Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 34 of 34

Thread: Crucial C400 SSD listed for sale w/ pricing

  1. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by Anvil View Post
    Yeah, thats the same document.

    The reduced random performance might be due to the 8KB pagesize.
    The AS-SSD QD=1 4KB random read is 20 MB/s for the C400, as compared to about 30MB/s for the C300. So I guess you may be right that the 8KB page size of the 25nm flash is slowing the C400 down there.

    For the small number of users who reach high QD, the 4K-64 performance of the C400 is much better than the Intel 510 or the Corsair P3, which I guess shows what Micron's firmware programmers can accomplish with the Marvell controller. But the C400 loses out on sequential speed to the others, which is probably relevant to more users than 4K-64 performance.
    Last edited by johnw; 03-21-2011 at 11:45 PM.

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    972
    Not that bad compared to the OCZ & Intel drives vs price..

    OCZ Vertex 3 240G at $539.99 ETA 04-01-11

    C400/M4 256GB $455.00 now

    Intel 510 250GB $615.00 now
    CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K 4.8GHz
    MOBO: GIGABYTE GA-G1.Sniper M5 MATX 1150
    MEMORY: G.SKILL Trident X 8GB 2400MHz 9-11-11-31 1T
    GPU: 2 x eVGA GTX 780 SC
    SOUND KRK Rokit 5 Limited Edition White Studio Monitors
    SSD: 4 x Samsung 128GB Pro's Raid 0
    PSU: SeaSonic Platinum 1000W
    COOLING: 2 x Alphacool NexXxoS UT60 Full Copper 420mm 6 x Swiftech Helix 140mm Fans
    CASE: Lian Li PC-C32B TECH STATION MOD build log coming soon
    MONITOR: ASUS VG278HE Black 27" 149Hz
    O.S: Windows 7 Pro x64

  3. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    936
    I'd compare to iastor driver benchmarks for the Intel 510 and the Vertex 3, to be more consistent. It is interesting how many of the new SSDs are coming in at 20 MB/s for AS-SSD QD=1 4KB random read.

    http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1552/6/


    http://www.micronblogs.com/2011/03/c...2%80%99s-fast/


    http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1563/6/


    The Sandforce 2XXX controller is looking really impressive. It loses only in sequential write (to the Intel 510), and wins or ties in everything else. Assuming the pre-release Vertex 3 was not specially tuned in any way, it should be interesting to see how the Sandforce 2XXX SSDs from the other manufacturers (G.Skill, Corsair, Patriot) compare on price to the Intel 510 and the C400. I'd not buy an OCZ drive, but the Sandforce 2XXX controller looks like it is the one to beat.
    Last edited by johnw; 03-21-2011 at 08:33 PM.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    yea 20mb/s @4k1 can be a bit misleading though. many storage companies/testers consider 8K to be the typical OS usage pattern. so it would be very interesting to see some 8K numbers off these drives.
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  5. #30
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Quote Originally Posted by johnw View Post
    ....
    It is interesting how many of the new SSDs are coming in at 20 MB/s for AS-SSD QD=1 4KB random read.
    ...
    Indeed it is...

    I'd like to see some benchmarks on other chipsets/controllers. e.g. SB850 and the 9211 HBA.

    edit:

    @CT
    I was thinking the same thing, we might need more of the 8KB tests to differantiate the new SSDs.
    From some of the tests I've seen on the new Marvell controller it does look great at some of the 8KB benchmarks, like e.g. iometer database.
    Last edited by Anvil; 03-22-2011 at 01:19 AM.
    -
    Hardware:

  6. #31
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    LSI suggest doing 8K read/write of 30%write, and 70% read as a conventional OS test pattern. for drives that are 'optimized' for 8k with 8k pages, you might yield some really good real world results with them. ya know, that 'snappiness' factor that has always been hard to quantify with benchmarks....cant wait to get ahold of a few of them and play...gonna see how long i can beat on these old vertex though...they are just so damn good
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  7. #32
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    The SSD Review has posted a shot of CDM for the 256 GB M4.

    http://thessdreview.com/Forums/crucial/512-2.htm



    The guy is posting a full review tomorrow, supposedly. 98MB/s 4K random write is damn impressive.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  8. #33
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Computurd View Post
    LSI suggest doing 8K read/write of 30%write, and 70% read as a conventional OS test pattern. for drives that are 'optimized' for 8k with 8k pages, you might yield some really good real world results with them. ya know, that 'snappiness' factor that has always been hard to quantify with benchmarks....cant wait to get ahold of a few of them and play...gonna see how long i can beat on these old vertex though...they are just so damn good
    iometer standard tests

    Database : 8KB 67%/33% read/write, 100% random.
    Workstation : 8KB 80%/20% read/write, 80% random.

    Database pattern is almost the perfect match.

    Just waiting for some drives...
    Looks like the Vertex 3's are going to take quite some time to surface?
    (dates are slipping, new eta mid April)
    -
    Hardware:

  9. #34
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    149
    I just finished my system (water cooled I7 950 w/12 gigs of memory) and looking to run a pair of these is a RAID 0 config. I want to get a pair of 256 gig drives but that's a pretty big nut but man will that spool data. The worse thing is by this time next year those drives will cost 1/2 of what they are today. This is for a high-end CAD workstation. Overkill? definitely. Just waiting for them to become available. The Superbizz site lists them as available. Is that real?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •