gtx 295 2048x1536 EXTREME stalker clear sky bench

[railmeat]

results...thoughts?

24/7 setup...

hardware in sig.



http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j11/bf2nut/2-5.jpg


http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j11/bf2nut/3-6.jpg


fuzzy,yes i know...showing temps,clocks..710 clock ...57c
http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j11/bf2nut/4-5.jpg



system runs great...not upgrading for awhile..

[Gaul]

Thats cool man. very2x strong gtx 295.....huge resolution !

[railmeat]

Thats cool man. very2x strong gtx 295.....huge resolution !

"very2x strong gtx 295"

?



thanks
thinking i should grab a q9550 for futureproofing sakes being im not going i7/i5 anytime so0n. i might pick 1 up tommorow for $160.i cant beat that price and i must be realistic needing a quad core so0ner or later.checking what stepping is best now for 9550,s...

i hate to say this but im being honest i dont think my board can push a quad like i want...more of a dual core board.i might just grab the 9550 and throw it in my closet..lol

i simply refuse to grab new p55 board/12gigs ddr3 ram/and i7 cpu

[WeHa]

"very2x strong gtx 295"

?



thanks
thinking i should grab a q9550 for futureproofing sakes being im not going i7/i5 anytime so0n. i might pick 1 up tommorow for $160.i cant beat that price and i must be realistic needing a quad core so0ner or later.checking what stepping is best now for 9550,s...

i hate to say this but im being honest i dont think my board can push a quad like i want...more of a dual core board.i might just grab the 9550 and throw it in my closet..lol

i simply refuse to grab new p55 board/12gigs ddr3 ram/and i7 cpu

nice GTX 295. anyway i think you should go for i7 series for gaming. i used a q9550 last week and just moved to i7. i get much improvements in real and synthetic gaming.

[railmeat]

nice GTX 295. anyway i think you should go for i7 series for gaming. i used a q9550 last week and just moved to i7. i get much improvements in real and synthetic gaming.

"nice GTX 295"

thanks.

"anyway i think you should go for i7 series for gaming. i used a q9550 last week and just moved to i7. i get much improvements in real and synthetic gaming."

any charts proving this and what games?i play cod4 right now.read this thread before u respond.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...76#post3998076

[Chumbucket843]

"nice GTX 295"

thanks.

"anyway i think you should go for i7 series for gaming. i used a q9550 last week and just moved to i7. i get much improvements in real and synthetic gaming."

any charts proving this and what games?i play cod4 right now.read this thread before u respond.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...76#post3998076

i moved from core 2 quad to i7 and games are so much smoother now. its like i am watching a movie or something. and seriously a p55 setup is a good at a steal of a price. once you see those 8 threads in task manager you get a little aroused if you know what i mean.

[Gaul]

@ ts = ehemmm 2x if u dont mind . can i request crysis warhead benchmarking ?? ALL MAX !!!

[iTravis]

That's impressive for a GTX 295, didn't know there's a Stalker CS Benchmark, I couldn't handle it running smoothly @2560x1600 with my X2 but since I just upgraded to a core i7, might wanna give it a shot again.

[railmeat]

That's impressive for a GTX 295, didn't know there's a Stalker CS Benchmark, I couldn't handle it running smoothly @2560x1600 with my X2 but since I just upgraded to a core i7, might wanna give it a shot again.

"That's impressive for a GTX 295"

thanks man,yea there fast :o this is on my 4.1 e8400...im sure a quad would do better.but it still ran hella fast...like butter.

[Moonman]

As requested, adding my results with water cooled 295 GTX.

24/7 config


Not 24/7 config (electric bill)

[railmeat]

As requested, adding my results with water cooled 295 GTX.

24/7 config


Not 24/7 config (electric bill)

interesting and thanks for posting!

curiuos why your sunshafts(hardest test) is min 7fps and mine runs 16fps?your gtx 295 is watercooled and a quad pushing it.hmm

your gtx clocks are 756 core vs mine at 710?

and my dual is 4.1 and your quad at 4.5?

im confused by these results,same bench,same res,same card,and he has a way higher clocked cpu(5.5ghz x2 vs my 4.1ghz x2).plus his 295 clocks are threw the roof compared to mine.mabye my 8 gigs ram help vs your 4 gigs??

thoughts?

[tiborrr]

It's a dual core, E8600, not quad. Dunno about the difference, perhaps driver revision, amount of memory (8GB vs 2GB)?

[railmeat]

It's a dual core, E8600, not quad. Dunno about the difference, perhaps driver revision, amount of memory (8GB vs 2GB)?

yes your right but...wait,lol hes at 5.5ghz x2,im at 4.1ghz x2.and his vid card clocks blow mine away.8 gigs ram make that much diff???

his lowest sun shader test is 7,mines 16?...weres his bottleneck at?




-------------
memory.


hes running ddr3 at 1400.....if he tries ddr3 at closer to 2000 with loose timings i think thats the diff right there.bandwidth..

im ddr2 1026 5-5-5-15 8 gigs..nothing real fancy but still overlocked ram from ddr 800.

[Gaul]

8 gigs ram make that much diff???

his lowest sun shader test is 7,mines 16?...weres his bottleneck at?

let me share, im not sure how much memory need for this bench !
RES 2048 x 1536, highest, bla...2x will eat much RAM....well to know that, easy use task manager while bench, so u can see how much RAM that benchie NEED !! I'll take post sample in CRYSIS WARHEAD GAMING...later.......soon

and if more than 6 GB / 6.5 GB i'm sure that MoonMan got bottleneck...cause he only 6 GB....even ddr3
u must cek how much ram does that bench need first.....

anyway i think u don't have u upgrade anything MAN.......already FAST / VERY NICE SYSTEM

[Gaul]

!! I'll take post sample in CRYSIS WARHEAD GAMING...later.......soon

this



CRYSIS WARHEAD, dx10, enthusiats, only res 1280 x 800, 8xaa, need more than 2 GB ram......see memory use 2.21 GB, so if i have only 2 GB will BOTTLE-neck !

maybe your stalker benchmark need more 6GB ram so moonman botlle check it out man !

WHY not use ULTRA PRESET ? only Extreme ?

[railmeat]

this



CRYSIS WARHEAD, dx10, enthusiats, only res 1280 x 800, 8xaa, need more than 2 GB ram......see memory use 2.21 GB, so if i have only 2 GB will BOTTLE-neck !

maybe your stalker benchmark need more 6GB ram so moonman botlle check it out man !

WHY not use ULTRA PRESET ? only Extreme ?

"anyway i think u don't have u upgrade anything MAN.......already FAST / VERY NICE SYSTEM"

im not saying for 1 sec his system is very fast.but its just weird how his sun shader test is %50 lower on min fps at 5.5ghz!and heavily overclocked 295...dont make sense



only Extreme option,no ultra ....

im thinking bandwidth(speed),not amount of ram.he has 4 gigs..more then enough + 2 gis on his card.he needs closet to 2000 speed with loose timings not 1400 tight timings?...i dunno



gaul get the stalker bench,its 30 sec download!

[Gaul]

gaul get the stalker bench,its 30 sec download!

well I have it already ! long time ago
and it has ULTRA ! did u miss something ? right under extreme

[Moonman]

I'll retry when I'll put my system under water cooling again.

@Gaul
Ultra preset is enabled in Vista and Win 7 (DX10). Me and railmeat are using Win XP so only Extreme preset.

[Gaul]

I'll retry when I'll put my system under water cooling again.

@Gaul
Ultra preset is enabled in Vista and Win 7 (DX10). Me and railmeat are using Win XP so only Extreme preset.

well, i'll understand now........

@ railmeat = can i post my stalker bench here ? compare ultra and extreme ?

[railmeat]

well, i'll understand now........

@ railmeat = can i post my stalker bench here ? compare ultra and extreme ?

of course u can bro