Two things that are very important to remember is the enhancements mae and its nemeses "Sandy Bridge". As i have said several times before sandy bridge is much stronger in the cpu department but not as strong as the llano in the GPU department. Now there is a thing i left out the ratios, i mean ya the llano's GPU is stronger but by how much or the CPU part of SNB is faster but by how much?



This was a part of discussion "Because we have no job's assigned thank you Intel" and the outcome was that a Intel GPU can reach the top not with huge number of shaders but with improved efficiency and speed. Intel does not want people to waste die space on stupid GPU's there were number of meetings held to decide if the current standard of GPU products were good enough to drive basic operations till Windows XP everything was a-ok but then Vista changed a lot of things it was concluded that for a entry level computer to run OS like Vista with bling they needed more GPU power at first they wanted to include a chip on the mobo itself but it worked out to suck a lot of juice and so it was decided to go on chip "Went down easy with most people" and then on die "Veery hard to digest people did not like that die space was being used for a dam GPU but had to be done"