Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Locating nVidia reference board numbers

  1. #1
    Mr Swiftech
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    1,561

    Locating nVidia reference board numbers

    After scratching my head for days to try to ease consumer confusion with all the different revisions available for reference VGA boards, I inspected a board and found the revision number printed just below the nVidia logo. Once the board revisions numbers (P891, P892, etc..) are made public, it then becomes relatively easy (need magnifying glasses depending on your age) to identify the boards by simply looking this up:



    I hope this helps. Now all is left is for all OEM vendors to identify which reference board their solutions are compatible with. Swiftech is.
    Last edited by gabe; 05-27-2009 at 07:03 PM.
    CEO Swiftech

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1,491
    Good luck seeing that when you're ordering online

    The question becomes, how in the heck does one cool these cards? Will they still be compatible with the core blocks? Is it just a layout change or did the hole pattern around the core change a bit?
    RIG 1 (in progress):
    Core i7 920 @ 3GHz 1.17v (WIP) / EVGA X58 Classified 3X SLI / Crucial D9JNL 3x2GB @ 1430 7-7-7-20 1T 1.65v
    Corsair HX1000 / EVGA GTX 295 SLI / X-FI Titanium FATAL1TY Pro / Samsung SyncMaster 245b 24" / MM H2GO
    2x X25-M 80GB (RAID0) + Caviar 500 GB / Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RC1 Build 7100

    RIG 2:
    E4500 @ 3.0 / Asus P5Q / 4x1 GB DDR2-667
    CoolerMaster Extreme Power / BFG 9800 GT OC / LG 22"
    Antec Ninehundred / Onboard Sound / TRUE / Vista 32

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    Yes all fine with core only blocks

  4. #4
    Mr Swiftech
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    1,561
    Quote Originally Posted by zlojack View Post
    Good luck seeing that when you're ordering online

    The question becomes, how in the heck does one cool these cards? Will they still be compatible with the core blocks? Is it just a layout change or did the hole pattern around the core change a bit?
    Well at least now we can clearly identify board revisions.
    CEO Swiftech

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Perth, Aus
    Posts
    179
    Step 1. Order Card
    Step 2. Read card for code
    Step 3. Order block

    I'm sure the watercooling companies (e.g. leaders like Swiftech) will be more diligent about publicising this information!

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    278
    Koolance dean you got any plans to help out the effected customers?

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by MomijiTMO View Post
    Yes all fine with core only blocks
    It would make the Swiftech 285 unisink useless though. Here's the thread and a pic of mine if you haven't seem it before:

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=223012


    Gabe, will there be a new rev of the unisink?

  8. #8
    Mr Swiftech
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    1,561
    Quote Originally Posted by Volkum View Post
    It would make the Swiftech 285 unisink useless though. Here's the thread and a pic of mine if you haven't seem it before:

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=223012


    Gabe, will there be a new rev of the unisink?
    Yes..
    CEO Swiftech

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Seattle, Wa
    Posts
    237
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad8988 View Post
    Koolance dean you got any plans to help out the effected customers?
    We're working on a fix

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by gabe View Post
    Yes..
    Any idea when we can expect the revised version?

    Fortunately I found this thread absent mindly surfing around just hours after I placed the order for my Unisink. Luckily Alex at petras was on the ball and was able to modify my order before it went out.

    So I'm stuck aircooling in the meantime until the revised version hits shelves. as quality as the EK blocks are I really want to save some $$ and keep using my MCW60..

    Maybe I can hack up my GTX260 65nm unisink for an "in the mean time" solution.... (or not )

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    278
    Theres a pic of the diff PCB's bare but you can tell if you look in the end of the cooler as the little silver capacitors are in a totally different place from the old to the new PCB's.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by Brad8988 View Post
    Theres a pic of the diff PCB's bare but you can tell if you look in the end of the cooler as the little silver capacitors are in a totally different place from the old to the new PCB's.
    Well color me really disappointed.

    I see gabe mentioned new unisinks are in the works above. I hope they come soon. I really wanted to get my card into my loop as soon as I got it.

    Guess I'll be running aircooled until they get something out. I'm considering just buying the EK block so I can just be done with it already.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    278
    Lol im in the same boat dude and i even went as far as getting the block before the card so have to now try send it back and get a new one.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    126
    Well my 285 came in and of course it's an old model just as I expected.

    I just swapped the new card in and now it's the loudest thing in my office and I'm just surfing XS

    We need a Unisink for these new PCBs stat! My ears beg of you!

  15. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Back and forth between Florida and Maine
    Posts
    4,097
    Good info. I'm also interested in the potential availability of blocks for the new ATI 4890 non-reference designs (e.g. Sapphire 4890 Toxic and Vapor-X versions) - which I just realized does not fall into the nVidia subject of this post - oops.

    It's gotta be crazy for the manufacturers to keep up with all these changing versions.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •