3800+ Venice Screenies (Post #1 = FAQ)

[s7e9h3n]

12x240 - This needed a little bump (+3.3%) in Vcore

[s7e9h3n]

Here's 10x280 @ same Vcore as above

[s7e9h3n]

Ok, 2800 is a breeze for this chip at close to default Vcore, but anything beyond that required much larger voltage increases.....

Here's 10x290 - In bios, I believe it was set to default vcore (1.4) + 5%

[s7e9h3n]

Now I've only got a couple of more screenies. Since I didn't want to take too big of a risk (yet) with this chip, I limited the Vcore I was feeding it. Te highest I used was 1.45 + 8.3% in bios. This was the Vcore used for these last two shots. As I now look at them, I'm figuring I could give the 3800+ ~.1 more vcore and be relatively safe in terms of temps (voltage, on the other hand, may not be as safe.)

SuperPi could not finish 1m at this voltage, but I'm sure it would be fine with a little bump.....

[ozzimark]

hmm, so it's fine up to a certain speed, then any more voltage is kinda a moot point. seems typical of the 90nm chips i've seen. time to switch the thing over to the phase change.

[Ref]

I never heard of A64 dieing from too much voltage, if the temperature was right (e.g. under 50°C AIR).

Try to run 250x12, it'll be easier for CPU than 300x10.

And remember that you have 2 chips, not one

[Ref]

Looks awesome
2.886 GHz @ 1.4 V
I think we will see 3 GHz on air VERY soon
If AMD has such great yields with Venice and 90 nm then
No surprise they are going to release FX-57 so soon

[ozzimark]

looking very very good. i'm impressed by those temps, even if the fx-55 cooler is respectable.
keep em coming

[koei]

More! Push it further!!

[blueworm]

12x240 - This needed a little bump (+3.3%) in Vcore

Bah that just take's up the slack caused by the voltage drop.

[|-jokker-|]

Wonderfull chip man
I want one , can you test with -xxºC ??
That would be great

congrats

[matt9669]

All we wanna know is - cold bug?

Very nice, very nice