Coolaler 7900GTX 3dmark scores

**zakelwe** · 03-08-2006, 03:24 AM

Looks to be standard cooling more or less.

http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread...1&page=6&pp=10

Seems that on stock hsf about 700 is the average according to reports

Regards

Andy

**zakelwe** · 03-08-2006, 03:31 AM

Originally Posted by Willis

link does not work..

What you talking about Willis ?

heh heh ..

Fixed now...thanks

Regards

Andy

**Micutzu** · 03-08-2006, 03:31 AM

I think he's talking about this : http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread...1&page=1&pp=10

**zakelwe** · 03-08-2006, 03:39 AM

Scores look in line with simple speed bump over 7800GTX 512, ie compare to

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4479285

for 03.

It maybe possible for top overclockers to get these cards to 1GHz ( maybe ).

Regards

Andy

**Gnome** · 03-08-2006, 03:52 AM

looks like it was just a die shrink w/ minor optimisations...

**perkam** · 03-08-2006, 04:04 AM

That seems a tad low for 710/1860

Perkam

**Daveb2012** · 03-08-2006, 04:13 AM

Im sure they have more potential then this. It wouldn't make sence that Nvidia would release a slower card then ATI, after ATI. Especially months after and then try to sell it for more money. I hope this is not why they are introducing quad SLI at the time of launch.

**~~GoThr3k~~** · 03-08-2006, 04:37 AM

thats why are selling it for less money

**Dynasty** · 03-08-2006, 05:34 AM

7800 GTX-81.98 @ 714/2095 (1024 ram)
12,463

7900 GTX @ 710/1860 (2048 ram)

12,287

Hope 825 core clks is easy for the 7900gtx under air/water cooled.

**Marioace** · 03-08-2006, 07:41 AM

but the card Box shows Albatron 7900GT 256MB

and is a 7900GTX
24PipeLines
CineFx 4.0 HDTV

WTH?

**mascaras** · 03-08-2006, 07:46 AM

3DMark06 @ Default:

3DMark05 @ Default

3DMark03 @ Default

3DMark01 @ Default

:
84.17 used alone 20~30% growth (fear)

**perkam** · 03-08-2006, 07:53 AM

That's impressive

But showing us an 01 score with a 3ghz FX-60 tells us zip about the card

Let's see some FX-60 @ stock numbers if you want to compare 01 scores

Perkam

**Daveb2012** · 03-08-2006, 08:10 AM

thats a pretty good stock 3d05 run, better then an xtx I think, better then mine atleast.

**mascaras** · 03-08-2006, 08:14 AM

i think the score its almost the same as X1900XTX , dont forget this 7900GTX 3dmark 2005 score its in a FX-60 runing at 3Ghz

**Starscream** · 03-08-2006, 08:34 AM

chance that the 3Ghz FX60 is holding the 7900GTX back?

**_JP_** · 03-08-2006, 08:43 AM

Maybe...

**ahmad** · 03-08-2006, 08:52 AM

Originally Posted by Daveb2012

thats a pretty good stock 3d05 run, better then an xtx I think, better then mine atleast.

You don't have an FX-60 at 3GHz now do you.

Thats very... unimpressive. I guess thats why these cards are going for so cheap. Hardly worth even considering

See this score below? Thats with a stock x1900XTX, no OS tweaks, and no driver tweaks. Drivers all default. On top of that, the opteron 170 is running at less than 2.7GHz. Imagine what I could do with a 3GHz FX

Also, note the 12+ additional processes running in the background. Hardly what I would call tweaked.

**Dynasty** · 03-08-2006, 08:55 AM

FX60 @ 3ghz with an stock XTX would hit over 12K easy with 6.2 drivers in 05

I do this at stock core clks and 783 on ram,
with an slower single core & used 6.1 CCC's with only 512mb of ram.

**nachthymnen** · 03-08-2006, 09:03 AM

For now I'm not very impressed...
For sure this new 7900 can be a good clocker but I think to hold my 7800GTX512 for now.

**Starscream** · 03-08-2006, 09:04 AM

Originally Posted by ahmad

You don't have an FX-60 at 3GHz now do you.

Thats very... unimpressive. I guess thats why these cards are going for so cheap. Hardly worth even considering

maybe not for you but its the minority spending big bucks on graphics cards.
wich stil is nice money for ATi and Nvidia but it aint the 400+ cards that ATI and Nvidia make the big cash with.

thats the reason why alot of people are guesing that the 7900GT could b a really good card.

ATI and Nvidia both want to have the fastest card out but if at the end of the month you wanna make money you have to have the best card price performence wise.

**Blacklash** · 03-08-2006, 09:06 AM

I can do just over 12k in 05 with my XTX at stock speed and the with 6.2 driver. It's 12,050 to be exact.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1792312

So I'd image a 3GHz speed chip with my same card and driver would stomp me.

**perkam** · 03-08-2006, 09:14 AM

Originally Posted by nachthymnen

For now I'm not very impressed...
For sure this new 7900 can be a good clocker but I think to hold my 7800GTX512 for now.

Plus some 7900GTXs have 1.2ns ram

So 7800GTX512 users will have to forego the 2ghz mem clocks

perakm

**metro.cl** · 03-08-2006, 09:26 AM

you have to wait for the real overclocked cards i think we can get lots of WR, how high a 7800gtx 512 could go on air (with stock cooler)??

p.d. also as marioace points the box doesnt match the card he is testing

**nachthymnen** · 03-08-2006, 09:35 AM

Originally Posted by perkam

Plus some 7900GTXs have 1.2ns ram

So 7800GTX512 users will have to forego the 2ghz mem clocks

perakm

Yes...This is an great card,nothing to say,but the 1900 impress me mouch than this new 7900...
I prefere to wait the next model...
The v-moded memory of my 7800 can take easy the 2106mhz benchable and the core around 725 under liquid...
I will hold my money for the next models

**_JP_** · 03-08-2006, 09:37 AM

Originally Posted by perkam

Plus some 7900GTXs have 1.2ns ram

So 7800GTX512 users will have to forego the 2ghz mem clocks

perakm

Not True...Have 1.1ns GDDR3.

Thread: Coolaler 7900GTX 3dmark scores

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Coolaler 7900GTX 3dmark scores

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions