Originally Posted by Kunaak
Sounds promising, but I think it should be kept a secret until all the bugs are worked out. Who knows someone could use one of those bugs to exploit the program.
Originally Posted by Kunaak
Sounds promising, but I think it should be kept a secret until all the bugs are worked out. Who knows someone could use one of those bugs to exploit the program.
Level 80 UD Death Knight on Murmur (Beta)
no internet connection.
less then 100k download.
takes about 1 minute to run.
all big bugs, have been worked out.
only the little ones remain.
nit picking stuff.
like the time reported isn't accurate.
for me it reports 110 seconds.
but it really takes 40 seconds.
easy fix I think, since the first version had the proper time down.
just the guys off in never never land dreaming away till tommorow...
time for patience to kick in.
Here's a classic 3d2001 fake:
Obtained by yet another method not mentioned here.
Let's just say it involves changing the reference clock oscillators on the mainboard. This would be a hack that is very hard to detect if done in a less obvious way then shown above. The only method to prevent that would be to validate the system clock with a verified time server on the internet.
Killeroy.
GA-K8NF-9, A64 3200+ Winnie Week 44, 2*512MB Samsung TCCC, Sparkle 6600GT
can someone check this screenshot
www.bash.org-----own3s
whats wrong? I few of these latest Winchesters can do things like that. Besides theres a thread for this...something about post here to verify a CPU-Z shot or something
jjcom
EDIT: I spelled "jjcom" wrong lol
Last edited by jjcom; 02-16-2005 at 01:03 PM.
serious. 2500 at nearly 1.4v? ok
www.bash.org-----own3s
checksum does matches, however, older CPUZ is to easy to cheat with, hence XS Staff' Official "we won't check pre CPUZ 1.26 screenies" statement. But anyway, Yes there is a thread for checksum verification, sticky in XOC.Originally Posted by ImmortalNoob
Chip isn't really all that spectacular, I've actually never even bothered to see what my NC which does 2650 air, and 2.5 at default voltage will run undervolted, but it wouldn't surprise me to see similar results.
Well, tried to lover volt at 2500 MhzOriginally Posted by Karnivore
-And the temp? -132 C
Best OC Regards
Tom Holck
Denmark
The Homeland of nVentiv and Asetek
wow very nice... undervolting is very good for barebone user like me! my cpu is much colder with 1,1 than with 1,525.Originally Posted by Tom Holck
E2160 @ 360x9, max 390x9 watercooled
GA-P35-DS3
Cellshock D9GMH @ 545mhz cl5-5-5-5-15
Palit 7300gt 500/1000 @ 780/1600 watercooled
Tom Holck
Killer! Is it stable at those speeds with those voltages?
i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60Originally Posted by CompGeek
Yes, Pifast and M1 tried. It's not the CPU that is special. It's because of the supercooling. No big dialOriginally Posted by IvanAndreevich
Best OC Regards
Tom Holck
Denmark
The Homeland of nVentiv and Asetek
Great thread here, Kunaak... :thumbsup:
Didn't know people would bother to use apps like this to fake their results (only knew of Photoshoppers). Didn't even know of apps like this
And again, I learnt something new.
Ah, have to add something here:
Prime95. A friend of mine accidently found out, there is an easy method to cheat. If you are running the torture test and you put your system in suspend mode, Prime will count the time on and on. Restarting the rig you will get (after stopping the torture test of course) a result as if you were running it for several hours without problems and w/out any error. And your system did not even sweat doing it
Dunno if it still applies to the actual version though, I think it's been 6months ago...
Just a little FYI, there are other ways of cheating:
http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/P4-373e/4.shtml and following pages.
In this case, it actually turned out that the main thing causing this was the termination voltage setting on the mainboard, increasing it countered the heat effect on the clock gen and completely negated the "cheating".
( http://www.lostcircuits.com/motherboard/asus_p5ad2e/ )Apparently, the same issues we found were observed by others as well and as so often, more eyes see more and, therefore, it is not surprising that we got some feedback on the issue as well along with a number of suggestions. Among the more interesting suggestions was the one to set the FSB termination voltage to a fixed value of 1.3V, supposedly, this would completely take care of the problem. Needless to say that we were rather curious ourselves.
As mentioned in this thread before, 3DMark2001 was one of the few benchmarks completely immune
that was a very interesting article, and a very strange way to cheat a benchmark, but I am glad to know it, and how easy it can be to manipulate a 915 or 925 board.
Edit! LOL seems I was a bit too late with LC linkage
If this has been discussed please forgive me, that is 925XE chipset PLL issue. This screenie is of a test system I assembled for DDR2 testing purposes. I have no cheat programs at all, I think the whole idea of cheating is horrible. Anyway, the following screenie is of an Abit AA8XE 925XE chipset board, I have fluctuating PLL after 270fsb where under stress system/PLL downclocks bus. There is NO CPU throttle at all, this is the bus causing lowering of clocks. This in effect causes the pause or stutter cheat. Michael Schutte covered this in a Lost Circuits article people should read http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/P4-373e/8.shtml
Anywho, take a gander! All P4 775 results at high bus speed in non verified benches are suspect to me at this point
Also, during benching I can see cpu/bus speed fluctuate wildly while no throttle is recorded by throttlewatch.
Last edited by JNav89GT; 01-23-2005 at 07:46 AM.
it's never fast enough!
In this case, the apparent players are temperature and voltage ... I'd be glad to report something new but that's what it comes down to.
That is, if the bus termination voltage is increased, the cheat goes away. This sounds somewhat strange but keep in mind that the termination voltage is in reality the bus supply voltage, that is, the voltage at which the entire bys is powered and which is apparently used for center-tap termination by accident - hence the name.
In other words, it appears necessary to adapt the bus components, including the PLL to the higher frequencies by increasing the voltage, otherwise, heat will cause the PLL to slow down. Really no rocket science involved here. One thing to watch out for though is that increasing VTT will cause the entire system to run a bit hotter, that includes the CPU as well. I am not sure why this is the case and I don't have hard numbers that are statistically sound -- just an observation.
I am not sure which boards other than the ASUS series have the termination voltage setting user accessible.
Well with the 775 platform issue ,it's not an attempted cheat but a platform bug that causes the problem. I suspect all high P4 results on 775 unless it's from well respected member like Fugger or Kyosen.
it's never fast enough!
Umm do those new 3DMark '03 / '05 patches do ANYTHING?
i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60Originally Posted by CompGeek
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My Work: LittleDevil's SS Cases, LittleDevil's SS Worklog, LD CPU-R1 Dice/LNē Pots, LD GFX-R1 Dice/LNē Pots,
LittleDevil LD PC-V10, LittleDevil's K-Type Temp Display, |EMAIL: ldphasechange@gmail.com
LD PC-V8 Watercooling Cases: LINK
LD PC-V8 ATX/HPTX Watercoolig PC case with 10 expansion slots: LINK NEW!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.ldcooling.com
Find US on Facebook
hey guys, I just saw this ORB link, and I just dont understand how a clawhammer at 240x10 and x800xtpe at stock could get this high of a score: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8382135
if its not fake, then props to him
(is this posted in the wrong thread?)
Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R rev 2.0
Intel Core i7 950
2x MSI N460GTX Cyclone 768D5/OC in SLI
Corsair 6GB (3x2gb) DDR3 1600mhz C7
Silverstone ST75F-P 750w psu
Samsung F3 1TB
MY HEATWARE
It looks pretty legit. None of the individual scores are far out of sync with the others.
For those of you about to post:
That link is a real OC.... He's the son of OJDR2001!!Originally Posted by Zanr Zij
Last edited by SwimmerBoy; 02-16-2005 at 12:17 PM.
Desktop: A64 Opteron 148@2650Mhz AC | DFI LANParty UT RDX200 | 2x1Gb TeamElite @ 240Mhz FSB | XFX 8600GT DDR3
| 2xHitachi 160Gb SATA(RAID0) + 1xSamsung 320Gb SATA | TDK 1616N | Samsung 70S+Samtron 55E | Genius Slim KB19 + Creative 5000 | Chieftec 360W |
------------ SwimmerStyle ------------
Notebook: Acer Aspire 1691WLMi | P-M 1.6Ghz Sonoma @ 1804MHz & 600MHz BUS | 1280Mb 333MHZ @ 190Mhz FSB
| ATi x600 64Mb | Toshiba 80Gb 5400RPM | Samsung SN-S082H | 15.4" WXGA Acer CrystalBrite | Microsoft Optical 4000 |
Anti Cheating version of Super Pi can be downloaded here.
hopefully we don't get some dumbass that thinks this is a challenge for his programming skills and goes and writes a cheat program for it, like we had with people trying to break CPUZ 1.26...
cna u plz check this??? i think he did super pi at highter frquenzy and then took the screen lowering frequency...thx
Bookmarks