Thank you cstkl1 and cheapseats for this thing with strap 200.

I did some tests with 400x10 1600 and I can confirm that with 1600 CAS7 tRD 5 give the same performance as 1600 CAS6 tRD6 but with lower DIMMv and NBv , quite awesome I think.

1600 777 21 tRD5 Strong Strap 200 DIMMv ~1,80 NBv ~1,33


1600 666 18 tRD6 Strong Strap 333 DIMMv ~2,00 NBv ~1,51


Lower the timing, 1600 666 18 tRD5 Strong Strap 200 DIMMv ~2,00 NBv ~1,35


Not much of a different, conclusion, using strap 200 at 1600 777 21 make it possible to use tRD5 with low DIMMv and NBv.


Lower the tRD, 1600 666 18 tRD4 Strong Strap 200 DIMMv ~2,00 NBv ~1,70


Back to Strap 333, 1600 666 tRD5 Strong Strap 333 DIMMv ~2,00 NBv ~1,70


Not much of a different in bandwidth but in latency and with much higher DIMMv and NBv.


And once again, using strap 200 at 1600 777 21 make it possible to use tRD5 with low DIMMv and NBv and it gives a pretty good performance, quite awesome in my opinion.

Credit to cstkl1 and cheapseats for this.