Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Any "verdicts" on the Swiftech 58xx "unisinks"?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    1,166

    Any "verdicts" on the Swiftech 58xx "unisinks"?

    The one thread I've seen on the performance of the Swftech "unisinks" for the 58xx series cards was not very impressive. Anybody have any results to share?

  2. #2
    Chasing After Diety
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Absolutely Speachless :O
    Posts
    11,930
    OK...

    So basically a gutted stock heat sink with the fan removed cools better then a unisink.

    Ummm Gabe any comments?
    Nadeshiko: i7 990 12GB DDR3 eVGA Classified *In Testing... Jealous? *
    Miyuki: W3580 6GB DDR3 P6T-Dlx
    Lind: Dual Gainestown 3.07
    Sammy: Dual Yonah Sossoman cheerleader. *Sammy-> Lind.*

    [12:37] skinnee: quit helping me procrastinate block reviews, you asshat. :p
    [12:38] Naekuh: i love watching u get the firing squad on XS
    Its my fault.. and no im not sorry about it either.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    889
    I hear that if you remove the thermal pads and use AS5 (or some other paste) you can drop the temps dramatically. The Swiftech sync has a much larger surface area than the stock plate so it should cool much better. The short fall has to be the thermal conductivity of the pads used.
    Intel 8700k
    16GB
    Asus z370 Prime
    1080 Ti
    x2 Samsung 850Evo 500GB
    x 1 500 Samsung 860Evo NVME


    Swiftech Apogee XL2
    Swiftech MCP35X x2
    Full Cover GPU blocks
    360 x1, 280 x1, 240 x1, 120 x1 Radiators

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    56
    I actually started that thread that was linked in the first post. I got the unisink and have been totally underwhelmed with the performance. I immediately question the quality of the thermal pads used. Does anyone know of any quality, proven thermal pads that I could try instead? I guess using TIM instead could be possible, but I'm curious if the clearance is tight enough that paste would be viable?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    889
    I always use TIM. Using a razor, spread it over your component nice and thin. Tighten the heatsync down and enjoy! TIM always beats pads.
    Intel 8700k
    16GB
    Asus z370 Prime
    1080 Ti
    x2 Samsung 850Evo 500GB
    x 1 500 Samsung 860Evo NVME


    Swiftech Apogee XL2
    Swiftech MCP35X x2
    Full Cover GPU blocks
    360 x1, 280 x1, 240 x1, 120 x1 Radiators

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    1,166
    Quote Originally Posted by StAndrew View Post
    I always use TIM. Using a razor, spread it over your component nice and thin. Tighten the heatsync down and enjoy! TIM always beats pads.
    Can you personally confirm for us that the clearance is there....and there won't be anything shorting?

  7. #7
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    Quote Originally Posted by StAndrew View Post
    I hear that if you remove the thermal pads and use AS5 (or some other paste) you can drop the temps dramatically. The Swiftech sync has a much larger surface area than the stock plate so it should cool much better. The short fall has to be the thermal conductivity of the pads used.
    i suggest stop using as5.......try arctic ceramique...i tried this on contacts and it never killed any of my video cards....

    Quote Originally Posted by sgayol View Post
    I actually started that thread that was linked in the first post. I got the unisink and have been totally underwhelmed with the performance. I immediately question the quality of the thermal pads used. Does anyone know of any quality, proven thermal pads that I could try instead? I guess using TIM instead could be possible, but I'm curious if the clearance is tight enough that paste would be viable?
    if ou have a dc-dc circuits that aren't efficient you'll have a heat source...using heat sinks on them does increase the surface area for the heat to transfer...but you still need active cooling ie fans.

    if you use swiftechs heatsinks they'll do their job...but you'll still need fan/s even gabe had 100C ...using the heatsinks passively...

    Quote Originally Posted by Naja002 View Post
    Can you personally confirm for us that the clearance is there....and there won't be anything shorting?
    what shorting are you talking about? if there's a short your gpu is probably dead or just needs a refit..


  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    889
    Quote Originally Posted by Naja002 View Post
    Can you personally confirm for us that the clearance is there....and there won't be anything shorting?
    Sure can:

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...4&postcount=67

    This should help .
    Intel 8700k
    16GB
    Asus z370 Prime
    1080 Ti
    x2 Samsung 850Evo 500GB
    x 1 500 Samsung 860Evo NVME


    Swiftech Apogee XL2
    Swiftech MCP35X x2
    Full Cover GPU blocks
    360 x1, 280 x1, 240 x1, 120 x1 Radiators

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    1,166
    Bingo! Thanx!

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    56
    That's awesome! I'm gonna give that a shot tomorrow and report back my temps! Just to make sure, OCZ Freeze is non-conductive also, correct? I'll buy ceramique if need be, but I want to make sure what I have doesn't work before I go on an adventure to find that tomorrow!

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    74
    I'm sure you guys mean replacing the pads with tim on the mem and such right, or did they start putting pads on the cores?

    I'm looking to stay with air, but I was wondering if I could replace the pads with tim and cool it off a few degrees
    555x2 @ 4.2 / h50
    Crosshair 3 formula
    2x2g ripjaws
    5970, hx1000

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    889
    No pads on core, just memory and mosfets.
    Intel 8700k
    16GB
    Asus z370 Prime
    1080 Ti
    x2 Samsung 850Evo 500GB
    x 1 500 Samsung 860Evo NVME


    Swiftech Apogee XL2
    Swiftech MCP35X x2
    Full Cover GPU blocks
    360 x1, 280 x1, 240 x1, 120 x1 Radiators

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Usa
    Posts
    1,166
    Quote Originally Posted by sgayol View Post
    That's awesome! I'm gonna give that a shot tomorrow and report back my temps! Just to make sure, OCZ Freeze is non-conductive also, correct? I'll buy ceramique if need be, but I want to make sure what I have doesn't work before I go on an adventure to find that tomorrow!

    You want non-conductive and non-capacitive. I switched to MX-2 a couple of yrs ago because it fits the bill....plus it's good down to -45F.


    Doesn't say if it is non-capacitive:

    OCZ Freeze
    Last edited by Naja002; 02-09-2010 at 05:02 AM.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    56
    Ok. I know I can find ceramique at microcenter, so I'll pick some up today and see what happens.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    56
    Couldn't find ceramique, but I just grabbed a tube of mx-3 which says nice and big on the packaging that its electrically non-conductive and non-capacative! Results hopefully to come tonite

  16. #16
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by StAndrew View Post
    I always use TIM. Using a razor, spread it over your component nice and thin. Tighten the heatsync down and enjoy! TIM always beats pads.
    Sorry about hijacking the thread, but... I was actually considering attempting to use TIM on digital PWMs (both CPU and VTT) of x58 Classified instead of thermal pads to improve thermal performance... Stock heatsink is pretty good, so I think I might be able to lower the temps... Any opinion?
    Feel free to reply here or post here.
    Thanks.

    Edit: not going to bother with TIM I think, thanks to those who replied. The form of both PWM and heatsink seems to be more fit for thermal pads, so going to stick with what's intended.
    Last edited by zalbard; 02-09-2010 at 12:51 PM.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •