Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
?
![]()
My thoughts exactly.Originally Posted by Kunaak
Geforce, where did you hear that. I dont think SSE3 support and optimizations = IPC.
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
?
![]()
My thoughts exactly.Originally Posted by Kunaak
Geforce, where did you hear that. I dont think SSE3 support and optimizations = IPC.
Last edited by DrJay; 03-17-2005 at 05:10 AM.
Official ORB bottom feeder.
I think the point of that last screenshot that he showed us was to let us know that the Venice core can run stable in the -'s. Seeing as how the Vcore is so low he has not pushed the chip yet, just simply showing us that it will run with the superlow temps.Originally Posted by Ailleur
So, phase change only got you 100mhz?or maybe you haven't finished pushing it...I hope
I don't see any stability?Originally Posted by Ad Rock
Last edited by isp; 03-17-2005 at 05:16 AM.
The E revision chips have a redesigned memory controller and erreta fixes that increase the performance.Originally Posted by DrJay
The erreta fixes usually increase performance in any application that needs raw CPU power, but the affect of erreta is really negligible. But apps with need for memory bandwidth and especially games will probably see a gain of a few % when comparing Venice and Winchester at the same speed.
Its the same story as it was when we went from NewCastles to Winchesters, there was a very little, but consistant increase in performance on the Winchester.
Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
"<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
Main rig:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
Secondary rigs:
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.
Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors
Right. Very little because they were optimizations, which is what you are speaking of. I'm not an expert in this field but to the best of my knowledge, to change the instructions per cycle, you'd need to alter the architecture of the cpu.Originally Posted by The Coolest
Last edited by DrJay; 03-17-2005 at 05:15 AM.
Official ORB bottom feeder.
24 hours??? Lol. We've all been jumping on him to check out phase change every few minutes, we certainly haven't given him 24 hours to play with!!!Originally Posted by reject
I see that he can reach 3gig with lower volts than he needed on air...
-47c? I don't see no cold bug here!!!!
Things are looking gooooooooooooood...
S7e9h3n...![]()
![]()
THANK YOU!
Yeah, you're right. But its not optimizations, its errata fixes. Errata is basically a bug in the CPU, so when it gets fixed, performance increases by a small margin as the CPU doesn't have to deal with the consequences of these "bugs".Originally Posted by DrJay
In the first post I wanted, but forgot to say "He (Geforce4ti4200) probably meant increased performance and not actually higher IPC".
errata fixes increase the efficiency of the chip, they do not increase the IPC of a chip.
Last edited by The Coolest; 03-17-2005 at 05:51 AM.
Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
"<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
Main rig:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
Secondary rigs:
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.
Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors
No cold bugOriginally Posted by s7e9h3n
Now the only Q is how the mem controller tweaks do.
Thank you s7e9h3n for your efforts!![]()
![]()
3 GHz @ 1.36 V
nice, test it more, we wanna see moore![]()
and remember to test 4x256 MB RAM 1T and your other Venice![]()
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ NewCastle @ 240 x 10 = 2400 MHz @ 1.550 V
MSI K8N Neo Platinum 1.52 Beta BIOS
2x 512 MB DDR500 A-DATA Vitesta Hynix @ 240 MHz 1:1 2.5-3-3-7 1T 2.85V 24/7![]()
Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro R350
Enermax EG365AX-VE FMA 3.3V@32A 5V@32A 12V@26A
DVD-RW TEAC
Seagate 200 GB SATA + Maxtor 300 GB SATA
come on friday arrive soon plz so our friend s7e9h3n can play with that cpu and show to us how far can OC it with sub 0 temps (give the poor man a rest 4am and his awake)
Incoming new computer after 5 long years
YOU want to FIGHT CANCER OR AIDS join us at WCG and help to have a better FUTURE
Originally Posted by DrJay
that clock per clock advantage of the Venice should be true considered the new SOI process the venice has, i doudt it's because of the SSE3 support
if this is your first night in xtremesystems,
you have to overclock.
venice has sSOI process? or that is just reserved for the fx 57?
Incoming new computer after 5 long years
YOU want to FIGHT CANCER OR AIDS join us at WCG and help to have a better FUTURE
I'd settle for 10 minutes on Prime or maybe even a 3DMark run... I want to know what these things can actually run at.Originally Posted by TysonM
Current system:
Case: Modded Watercooled Jpac
CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 3.5GHz [1.47v] - OCCT stable
Mobo: DFI LanParty Jr T2RS @ 432fsb [1.37v]
RAM: Crucial Ballistix Tracer 4*1GB DDR2 @ DDR1095 (5-4-5-15) [2.2v]
HD: WD 300GB Velociraptor / WD 640GB Caviar
GPU: HD 4850 Crossfire @ (700 | 2200)
PSU: OCZ ModXstream 780w
Well your not gonna get 3D from him soon.... he only has a crappy PCI graphics card.Originally Posted by WiCKeD
I think thats what I read....![]()
Way toooooo much info in these threads.
.................................................. .................................................. .............................................
[+] Abit AN8 Fatal1ty [+] A64 3500+ NC [+] XP120 [+] 2x256 G.Skill DDR600 "LA" [+] MSI 6600GT [+] OCZ 420w Powerstream [+]
.................................................. .................................................. .............................................
is the venice gonna be cheaper or expensiver than the winchester?
yes he has a 9800 pro
Incoming new computer after 5 long years
YOU want to FIGHT CANCER OR AIDS join us at WCG and help to have a better FUTURE
Very very niceGlad AMD worked the bugs out
NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)
Heatware: 13-0-0
Originally Posted by Sentential
As am I... I just "inherited" 4 air conditioners...![]()
AMD Athlon 64 3700+ @ 300x10________15" Macbook Pro
2x 512mb Mushkin DDR _______________2x 1Gb DDR2
Sapphire X850XT____________________X1600M
DFI Ultra-D_________________________2.16Ghz Merom C2D
Lian-Li PC7A________________________OS X/XP
PCP&C 610w Silencer
I really don't see any negatives with 3 Ghz at only 1.36. Thats very impressive to me - even non stable - give the guy some time to post his results! A bit of patience. Thanks for your efforts s7e9h3n![]()
BTW - my winnie is suprisingly robust as far as vcore is concerned. I accidently left it at 2.60 on 1.8vcore. Using water cooling. I was running F@H. I came back 8 hours later, and it was still running at a CPU temp of 64C - this was also putting 3.6v through my BH6. I mention this just to illustrate than my winnie isn't a fragile little flower, so I hope the Venice isn't either![]()
AMD 3800 X2, DFI NF4 SLI-DR, 2 Leadtek 6800GT, OCZ 3200 Platinum LE, OCZ 600.
holy ba jeebus
mobo: strix b350f
gpu: rx580 1366/2000
cpu: ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
ram: 32 gb gskill 2400 @ 3000
psu: coarsair 1kw
hdd's: samsung 500gb ssd 1tb & 3tb hdd
Well, someone had his FX-55 running for weeks with severe condensation problems - there was water all over (he realized this when he checked twice, but fortunatley had been using dielectric grease on the pins). The system got quite unstable at times, but the mobo and FX-55 survived. That's what I call robust.Originally Posted by :banana::banana::banana:in
Bookmarks