is already 8.38 out

8.37


3dmark 2006: 12086
frames 63


8.38


3dmark2006: 12530
frames : 78

http://chiphell.com/viewthread.php?t...&extra=&page=3

E6600 @ 3600mhz ( 400x9) >>> 12530 marks ( 8.38)

Driver packaged version 8.38-070508a-047443E-ATI
ATI Technologies Inc. Vendor ATI Technologies Inc..
2D-driven version 6.14.10.6698
2D-driven program file path System/CurrentControlSet/Control/Video/{8593CF7B-C241-498F-A753-EE FC259F4B6F}/0000
Direct3D version 6.14.10.0503
OpenGL version 6.14.10.6590
Catalyst ® Control Center Version 2007.0508.21 44.36940
Stream (T200) Driver version 6.14.10.1080

[Xion X2]

Mascaras--great feedback, thanks! So your friend scored ~12,500 on 3dM06 with his E6600 at stock speeds? Was the 2900XT overclocked?

Nice to see the 15fps jump in Dark Messiah w/ the new drivers as well! It looks as if they are making progress.

[DeathReborn]

Mascaras--great feedback, thanks! So your friend scored ~12,500 on 3dM06 with his E6600 at stock speeds? Was the 2900XT overclocked?

Nice to see the 15fps jump in Dark Messiah w/ the new drivers as well! It looks as if they are making progress.

Looks like the 8.37 (12k) was stock & the 8.38 (12.5k) was 3.6GHz. 50% CPU OC for 500 point gain. That is unless he got his pics in the wrong order.

[ownage]

Looks like the 8.37 (12k) was stock & the 8.38 (12.5k) was 3.6GHz. 50% CPU OC for 500 point gain. That is unless he got his pics in the wrong order.

http://img292.imageshack.us/my.php?i...b1ed6b7ix5.jpg
no, also 3600mhz, 400fsb, 6x multiplier because of EIST.

Great results!

[Xion X2]

Looks like the 8.37 (12k) was stock & the 8.38 (12.5k) was 3.6GHz. 50% CPU OC for 500 point gain. That is unless he got his pics in the wrong order.

Ah yeah, see it now... still not a bad score. With a single overclocked GTX and my Conroe @ 3.6 I scored 12,200 a few months ago.

[mascaras]

Looks like the 8.37 (12k) has stock & the 8.38 (12.5k) was 3.6GHz. 50% CPU OC for 500 point gain. That is unless he got his pics in the wrong order.

negative , with 8.37 he have EIST enable ( when CPU is Idle run multi x6 and FULL run multi x9 )

look at cpu-z >> FSB = 400 (400x9 = 3600mhz)



He run Both tests :

- E6600 @ 400x9 = 3600mhz >>> 12530marks (3.8)

- E6600 @ 400x9 = 3600mhz >>> 12086marks (3.7)

>>> 78 FPS in Game (3.8)

>>> 63 FPS in Game (3.7)



regards

[mascaras]

Mascaras--great feedback, thanks! So your friend scored ~12,500 on 3dM06 with his E6600 at stock speeds? Was the 2900XT overclocked?

Nice to see the 15fps jump in Dark Messiah w/ the new drivers as well! It looks as if they are making progress.

my friend is testing X2900 with E6400


that 3dmark 2006 scores and Dark Messiah FPS with E6600 its from a guy of other forum , the source is there (in the end of the post)

Source >> http://chiphell.com/viewthread.php?t...&extra=&page=3

http://www.sapphiretech.com/us/media...iew.php?pid=80

Lol,Sapphire could foresee the future,look at the date

link doesnt work


regards