it's slow.
Just to show proper scaling and how much time goes into my findings.......
Projected proper efficiency is roughly 9.5 seconds shaved per 100 MHz at rather horrible memory speeds.
This means the above run was "slow" ( equivalent of a 4.9 run ) still even admittedly a poor result it was enough to hit sub 7........it is not hard.
4.0
4.6
![]()





Reply With Quote
Bookmarks