Quote Originally Posted by msimax View Post
nice man
it's slow.

Just to show proper scaling and how much time goes into my findings.......

Projected proper efficiency is roughly 9.5 seconds shaved per 100 MHz at rather horrible memory speeds.

This means the above run was "slow" ( equivalent of a 4.9 run ) still even admittedly a poor result it was enough to hit sub 7........it is not hard.

4.0
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8-24 asrock.jpg 
Views:	327 
Size:	342.7 KB 
ID:	132384

4.6
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	7-27 asrock.jpg 
Views:	260 
Size:	388.7 KB 
ID:	132385