Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
You have seen "it". The vrzone and now coolaler posted same results. "This" means slower than Thuban or barely matching Thuban. And I use 8150 for comparison,not 8120. Granted there are some cases where 8150 with this level of performance will still probably spank 1100T,but nothing like the projections from December last year showed. Where is the double-sized SMT capable FlexFP performance? Where is the HPC improvement that is quoted for server parts gone? Remember we are left to think that even in legacy code server parts will be ~50% faster with same clocks as previous MC cores. This equates to around 10% better per core performance in SIMD workloads. All Zambezi leaks thus far show no such thing . On the contrary they show very poor performance of this "powerful double-sized FPU".
I don't understand why you're still trying to draw a rational conclusion from yet again "just another leaked benchmark." The results are all over the place in terms of performance within the last 6 months. I thought we had decided that it makes the most sense to take these things with a giant bowl of salt until we have official results once the NDA is lifted?