Results 1 to 25 of 77

Thread: Intel Thermal Analysis Tool

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    570
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewZorn
    no wonder AMD fans think even the 65nm conroe runs hotter than an AX2 (not that it DOESNT, im not sure, but it doesnt run as hot as they think)
    AMD fans think Conroe runs hot because they have no clue how hot their 100W+ Athlons really run. It doesn't help that so many Conroe users mistakenly think that TAT and Core Temp readings are somehow comparable to other cpu temps, because they aren't.
    Gigabyte GA965P-DS3
    E6400 @390FSB/3120MHz (1.40V)
    Scythe Ninja Plus 1500rpm fan
    2x1GB OCZ EL Platinum XTC Rev. 1 @DDR780/4-4-4-12/2.1V
    EVGA 7800GT-CO @500/1150
    Seagate 7200.10 320GB/16MB SATAII
    Etc.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,821
    Quote Originally Posted by Fred_Pohl
    AMD fans think Conroe runs hot because they have no clue how hot their 100W+ Athlons really run. It doesn't help that so many Conroe users mistakenly think that TAT and Core Temp readings are somehow comparable to other cpu temps, because they aren't.
    thats very true. my Scythe Mine's heatpipes do not even get warm under full load with my 6300@2.8GHZ@1.32 volts(bios) I think this is reading at the very heart of the core thus giving very accurate temps at that spot. Its cooler running than my old Opteron 165@2.7GHZ as I can feel the back dumping off much less heat.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    570
    Quote Originally Posted by vengance_01
    thats very true. my Scythe Mine's heatpipes do not even get warm under full load with my 6300@2.8GHZ@1.32 volts(bios) I think this is reading at the very heart of the core thus giving very accurate temps at that spot. Its cooler running than my old Opteron 165@2.7GHZ as I can feel the back dumping off much less heat.
    Finally! Thank you. I'm so tired of reading opinions about how the bios, speedfan, easytune, etc. are reading some nonexistent mobo socket thermistor and that Core Temp, iTAT and Everest are reporting "true" on-die temps. While the second part may be true, it's important to understand that Core Temp, etc. are reading sensors that don't exist on any other cpu and are therefore not comparable. As for the socket thermistor theory, that's just plain BS. Every Intel CPU since the P2 has had an on-die thermal diode which has been read by the mobo to get the cpu temp.

    Nice to meet someone else who "gets it".
    Gigabyte GA965P-DS3
    E6400 @390FSB/3120MHz (1.40V)
    Scythe Ninja Plus 1500rpm fan
    2x1GB OCZ EL Platinum XTC Rev. 1 @DDR780/4-4-4-12/2.1V
    EVGA 7800GT-CO @500/1150
    Seagate 7200.10 320GB/16MB SATAII
    Etc.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    190
    mine worked just fine....does this crash computer.....dont want to crash computer....holy
    this things says my temp is 35-37...my bios and LAvalys say its like 42-45....









    -Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3Ghz
    -Asus P5B Deluxe
    -Leadtek 7900GTX @ 680/1750
    -2-Gb Corsair DDR2 XMS2 800
    -Aspire X-Navigator case
    -RaidMax 630Watt Volcano
    -Tuniq Tower 120 Lapped
    (31 idle, 45 load)
    -Stock used to be
    (43 idle, 56 load)
    what a drop

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    IoM
    Posts
    196
    My temps are a few degrees higher with this than Core Temp. Think I'll leave Prime95 running over night and see what the temps are like in the morning, reached 67c after a couple of minutes 100% load that's with 1.48vcore.

    EDIT: It seems this program stresses the processor more than Prime95 because with two instances of Prime running the max temp was 62c on core 1 and 60c on core 2, that was with Prime running for two hours.
    Last edited by Jimi...; 09-20-2006 at 06:55 PM.
    Asus P5W DH | Intel C2D E6600 | 2GB G.Skill HZ PC2 6400 | X1900XT


  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    West Covina. CA
    Posts
    1,301
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimi...
    My temps are a few degrees higher with this than Core Temp. Think I'll leave Prime95 running over night and see what the temps are like in the morning, reached 67c after a couple of minutes 100% load that's with 1.48vcore.

    EDIT: It seems this program stresses the processor more than Prime95 because with two instances of Prime running the max temp was 62c on core 1 and 60c on core 2, that was with Prime running for two hours.
    Of course. TAT stresses the CPU as much as BurnBX (BurnP6.exe) did. And that was the most stressful program out there.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •