i agree completely! the point is to keep some sort of safety margin to the throttling point. as i said already, this point is different from cpu to cpu AND can't be read by software. so software like coretemp is using either 85c or 100c as throttling point, which might be correct on some cpu's but is definitely wrong on others.Originally Posted by Millyons
don't get me wrong, im not blaming the writer of coretemp! this is completely intels fault for not providing documentation of this features to the public. i'm still a great supporter of coretemp!
would be a nice feature if coretemp would also display the dts reading directly just showing the room left to the throttling point. i already requested this at the coretemp forum. lets see if "The Coolest" will implement this in a future release.
this is a good example. i'm pretty sure, coretemp is using the wrong throttling temp on your specific cpu and therefore fails calculating the absolute temperature correctly.Originally Posted by cadaveca
Yes, i too think it's the best ATM, as long as you are using it on a cpu where coretemp gets the throttling point correctly!



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks