Okay folks, get your gear ready & count those stream processor amount !![]()
nice work - looks like nearly half the die size gone for gpu. please someone qualified compare the size to the rumored 480 shaders and dont forget to factor in 32nm =)
here is a 40nm redwood 5670 die shot to get one started:
now the architecture for redwood:
![]()
Last edited by Dimitriman; 11-03-2010 at 09:40 AM.
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
i think i counted 24 boxes of the same size in the GPU area.
anyone want to confirm?
Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
300Gb of MUSICA!!
Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/
K10 core: 9.69mm^2
Whole chip will be >220mm^2?
For the ay they are arranged there's the possibility of a dual ultra-threaded dispatch processor like barts.
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
...an earlier slide:
-
for some days we will have here AMD Financial day 2010, think, we will smarter![]()
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Two things that are very important to remember is the enhancements mae and its nemeses "Sandy Bridge". As i have said several times before sandy bridge is much stronger in the cpu department but not as strong as the llano in the GPU department. Now there is a thing i left out the ratios, i mean ya the llano's GPU is stronger but by how much or the CPU part of SNB is faster but by how much?
This was a part of discussion "Because we have no job's assigned thank you Intel" and the outcome was that a Intel GPU can reach the top not with huge number of shaders but with improved efficiency and speed. Intel does not want people to waste die space on stupid GPU'sthere were number of meetings held to decide if the current standard of GPU products were good enough to drive basic operations till Windows XP everything was a-ok but then Vista changed a lot of things it was concluded that for a entry level computer to run OS like Vista with bling they needed more GPU power at first they wanted to include a chip on the mobo itself but it worked out to suck a lot of juice and so it was decided to go on chip "Went down easy with most people" and then on die "Veery hard to digest people did not like that die space was being used for a dam GPU but had to be done"
Coming Soon
i think were coming to a point where cpu speed is fast enough, and its a transition to the gpu for anything that "really needed" a faster cpu. no point in waiting for scaling of the cpu, when if you code for scaling the gpu is more than ready (pending the code can be run on a gpu)
so if we compare a slew of benchmarks between the 2 chips (of a same tdp and price if possible, like what 35W and 250$ gets you) then i think the perf difference will sway ALOT depending on the benchmark, and its really a matter of which ones the user needs it for.
then im curious if in 3 years or so when its time to upgrade that same laptop, which one feels slower then, the one with a stronger cpu, or stronger gpu? i think that part is really most important considering people are keeping their computers longer than ever, which one will have the longer life.
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
Bookmarks