MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 68

Thread: My WB Testing Results, Excel file inside.

Hybrid View

  1. 07-17-2007, 01:57 PM #1
    nikhsub1
    nikhsub1 is offline
    Unoriginal Macho Energy
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    3,158
    Send a message via AIM to nikhsub1
    Quote Originally Posted by Petra View Post
    Is this what you were thinking of, Scott? (rounded mean average of your test runs)

    Couple oddities... averaged, the FuZion 6.5mm nozzle data seems odd (borked mounts, perhaps?), wtf is the 'Apogee GT Hybrid', and I'm assuming that the 4.5mm nozzle tests were non-bowed (and that the bowed FuZion tests were with no add-in nozzle), yes?
    I was hoping to have each mount in a graph, but that may be too busy? ROFL.

    Actually, the 6.5 nozzle data should really be discarded... the nozzle was not inserted properly, made that mistake on the 4.5mm at first too. To clarify, the 6.5 nozzle is just the nozzle, the 4.5mm nozzle testing is with a PROPERLY inserted nozzle and the ek barb o-ring between top and mid plate - so this is nozzle + bow if you will. The 'bowed' fuzion is with no nozzle and just the oring. Now, the GT hybrid was something I had to try... I wanted to be certain that the better performance of the GTX was due to the deck height of the top and the diagonal flow arrangement and NOT due to the more square mount. I guess a picture is worth...

    Oh and Alex, your Apogee GT Flat? in the graph is actually the GT bowed but mounted VERTICALLY and not horizontally... bout 1-1.5C better as you can see. Gabe mentioned that on the GT with a DUAL CORE (single die) it matters which way the water flows.

    Last edited by nikhsub1; 07-17-2007 at 02:01 PM.

    *:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
    GTZ --> MCW-NBMAX --> EK FC --> PA 120.3 --> PA 160.1 --> 2x DDC Ultras in Series --> Custom Clear Res
    "Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."
    *:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
    Quote Originally Posted by ranker View Post
    Did you just get hit in the head with a heavy object? Because obviously you're failing at reading comprehension.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 07-17-2007, 02:08 PM #2
    rdmty
    rdmty is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by nikhsub1 View Post
    Gabe mentioned that on the GT with a DUAL CORE (single die) it matters which way the water flows.
    what about quad core?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 07-17-2007, 02:27 PM #3
    Petra
    Petra is offline
    I am Xtreme-ly Unemployed
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Palmdale, CA USA
    Posts
    1,932
    Send a message via AIM to Petra
    Quote Originally Posted by nikhsub1 View Post
    I was hoping to have each mount in a graph, but that may be too busy? ROFL.
    Well, if you did a separate graph for each set of results, then it wouldn't be too bad... you'd just have a lot of graphs.

    Actually, the 6.5 nozzle data should really be discarded... the nozzle was not inserted properly, made that mistake on the 4.5mm at first too. To clarify, the 6.5 nozzle is just the nozzle, the 4.5mm nozzle testing is with a PROPERLY inserted nozzle and the ek barb o-ring between top and mid plate - so this is nozzle + bow if you will. The 'bowed' fuzion is with no nozzle and just the oring. Now, the GT hybrid was something I had to try... I wanted to be certain that the better performance of the GTX was due to the deck height of the top and the diagonal flow arrangement and NOT due to the more square mount.
    Chart updated accordingly....

    Oh and Alex, your Apogee GT Flat? in the graph is actually the GT bowed but mounted VERTICALLY and not horizontally...
    The Apogee GT (bowed, vertical) is/was already on the chart... You have a set of tests that are labeled "Apogee GTX" (between the bowed FuZion test and the last 4.5mm nozzle test) that I'm assuming are of a stock/flat GTX, no?
    I'm doing science and I'm still alive...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 07-17-2007, 02:50 PM #4
    nikhsub1
    nikhsub1 is offline
    Unoriginal Macho Energy
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    3,158
    Send a message via AIM to nikhsub1
    Quote Originally Posted by Petra View Post
    The Apogee GT (bowed, vertical) is/was already on the chart... You have a set of tests that are labeled "Apogee GTX" (between the bowed FuZion test and the last 4.5mm nozzle test) that I'm assuming are of a stock/flat GTX, no?
    Yes sorry you are correct... 2 mounts of the 'flat' GTX. As you can see, the performance is well... so that is why I didn't bother to continue...

    @ rdmty - I don't have a quad core and I have no interest in rerunning these tests for quad ATM.

    *:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
    GTZ --> MCW-NBMAX --> EK FC --> PA 120.3 --> PA 160.1 --> 2x DDC Ultras in Series --> Custom Clear Res
    "Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."
    *:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
    Quote Originally Posted by ranker View Post
    Did you just get hit in the head with a heavy object? Because obviously you're failing at reading comprehension.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 07-17-2007, 04:50 PM #5
    rdmty
    rdmty is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by nikhsub1 View Post
    @ rdmty - I don't have a quad core and I have no interest in rerunning these tests for quad ATM.
    Oops was just wondering if Gabe said anything about the mounting direction for quad cores.


    When you say mounting the GT vertically as opposed to horizontally, do you mean the in/outlets should be on top of each other rather than to the left/right of each other?


    Thanks for the results btw! (makes me want a fuzion now)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 07-17-2007, 05:30 PM #6
    SiGfever
    SiGfever is offline
    Hamster Powered
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA [Krunching since 2001]
    Posts
    7,623
    This is excellent work nik as usual. It had to be very tedious with that many blocks x mounts and test data.

    The test done with a DDC and a D5 would be very interesting to compare blocks performance.
    XSWCG Disclaimer:
    We are not responsible for the large sums of money that you WILL want to spend to upgrade and add additional equipment. This is an addiction and the forum takes no responsibility morally or financially for the equipment and therapy cost. Thank you and have a great day.

    Sigmund Freud said... "Failure to CRUNCH is a sign of Sexual Inadequacies".
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 07-17-2007, 05:43 PM #7
    Bun-Bun
    Bun-Bun is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Saskatoon (Canada)
    Posts
    1,568
    I wonder if these nozzles would give the same performance gain with a Quad Core?

    Yin|Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD5-B3|Swiftech XT -> GTX240 -> DDC+ w/ Petra's|2600K @ 5.0GHz @1.368V |4 x 4 GB G.Skill Eco DDR3-1600-8-8-8-24|Asus DirectCUII GTX670|120 GB Crucial M4|2 x 2 TB Seagate LP(Raid-0)|Plextor 755-SA|Auzentech Prelude 7.1|Seasonic M12-700|Lian-Li PC-6077B (Heavily Modded)

    Squire|Shuttle SD36G5M| R.I.P.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 07-17-2007, 06:13 PM #8
    Martinm210
    Martinm210 is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    5,693
    Wow, that's how testing should be done. Kudos to all your hard work, it is very much appreciated!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 07-18-2007, 01:56 PM #9
    Cathar
    Cathar is offline
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,026
    Went to machinists yesterday, and asked to get a new top made up for the incomplete G7. They had apparently backed up all my block data onto a CD, but something had gone wrong, and the CD didn't have my data on it, and all the original mastercam plans were gone.

    i.e. the machinists have lost all the Mastercam work for all of my blocks and we're back to the paper plans again.

    Oh well, what they lost wasn't like to get made again anyway, but it'll take a couple of extra weeks to get the G7 top made up.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 07-18-2007, 02:04 PM #10
    Bun-Bun
    Bun-Bun is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Saskatoon (Canada)
    Posts
    1,568
    Quote Originally Posted by Cathar View Post
    Went to machinists yesterday, and asked to get a new top made up for the incomplete G7. They had apparently backed up all my block data onto a CD, but something had gone wrong, and the CD didn't have my data on it, and all the original mastercam plans were gone.

    i.e. the machinists have lost all the Mastercam work for all of my blocks and we're back to the paper plans again.

    Oh well, what they lost wasn't like to get made again anyway, but it'll take a couple of extra weeks to get the G7 top made up.
    poop... a lot of work that mastercam is... well... coudl be a LOT worse... lol

    Yin|Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD5-B3|Swiftech XT -> GTX240 -> DDC+ w/ Petra's|2600K @ 5.0GHz @1.368V |4 x 4 GB G.Skill Eco DDR3-1600-8-8-8-24|Asus DirectCUII GTX670|120 GB Crucial M4|2 x 2 TB Seagate LP(Raid-0)|Plextor 755-SA|Auzentech Prelude 7.1|Seasonic M12-700|Lian-Li PC-6077B (Heavily Modded)

    Squire|Shuttle SD36G5M| R.I.P.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules