Sooo what, you play games at 640x480x16bit color?Originally Posted by 96redformula7
Maybe this will make for some killer price drops after all. I am all for killer price drops despite whoever has the crown.
On a Side note: I HATE BENCHMARK GRAPHS THAT DO NOT START AT 0 !!
Edited note: Those last graphs are for special circumstances only ! Notice they are with HDR and the second one is for stencil shadow, whatever that may be.
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
I don't understand you.......Sooo what, you play games at 640x480x16bit color?
Inside joke or something about what I said? I meant how they started the graph with 80% making it seems further stretched out of a difference and also how it is using % and not actual FPS.
My 8800GTS maxes out my westinghouse 27" actually at 1365x768 in all games so far.
Last edited by 96redformula; 04-29-2007 at 04:04 PM.
HTPC - AMD Phenom II 555 Unlocked(4cores) - 4GB Gskill - AMD HD 5850 - Avermedia Duet - Harman Kardon avr247 - Surround Sound (Infinity Beta 50's, 10's, 360, and ed a2-300) - Samsung 46"
Desktop Powerhouse PC - Gathering dust due to high usage of HTPC as general pc now
my point is that Those last graphs are not for special circumstances only, simply because HDR and high detail resolution is going to become massively more popular
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
Is that the lowest res? I think I play my games at a res lower than that.Sooo what, you play games at 640x480x16bit color?
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks