XtremeSystems Forums

Go Back   XtremeSystems Forums > Xtreme > Xtreme News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-03-2007, 08:28 PM   #1
StyM
Xtreme Cruncher
 
StyM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tropics
Posts: 1,245












Link to full review: http://www.hardspell.com/doc/hardwar...page17174.html
__________________




Last edited by perkam; 04-03-2007 at 11:54 PM.
StyM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 09:46 PM   #2
xVeinx
Xtreme Cruncher
 
xVeinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,056
mmmm.... Ouch
__________________
Core i7 920
EVGA x58 sli x3 (758)
OCZ DDR3 1600 cas 8 (6 gb)
WD Velociraptor
Seagate 1 TB 7200.12
Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11
Asus Xonar DX2
Corsair HX620
Dtek Fuzion v2
HWL stealth 240
xVeinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 11:04 PM   #3
perkam
Live Long And Overclock
 
perkam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,513
Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
OMG 48 Shaders only on GT ?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! Meaning two in sli would be slower than a single 8800gts ?!?!?!??!

Nvidia can go s.h.i.t. itself to heck...I can't believe my freakin eyes...nvidia pulled an ATI on the 8600GT...its SLOWER than the 7600GT...in some games !!!!!!!

Perkam
__________________

Star Trek Online Open Beta
Name: Captain Maxentius
Rank: Lt.
Ship: USS Kira
Class: Miranda-Class
Preferred Class: Akira-Class

Last edited by perkam; 04-03-2007 at 11:06 PM.
perkam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 11:12 PM   #4
xlink
Xtreme Addict
 
xlink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,475
Send a message via AIM to xlink
Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam View Post
OMG 48 Shaders only on GT ?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! Meaning two in sli would be slower than a single 8800gts ?!?!?!??!

Nvidia can go s.h.i.t. itself to heck...I can't believe my freakin eyes...nvidia pulled an ATI on the 8600GT...its SLOWER than the 7600GT...in some games !!!!!!!

Perkam
you mean that the x1600pro isn't a good card?
__________________

PHENOM II x4 720 @3.5Ghz // GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-UD4P // 4GB DDR2-800 4-4-4 // hd4870 512mb // CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX // ZEROtherm Nirvana // Intel X25-M 80gb // 2 * WD 640GB
xlink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 11:23 PM   #5
perkam
Live Long And Overclock
 
perkam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,513
Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
More good news:

http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showth...threadid=61518

And btw xlink, i have no desire to get into that right now.

Link to full review added to post made by Stym...the $100 7600GT is faster than the $150 "nex gen pos" 8600GT and the $150 7900gs BLOWS the $150 8600GT out of the water:





Welcome to 2006...Nvidia can keep its $200 GTS to itself, when u can get an 8800GTS for $50-$60 more, and an X1950XT for $10 more !!!!

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102067 .. not to mention, those $120 X1900GT's (which are ~7900GS performance) look mighty fine right now, plus they're 256-bit...

THE ONLY THING that would console me after Nvidia pulling this, is if it runs games with newer engines...at least 5-10 fps faster than the 7600GT...my main concern being how it will handle et:qw...

Perkam
__________________

Star Trek Online Open Beta
Name: Captain Maxentius
Rank: Lt.
Ship: USS Kira
Class: Miranda-Class
Preferred Class: Akira-Class

Last edited by perkam; 04-03-2007 at 11:39 PM.
perkam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 11:40 PM   #6
Nanometer
Xtreme Mentor
 
Nanometer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Thousand Oaks UCSB
Posts: 2,826
Send a message via AIM to Nanometer
Come on perkam, give Nvidia some time to get reasonable drivers to the market. Still sad nonetheless.
__________________
PC Lab Qmicra V2 Case SFF
i7 950 4.4GHz 200 x 22 1.35 volts | Cooled by Swiftech GTZ - CPX-Pro - MCR320+MCR220 | Completely Silent loads at 66c
GTX 260 EVGA SuperClocked Plain stock
12 Gigs OCZ Reaper DDR3 1600MHz) 8-8-8-24
ASUS Rampage Gene II | Xigmatek Northbridge cooler mounted to the stock system.
OCZ Vertex RAID-0(60Gig x 2) | WD 1000Gig Storage
Enermax Liberty 620| With a low speed yate, the stock ball bearing fan crapped out after 1 year of service.
Nanometer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 11:43 PM   #7
96redformula7
Xtreme Member
 
96redformula7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 450
Wow, so much for going the 8600 route. I think I might have a 8800GTS as soon as prices drop below $250.
__________________
HTPC - AMD Regor 240 - 4GB Gskill - AMD HD 5850 - Avermedia Duet - Harman Kardon avr247 - Surround Sound (Infinity Beta 50's, 10's, 360, and ed a2-300) - Samsung 46"

Desktop Powerhouse PC - Gathering dust due to high usage of HTPC as general pc now
96redformula7 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2007, 11:43 PM   #8
perkam
Live Long And Overclock
 
perkam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,513
Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanometer View Post
Come on perkam, give Nvidia some time to get reasonable drivers to the market. Still sad nonetheless.
Nvidia had time...all the time it needed...sitting there with their happy faces snickering at themselves thinking the fact that ATI hasn't put out their dx10 offerings means they get a free ride...

I mean...you want me to give them a break? REMEMBER that they bench these cards in their own labs...THEY SAW THIS AND STILL RELEASED THEM !!! And they could not have had updated drivers when they were testing the final cards before release...cos updated drivers come AFTER the card is released...so they saw these EXACT numbers and said "OK"....

I feel sick to the stomach....first the x1600, now the 8600...the $150 card should AT LEAST have been equal to the $150 cards out today...here its losing to its $100 previous gen counterpart.

Go fricken matrox...

Perkam
__________________

Star Trek Online Open Beta
Name: Captain Maxentius
Rank: Lt.
Ship: USS Kira
Class: Miranda-Class
Preferred Class: Akira-Class

Last edited by perkam; 04-03-2007 at 11:47 PM.
perkam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 12:12 AM   #9
Nanometer
Xtreme Mentor
 
Nanometer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Thousand Oaks UCSB
Posts: 2,826
Send a message via AIM to Nanometer
Then if these number still hold true, it's obvious what will happen to the price. Give it time and this card will find its matched price range in the market.
__________________
PC Lab Qmicra V2 Case SFF
i7 950 4.4GHz 200 x 22 1.35 volts | Cooled by Swiftech GTZ - CPX-Pro - MCR320+MCR220 | Completely Silent loads at 66c
GTX 260 EVGA SuperClocked Plain stock
12 Gigs OCZ Reaper DDR3 1600MHz) 8-8-8-24
ASUS Rampage Gene II | Xigmatek Northbridge cooler mounted to the stock system.
OCZ Vertex RAID-0(60Gig x 2) | WD 1000Gig Storage
Enermax Liberty 620| With a low speed yate, the stock ball bearing fan crapped out after 1 year of service.
Nanometer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 12:19 AM   #10
Warship
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 380
I'm with Perkam on this one.
__________________
That's just craptastic...
Warship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 12:32 AM   #11
GoriLLakoS
X.I.P.
 
GoriLLakoS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hellas-->Athens
Posts: 1,326
Send a message via MSN to GoriLLakoS
I've got 8600GT to...but the NDA ends at 17April !
I don't know how they managed to take out results...

The drivers are still not good..but they are updating them very very often.
__________________
When Mercedes brought their C111 to Talledega years ago and blew away the closed course record did it count? Yes..
That was a "factory" car and a "one of" that no one could buy and was never sold.
Records are records and that is a fact so get over it.
GoriLLakoS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 01:31 AM   #12
zerotol
Xtreme Member
 
zerotol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 153
wow pathetic performance atm , not even better then the old models
__________________
Now i am become death , the destroyer of worlds.
zerotol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 01:42 AM   #13
Starscream
Xtreme Mentor
 
Starscream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam View Post
THEY SAW THIS AND STILL RELEASED THEM !!!
thats the first lil problem they aint released yet.

and seeing that the card beats the 7600 in NFS Carbon but loses big time in Prey pretty much shows that the drivers are poorly optimized.

we could very easily see proper drivers released before or at launch.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Groucho Marx



i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me
Starscream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 03:06 AM   #14
Cybercat
Xtreme Addict
 
Cybercat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,565
Send a message via AIM to Cybercat Send a message via Yahoo to Cybercat
Perkam's completely overreacting.

It's plain to see that if this card can manage over 50% improvement over the 7600GT in one game, it has potential. There's most likely a driver issue with OpenGL games. Don't scream the end of the world having seen one brief benchmarking session.

The 8600GTS will be SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the GT too, 64 SPs versus 48 is over 30% more, plus the 25% clockspeed increase, means NVIDIA definitely has a chance to beat anything AMD releases. I can't wait to see that card benchmarked in games.
__________________
DFI LANParty DK 790FX-B
Phenom II X4 940 BE (0849APMW) @ 3.6GHz (18x200) w/1.48v
-cooling: Scythe Mugen 2 + AC MX-2
BFG GeForce 8800GTX OC2
8GB PC2-6400 G.Skill @ 800MHz (1:2) 5-5-5-15 w/1.8v
Seagate 1TB 7200.11 Barracuda
Corsair HX620W


Support PC gaming. Don't pirate games.
Cybercat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 03:14 AM   #15
Dainas
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Dainas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: under a bridge yelling riddles for toll.
Posts: 506
I wouldn't be so optimistic, although its obvious that there are some improvements to be garnered by improved drivers.

Still I think it would have been better if nvidia had slapped a 256bit bus on it, then they would have been sure to wipe the floor in lower midrange. There is no excuse that to this day 128bit memory rules the $100-200 pricepoint (after 5+ friggin years).
__________________
i7 860@3.9ghz---------Athlon X2 6000+
GSkill|4X2GB|CL9|1600-2x2GB DDR800
Asrock P55 Extreme-----MSI K9A2 Platinum
Agility120+F3 1TB-------F3 500GB
eVGA GTX 285-----------Diamond HD4850 512mb
Silverstone Zeus 850w--NeoHE 500
LG245WP+LP2475w-----LP2475w
Dainas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 07:41 AM   #16
FghtinIrshNvrDi
Xtreme Addict
 
FghtinIrshNvrDi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, MO
Posts: 1,214
Send a message via AIM to FghtinIrshNvrDi Send a message via MSN to FghtinIrshNvrDi Send a message via Yahoo to FghtinIrshNvrDi
blech.

Ryan
__________________
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

Abit IP35 Pro
Intel Core 2 Quad 6600 @ 3200 w/ Tuniq Tower
2x2gb A-Data DDR2 800
AMD/ATi HD 3870
FghtinIrshNvrDi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 08:02 AM   #17
perkam
Live Long And Overclock
 
perkam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,513
Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
Gentlemen, i'm not buying this at $150 so that its faster than the 7600GT by 5 fps....i would buy this over the 7900GS if it was faster than that !!! No amount of driver updates will change that...

Obviously if official performance reviews on the 17th find that this is not the case and it is on par with a 7900GS or X1950GT/Pro...then it has done its part...but that looks very unlikely.

The X1650XT had the EXACT thing happen where it got high marks in benchies but sucked in games...I don't want to have this happen to the 8600 or the X2600...but I'm not going to sit back thinking "oh yea it'll improve by a WHOLE lot" as i can tell what kind of limits even new drivers are bound by.

@ Cybercat, the price range for the GTS is $200 to $250...and even at $200 it will be compared to the x1950pro 512mb, the 7900gt and the $210 X1950XT.

Not to mention, if the gap between it and the 8800gts is too big, then paying $50 more for the 8800 is a far better option.

Perkam
__________________

Star Trek Online Open Beta
Name: Captain Maxentius
Rank: Lt.
Ship: USS Kira
Class: Miranda-Class
Preferred Class: Akira-Class

Last edited by perkam; 04-04-2007 at 08:18 AM.
perkam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 08:09 AM   #18
ZhaoYun
Xtreme Member
 
ZhaoYun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Corellia
Posts: 358
Send a message via AIM to ZhaoYun
Those are disappointing results.
__________________


Q6600 G0 @ 3.0Ghz | G.Skill DDRII 2x2GB PC8000 | DFI LP JR P45-T2RS | HD3850 | Corsair 620HX |

E6400 SL9T9 'Allendale' @ ??? | G.Skill DDRII 2x1GBHK (4-4-3-5) | Intel Bad Axe v3.06 | X1950PRO | Corsair 550VX |
ZhaoYun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 08:37 AM   #19
squilliam
Xtreme Member
 
squilliam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Miichiigan
Posts: 493
Send a message via AIM to squilliam
Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam View Post
Gentlemen, i'm not buying this at $150 so that its faster than the 7600GT by 5 fps....i would buy this over the 7900GS if it was faster than that !!! No amount of driver updates will change that...

Obviously if official performance reviews on the 17th find that this is not the case and it is on par with a 7900GS or X1950GT/Pro...then it has done its part...but that looks very unlikely.

The X1650XT had the EXACT thing happen where it got high marks in benchies but sucked in games...I don't want to have this happen to the 8600 or the X2600...but I'm not going to sit back thinking "oh yea it'll improve by a WHOLE lot" as i can tell what kind of limits even new drivers are bound by.

@ Cybercat, the price range for the GTS is $200 to $250...and even at $200 it will be compared to the x1950pro 512mb, the 7900gt and the $210 X1950XT.

Not to mention, if the gap between it and the 8800gts is too big, then paying $50 more for the 8800 is a far better option.

Perkam
they want you to spend that extra $60.
It will go down to about $180~160
__________________
Heatware
Ebay
Facebook
Myspace
Cooler Master Elite 360
Intel E6400@ 3.4Ghz Air (1.14v)
Abit IP35 Pro 1704MHz FSB
2x2GB DDR2 800@ 426MHz for 1:1 ratio
ATI 4830
200GB WD (Main), 1TB Samsung (Storage A), 400GB Samsung (Storage B).

Life is your name, your experiences, and the people you meet. 10% of how people treat you and 90% of how you react to them.
squilliam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 09:16 AM   #20
XS2K
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
XS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Let's wait and see how will it perform in the end since there are obviosly driver problems in PREY and 3DMARK03 + it performs very good in Carbon.
Quote:
Cybercat, the price range for the GTS is $200 to $250...and even at $200 it will be compared to the x1950pro 512mb, the 7900gt and the $210 X1950XT.
Those video cards aren't DX10 and I hope that the difference between 8600GTS and 7900GT/X1900XT will be seen in DX10 games.

Last edited by XS2K; 04-04-2007 at 09:19 AM.
XS2K is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 09:26 AM   #21
nn_step
YouTube Addict
 
nn_step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In textbooks
Posts: 17,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cybercat View Post
Perkam's completely overreacting.

It's plain to see that if this card can manage over 50% improvement over the 7600GT in one game, it has potential. There's most likely a driver issue with OpenGL games. Don't scream the end of the world having seen one brief benchmarking session.

The 8600GTS will be SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the GT too, 64 SPs versus 48 is over 30% more, plus the 25% clockspeed increase, means NVIDIA definitely has a chance to beat anything AMD releases. I can't wait to see that card benchmarked in games.
yes and I also have a definite chance to release a graphics card that is faster than the 8800Ultra this year, however it is rather unlikely; Just like the bolded text that you posted
__________________
Impossible is not a fact; it is an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration; it is a dare.
It's hardware that makes a machine fast. It's software that makes a fast machine slow.
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs
And all of that source is portable, except for this tiny kernel that you can (provably: I did it) re-write totally from scratch in less than a year without having /any/ prior knowledge.
-Linus Torvalds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANtpsunRYIs
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_lis...23537556D7AADB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTcFLp1uVZ4
Science is simply common sense at its best that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic.
http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2009/...raindamage.jpg
nn_step is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 09:31 AM   #22
kemo
Xtreme Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cairo
Posts: 2,280
Send a message via MSN to kemo Send a message via Skype™ to kemo
Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step View Post
yes and I also have a definite chance to release a graphics card that is faster than the 8800Ultra this year, however it is rather unlikely; Just like the bolded text that you posted
their is always a chance but who knows both AMD and Nvidia looks dump this time
__________________
Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
Asus X58 P6T
6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
XFX HD5870
WD 1TB Black HD
Corsair 850TX
Cooler Master HAF 922
kemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 09:43 AM   #23
[XC] leviathan18
Xtreme Cruncher
 
[XC] leviathan18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: venezuela caracas
Posts: 7,207
Send a message via MSN to [XC] leviathan18
im gonna wait for gorillakos results....
__________________
Fried, hoping computers are like phoenix....

YOU want to FIGHT CANCER OR AIDS join us at WCG and help to have a better FUTURE
[XC] leviathan18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:01 AM   #24
Vapor
Admin
 
Vapor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 11,783
Looks like DX10 for the sake of DX10.
__________________
Current Waterblock Testing
Roundup #2: Overall Comparison Thread, Alphacool Livingstone, Alphacool Niagara, Alphacool Yellowstone, D-Tek Fuzion V2, EK Supreme, EK Supreme LT, Enzotech Sapphire Rev A., Heatkiller 3.0 LC, Heatkiller 3.0 LT, Koolance CPU-345, Koolance CPU-350, Phobya, Swiftech Apogee GTZ, Swiftech Apogee GTZ SE, Swiftech Apogee XT
Vapor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 11:19 AM   #25
Frank M
Xtreme Addict
 
Frank M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: eu/hungary/budapest.tmp
Posts: 1,556
Hmm an x1950Pro for $170 even here with 20% VAT looks more and more appealing...

When will the first dx10 and dx10-only games appear? I think that will be a half-
generation of cards till then, and maybe something better will come along (like
X2800GTO or 8900GS).
__________________
Still chugs along: E2160 M0 (bsel mod) | GB 945GCMX-S2 | 2×1GB/800 | HD4850 | (modded CPU block | Heatkiller GPU-X - to be modded | 2×BIP2 | Laing DDC1-VC) | modded P-180 | e-mu 0404 | SeaSonic S12-600
mITX DC Atom-Ion machine: entering planning phase, waiting for A330ION board release
Laptops: F-S Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
Frank M is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
XtremeSystems