-
as pointed out buffered sandra is not a huge deal, it tells us something but unbuffered and the ddr500 2,2,2,5 vs ddr600 2.5,3,3,7 won't be that far apart i wouldn't think. Also wanna see 3dmark results to show general performance.
another thing is, jsut cos the tccd will run high on lower voltage, doesn't make that everyday use and bh-5 not. simply put there are a shedload of people that have run up to 3.5v for long periods of time and not had a stick die. its about running voltage that those memory chips can handle, tccd likes less voltage, that doesn't make runnning at 2.75v inherantly better. tbh i'd ru n3.7v without question all day long without caring. just not got a chip/board combo that wants to run high enough fsb to warrant that at the moment,
also, ath 64 deaths, other than that basically initial thread what, almost a year ago where only a few people actually had deaths and almost entirely all of them were on chaintech(early boards) or modded vdimm shuttle boards where almost all of them died from fluctuations, basically unsafe mod. Since then i ain't heard anything about dying ath 64's. Sure a few die here or there, no product in any history doesn't have some faulty components. My first 3200+ back last, sept? august? i ran at 3.3v for like 7 months straight before it was sold, to my m8, with the board, and its been at the same since then.
Mail Me | 3500+ , dfi sli-dr, g-skill la, 2x6800gt, 600w pcz, stacker case, air cooled
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks