Luxmark
CPU
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K HDT 1430 1411 -1% Room 118 111 -6% Sala 199 196 -2% Luxmark CPU -3%
GPU
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K HDT 1648 3267 98% Room 75 245 227% Sala 167 450 169% Luxmark GPU 165%
CPU+GPU
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K HDT 2532 3963 57% Room 163 296 82% Sala 295 557 89% Luxmark CPU+GPU 75%
Scenes HDT/Room/Sala
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 08:48 AM.
Nuclearus MC
Single
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K Fibonacci 5941 6152 4% Factorial 4654 5053 9% Ferma 4459 4563 2% Brute Force 5342 5529 4% Matrix add 4917 4410 -10% Matrix mul 4592 4016 -12% Quick sort 5136 5480 7% Queens 4032 4220 5% ALU Single 1% Hyperbolic cosec 5837 6163 6% Hyperbolic tan 4947 5191 5% Digit Pi 7541 8385 11% Mandelbrot 8149 8149 0% Picture Morphing 5953 6073 2% Factorial 1796 3174 77% Prime 6351 6625 4% Digit e 4502 5022 11% FPU Single 14% Nuclearus Single 8%
Multi
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K Fibonacci 23938 24573 3% Factorial 17695 20072 13% Ferma 14495 18406 27% Quick sort 12840 17020 32% ALU Multi 18% Hyperbolic cosec 4834 6839 41% Digit e 3657 5358 46% Picture Morphing 3604 5239 45% Prime 24049 26251 9% FPU Multi 35% Nuclearus Multi 27%
Memory
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K L1 Speed MB/s 93714 129179 38% L2 Speed MB/s 36531 31476 -14% Mem read MB/s 8233 7888 -4% Mem write MB/s 3574 3574 0% Nuclearus Memory 5%
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 07:51 AM.
PCMark 8
Tried to run the OCL version but specs sayd device disabled and listed no opencl devices.
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K Webbrowsing Amazonia (sec) 0.13 0.13 0% Webbrowsing JunglePin (sec) 0.35 0.35 0% Writing (sec) 5.01 4.81 4% Casual Gaming (FPS) 32.8 34.9 6% Video Chat Playback (FPS) 30.0 30.0 0% Video Chat Encoding (ms) 128.3 134.3 -4% Photo Editing (sec) 0.9 0.87 3% PCMark 1%
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 08:02 AM.
ratGPU
Results look odd, will retest.
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K CPU (sec) 3694.8 957.5 286% GPU (sec) 562.3 s 179.4 213%
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 08:06 AM.
ScienceMark 2
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K Molecular Dynamics 1002.13 863.25 -14% Primordia 1106.98 1157.41 5% Cryptography 1304.91 1574.36 21% STREAM 3036.93 3069.53 1% Memory 2763.82 3138.42 14% BLAS/FLOPs 2134.58 2213.22 4% ScienceMark 2 5%
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 08:13 AM.
Solidworks 2013
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K Processor (sec) 57.4 56.6 1% EA (sec) 34.1 31.9 7% Rendering (sec) 38.6 35.8 8% CPU 5% Grafic (sec) 35.3 33.0 7% GFX 7%
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 08:20 AM.
Specvieperf
10 single 1280x1024
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K 3dsmax 22.96 20.42 -11% catia 16.06 17.02 6% ensight 27.21 22.93 -16% maya 51.17 45.68 -11% proe 13.02 14.06 8% sw 33.95 34.54 2% tcvis 9.26 8.73 -6% ugnx 14.63 10.94 -25% Specvieperf 10 single -7%
10 multi 1280x1024
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K 3dsmax 42.20 36.24 -14% catia 37.79 34.04 -9% maya 94.80 97.50 3% proe 31.98 28.80 -10% sw 72.32 60.86 -16% tcvis 18.40 9.42 -49% Specvieperf 10 multi -16%
12 single 1900x1060
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K catia 13.38 14.82 11% creo 9.74 14.65 50% energy 0.19 0.21 11% maya 10.31 14.24 38% medical 2.59 4.18 61% showcase 7.60 8.56 13% snx 6.02 4.08 -32% sw 20.55 25.55 24% Specvieperf 12 single 22%
10 single / 10 multi / 12 single
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 08:41 AM.
Sunspider Javascript
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K Total (msec) 214 205.5 4% Sunspider 4%
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 08:54 AM.
Truecrypt
Encryption
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K AES 1.6 1.9 19% Serpent 180 233 29% Twofish 299 359 20% AES-Twofish 252 306 21% AES-Twofish-Serpent 105 134 28% Serpent-AES 161 215 33% Serpent-Twofish-AES 105 135 29% Twofish-Serpent 102 145 42% Truecrypt Encryption 28%
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K AES 1.6 1.9 19% Serpent 181 238 31% Twofish 357 415 16% AES-Twofish 292 343 17% AES-Twofish-Serpent 111 141 27% Serpent-AES 160 213 33% Serpent-Twofish-AES 112 140 25% Twofish-Serpent 120 151 26% Truecrypt Decryption 24%
Mean
A8-6500
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K AES 1.6 1.9 19% Serpent 181 235 30% Twofish 328 387 18% AES-Twofish 272 325 19% AES-Twofish-Serpent 108 138 28% Serpent-AES 160 214 34% Serpent-Twofish-AES 108 138 28% Twofish-Serpent 116 148 28% Truecrypt Decryption 25%
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 09:10 AM.
Unigine Heaven
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K HWBox Basic 549.6 684.2 24% HWBox Extreme 166.8 356.0 113% Unigine Heaven 69%
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 09:14 AM.
Wprime
Benchmark A8-6500 A10-7700K 1.55 32M (sec) 20.0 14.6 37% 1.55 1024M (sec) 618.6 442.7 40% 2.10 32M (sec) 20.8 15.2 37% 2.10 1024M (sec) 696.3 468.0 49% Wprime 41%
1.55 / 2.10
A8-6500
A10-7700K
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 09:21 AM.
Lots of results! Thanks!
I have problem with my Kaveri (or motherboard) as it doesn't like PCIe 3.0 cards at all and hangs very frequently. With R9 290 it also is impossible to increase base clock by even 1MHz. With Richland CPU everything works as it should so I suspect it is Kaveri at fault here
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
I have an GTX 650 here, which is also PCIe3 will cross check later, gotta add som more result tables first. Thought i can remount watercooling today but those tables are alot of work.
Last edited by justapost; 01-26-2014 at 09:27 AM.
New GPU-Z announced with Kaveri support. http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads...-gpu-z-v0-7-6/
Also interesting:
Delidded A10-7700K: http://www.techpowerup.com/197051/am...de-lidded.html
Kaveri performs better with Dual-Ranked DIMMS: http://www.techpowerup.com/197145/am...ms-report.html
yes, its logical with dual sided memory chips at RAM. Its better for all CPUs, but for iGPU more
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Hi there FlanK3r,
Yes it makes sense after reading the wiki article here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_rank. Do you know if there is an bios parameter to controll the delay for rank switches?
Not really related but also interesting infos about driver strengt settings. http://www.techarp.com/showFreeBOG.a...ng=0&bogno=403 and another one about the more ususal memory settings http://www.techpowerup.com/articles/overclocking/64
Last edited by justapost; 01-27-2014 at 11:45 AM.
Funny, the vr circuit is marketed as 8+2. In that article they also mention that configuration but later they referet to the pwm controler spec here which is obviously ab 4+2 controller. So it's more like 4(x2)+2. Did not realize that the board uses an digital pwm. Last board with an digital pwm i owned was an dfi 790 am2+ board and the pwm section ran really hot there as well. Also it required abit more power idling.
However after reading this
On a circuit with four phases, the PWM signals will be delayed in such way that phases will be activated in sequence: first phase 1 is activated, then phase 2, then phase 3 and then phase 4. While one phase is turned on all others are turned off. In this case, each phase will be working 25% of the time.</p><p>The more phases you have, less time each phase will be turned on. As explained earlier, this makes each phase to dissipate less heat and each transistor to work less, which provides a higher life-span to this component.
it makes sense to use two mosfet's for each phase, should provide more power/stability for each phase than an 8x1 which would just reduce the the working time of an phase to 1/8 of the time.
Last edited by justapost; 01-27-2014 at 11:43 AM.
@Lightman, tested the GTX-650 and it is PCIe3x16 and works without problems with an 105MHz BCLK. Firmware from Bios update via Internet worked as an charm.
Trying the v2.7 Bios here, but no 4.7GHz in reach, still hitting the same wall at 4.6GHz and still seeing high Radeon temps. The cTDP option has disappeard completely in this version.
Did abit more testing with the new bios. At 4.4GHz and 4.5GHz I require ~0.02-0.03V less for stability. At 4.6GHz however the radeon temps are still very high and cause the system to power off as soon as they reach 64C. In fact i need 1.55V now to pass the open porous linux benchmark sometimes, which required 1.5325V earlier and worked always. Thinking about deliddling noow, but might just leave it alone and stick with 4.4GHz at 1.3875V or 4.5 at 1.4625V now.
New Bios 2.81 beta ftp://europe.asrock.com/bios/FM2+/FM...+(2.81)ROM.zip
Amazing testing and thread, thank you very much for your work...
Thank you for the positive feedback, you're welcome.Originally Posted by KiSUAN
Been testing an somewhat save overclock over night. System had frozen a few times yesterday at 4.4GHz with CPUVID 1.3875V and 1.4V but i also had lowered NBVID down to 1.15V and MEM to 1.5V. So I used CPU 4.4GHz/1.425V/LLC80% NB 1.8GHz/1.2V/LLC80% MEM 2133MHz/1.55V and ran prime95 for ten hours. Had fans and pump running at the lowest speed. In idle CPU temps are at ~35C and Radeon temps report -1C (should be calibrated to be correct at 65C). During the test cpu reached 55C at max it was ~50C most of the time. Radeon temps maxed out at 51C.
Could not yet get the memory run at 2400MHz. When i tried to adjust the settings manual i found that tWR sould be set to 20 but the board only allows an max of 16. Looking at AIDA64's SPD readings 945MHz is the last setting that fit's within board specs in regards to tWR (fivth number in the second group of timings).
Thanks for doing it!
I will RMA my Kaveri and wait for replacement. What also was weird about this sample was it wouldn't boot up at all on vCore below 1.33V even underclocked to 2.5GHz
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''
Hope you get an better replacement chip soon, that was bad luck at the wrong time. Did your board also choose an richland type of nb voltage in manual mode? Mine picked 1.275V but when i ran it at auto settings 1.1375V was used.Thanks for doing it!
I will RMA my Kaveri and wait for replacement. What also was weird about this sample was it wouldn't boot up at all on vCore below 1.33V even underclocked to 2.5GHz
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks