Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 54

Thread: CU-waterblock in CNC

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    35

    CU-waterblock in CNC

    Hello to you XS Long time reader, new poster.

    Me and a friend plan on making our own low-budget(very low!) watercooling, getting parts in the cheapest way possible, while still having some performance, and very low noise.

    While this is the first time eigher of us try watercooling, i have okay basic-knowledge of it. My friend has access to an CNC machine, so it is pretty obvious where we get our waterblock We only plan on cooling the CPU for starters.

    Anyhow, here is the idea I had.


    Blue is water-in, and red is water-out. Dont mind the weird pins, just me being a bit too lazy there .

    I hope that it is not too restrictive. Maybe we should make the block smaller in heigh, thus increasing the flow a bit(right?)

    Since this is a low-budget DIY watercooling, the pump we will use might be a cheap Eheim-1000 moddet to be inline. But i just dont know if the waterblock will require a stronger pump.

    We do not need extreme low temperatures, just something in the leauge of high-end air or something, but the noise must be kept at a minimum.

    I hope i am not asking very stupid questions or something.. But what do you think of the block-design?

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    2,819
    The design looks pretty good. but what is the red dot for?
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    387
    Quote Originally Posted by Bail_w
    The design looks pretty good. but what is the red dot for?
    Way to go on actually reading his post.

    With water cooling the heat does not get very far from the core of the CPU. There is no need to double back on yourself in the design, not to mention you might end up creating clearance problems with the tubes.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by Bail_w
    The design looks pretty good. but what is the red dot for?
    Water-out, did you read the first sentence beneath the picture?

  5. #5
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    USA/California/Sacramento
    Posts
    1,619
    The best desing is... coolwater on the core, and quick exit out of the block

    the rad is the exit of the water
    Asus P5B-Deluxe 0614
    Conroe E6400 @ 2.56ghz
    Team Xtreem DDR2 2x1GB @ 900
    ATI X1900XTX // MC14 Ramsinks -DEAD- Using spare 7900gt now
    Hitachi 80gb | Hitachi 80gb | Seagate 320gb
    Mountainmods U2-UFO Original Black \\ BenQ DVD-RAM
    Corsair Hx620
    Swiftech Storm r2 \\ Swiftech MCW60 \\ Swiftech MCW30 \\ Thermochill PA120.3 \\ Swiftech MCRES Micro \\ DDC+ Plexi Top

    Heatware | Guide To Current WaterCooling Components | Guide To WaterCooling and Leak Testing

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    35
    Well, second design.. Dont mind the sides, i am just a sketchup-fool.. The sides, which are closed without water now is supposted to be solid.
    Might start over on the design, but how is it now?. Now the water does not come direct on core, but a little below, but passes over core.

    Dont mind the weird angles and all the stuff that looks very.. wrong - i rushed it a bit Especially the left side is weird.


  7. #7
    The un-extreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    2,149
    tbh, that design doesnt look that good to me. keep playing with ideas though, they will always get better

    i5 3570K@ 4.8GHz 1.32v, 32GB Gskill 1866, Gigabyte g1 sniper m3
    HD7970@1125/1575 stock voltage
    1TB F1+2*128GB Crucial M4
    Silverstone 450w, no case
    2560*1440@120Hz overclocked catleap
    Steelseries G6v2+5600dpi modded logitech trackball

  8. #8
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    USA/California/Sacramento
    Posts
    1,619
    design* on my post... the thing is... in both youre designs... the water enters the block, then passes over the core, then exits the block..

    in the highest performing blocks... water enters AT the core, and exits somewhere immediately. So the water isnt there long enought to get very warm.
    Asus P5B-Deluxe 0614
    Conroe E6400 @ 2.56ghz
    Team Xtreem DDR2 2x1GB @ 900
    ATI X1900XTX // MC14 Ramsinks -DEAD- Using spare 7900gt now
    Hitachi 80gb | Hitachi 80gb | Seagate 320gb
    Mountainmods U2-UFO Original Black \\ BenQ DVD-RAM
    Corsair Hx620
    Swiftech Storm r2 \\ Swiftech MCW60 \\ Swiftech MCW30 \\ Thermochill PA120.3 \\ Swiftech MCRES Micro \\ DDC+ Plexi Top

    Heatware | Guide To Current WaterCooling Components | Guide To WaterCooling and Leak Testing

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    387
    Quote Originally Posted by ReD.SkY
    design* on my post... the thing is... in both youre designs... the water enters the block, then passes over the core, then exits the block..

    in the highest performing blocks... water enters AT the core, and exits somewhere immediately. So the water isnt there long enought to get very warm.
    His design is fine for the performance he is trying to reach. Only more recent waterblocks use the "on core" inlet, everything before that (like the Maze 4) use the idea he has drawn up.
    With that said, I would remove the inlet columns and extend the rows just a little. The columns won't do anything for where you have them.
    Last edited by Ominous Gamer; 06-14-2006 at 01:41 PM.

  10. #10
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    213
    looks a bit restrictive for a lower head pump, but that all depends on how many pins are really indeed used....
    e8400@4Ghz w/Fuzion V2|DFI p35 T2R|4x1Gb Ballistix D9GMH|Sapphire 4870|2x150WD Raptors|LianLI PC-A77|Nec 20WMGX2 x2|SB xfi Titanium

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    190
    If anything, increasing the number of fins will increase the surface area and therefore performance. I know there is a limit depending on the CNC machine and the heads you use, but if you can squeeze in more, that will help.

    Edit: Which app are you using do do the sketches?

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    35
    I use Google Sketchup, it's easy and free - even though i still suck at it
    http://sketchup.google.com/

    What is most restrictive - fins or pins?
    Right now they are combined, but would i benefit from cutting out one of them, and making it all fins or pins?

    About the CNC machine. I think i remember my friend talking about 3mm at the very least, preferable 4-5.

    I'll try to make another one tomorrow, one that enters in the centre, and going two ways and meeting on the side. I just dont know if i should focus on pins or fins.

    The model i make is in no way final-like, and i have no idea about how many pins we will be able to squeeze in - i'm just drawing the basic block-idea.

    btw. thanks for all the help so far. Great to get so many good answers in so little time.

  13. #13
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    USA/California/Sacramento
    Posts
    1,619
    round pins will be the least restrictive...
    Asus P5B-Deluxe 0614
    Conroe E6400 @ 2.56ghz
    Team Xtreem DDR2 2x1GB @ 900
    ATI X1900XTX // MC14 Ramsinks -DEAD- Using spare 7900gt now
    Hitachi 80gb | Hitachi 80gb | Seagate 320gb
    Mountainmods U2-UFO Original Black \\ BenQ DVD-RAM
    Corsair Hx620
    Swiftech Storm r2 \\ Swiftech MCW60 \\ Swiftech MCW30 \\ Thermochill PA120.3 \\ Swiftech MCRES Micro \\ DDC+ Plexi Top

    Heatware | Guide To Current WaterCooling Components | Guide To WaterCooling and Leak Testing

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by ReD.SkY
    round pins will be the least restrictive...
    But pins are more restrictive than fins, due to turbulance.

    At 3mm, if you want the least restriction, don't bother with the pins. You should however, bring the fins to a point, so the water stream splits, instead of hitting the top face.

    Edit: What CPU are you cooling?

  15. #15
    The Blue Dolphin
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Fuzzy_3D
    But pins are more restrictive than fins, due to turbulance.
    This was tested, and found to be not quite true. I don't have a link to this article, but it was tested by an expert.

    At the TS, look for reviews of waterblocks and try to make a block that is close to the best performing blocks on the market today. Look for small fins and pins and most surface area right above the core. Depending on the design of your waterblock 2-5mm base tickness is best.
    Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides

    Blue Reviews:
    Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
    Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
    Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case


    Blue Guides:
    Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself


    98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    387
    For your machine, and lack of skill of forming blocks... do not try pins.

    Use fins, just take some pointers from the Maze 4, its still an amazing block and easy to duplicate.
    Even swiftech can't machine the pin design correctly without breaking some and leaving crap in the block.

    Quote Originally Posted by alexio
    This was tested, and found to be not quite true. I don't have a link to this article, but it was tested by an expert.

    At the TS, look for reviews of waterblocks and try to make a block that is close to the best performing blocks on the market today. Look for small fins and pins and most surface area right above the core. Depending on the design of your waterblock 2-5mm base tickness is best.
    I just read an article that pitted 3 GPU blocks againist each other, the maze 4 lost by 2C temp wise, but had the least restriction, the other two blocks were pin designs.
    Last edited by Ominous Gamer; 06-14-2006 at 07:57 PM.

  17. #17
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    USA/California/Sacramento
    Posts
    1,619
    lol... why dont you just copy a MP-05 or something similar?
    Asus P5B-Deluxe 0614
    Conroe E6400 @ 2.56ghz
    Team Xtreem DDR2 2x1GB @ 900
    ATI X1900XTX // MC14 Ramsinks -DEAD- Using spare 7900gt now
    Hitachi 80gb | Hitachi 80gb | Seagate 320gb
    Mountainmods U2-UFO Original Black \\ BenQ DVD-RAM
    Corsair Hx620
    Swiftech Storm r2 \\ Swiftech MCW60 \\ Swiftech MCW30 \\ Thermochill PA120.3 \\ Swiftech MCRES Micro \\ DDC+ Plexi Top

    Heatware | Guide To Current WaterCooling Components | Guide To WaterCooling and Leak Testing

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    35
    hehe, I see that I made a minor discussion about pins vs fins

    I made a new design, in this one it enters right on core, exits at both sides, and then team up again on the other side of the block. I have realised that the CNC machine we will use might not be the best for small pins

    So.. How is this? Should i just forget the fins in the end, near the exit? Do they make the block unnessacary restrictive without giving performance?

    And again.. Thanks a lot guys - you are really helping here

    EDIT: We plan on using it on a conroe when it is out. What sizes should the block approximately be?
    Last edited by JacobHL; 06-15-2006 at 05:12 AM.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    This thread is right on the money as I'm contemplating some designs in my head right now. Thanks for the application info

    Do you have any 1inlet/2outlet block design ideas?

    Also, guys, how important is the depth of the block or height of pins/fins if you will?
    Which is better lower or higher?
    ________
    INDIAN COOKING
    Last edited by XS Janus; 05-12-2011 at 05:51 PM.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    367
    Answers to all these questions are readily available at Pro-Forums.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Emmaus, PA, US
    Posts
    1,274
    i think it would be sweet to use that same design but with that extra part on both sides and have a dual output block

    |Rig: AMD Athlon64 X2 6000+ Windsor|6gb DDR2 800|Dual 250gb Western Digital RAID0|8600GT|

    (12:16:17 AM) OC3D NoL: NOL EAT ANNOYING NOOBIE
    (12:16:19 AM) OC3D NoL: RAWRRRR

  22. #22
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    Quote Originally Posted by MarioMaster
    i think it would be sweet to use that same design but with that extra part on both sides and have a dual output block
    I think so too...

    Clokker thx for the link
    ________
    Montana marijuana dispensary
    Last edited by XS Janus; 05-12-2011 at 05:51 PM.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    746
    Basically mirror the outlet to the other side and would probably work pretty well. I suggest taking a look at how cathar designed the white water and using some pointers there. Might want to make the top of those fins lower, by the way.
    Take out your ex tonight... one bullet should do it.

    I've effectively killed my sig because it is no longer accurate. Oh well!

    A64 3200+ Newcie
    2x512 OCz PC3500 GX
    DFI NF3 250gb LPUT
    No Name 9700 that refuses to die!

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    190
    Here's what I came up with.



    Click to enlarge.

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    35
    Would something like this be allright? About the rounded sides, that is only because i just added something to my previous model


    I'm still thinking it might be a little too restrictive, but am I way off on that one?

    Fuzzy_3D - Maybe it is just me, but i think one end of that design will have still-water(Pardon my english). I mean, wont the water stand still, and just flow directly from intake to outtake?

    About the pump, we are currently thinking about Hydor L20/L30. Since this is a small loop, consisting only of CPU, will they be enough?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •