Nvidia unveils the GeForce GTX 780 Ti

[[XC] Oj101]

I can confirm that NVIDIA has killed DP performance with the 780 Ti. Using 1/3 DP doesn't make financial sense, as either it means selling the card for $1500+ or hurting their own workstation market. I'm disappointed, I use 64 bit floating point operations and the old GTX 580 offers more power than the 780 Ti. Ah well.

[bamtan2]

I can confirm that NVIDIA has killed DP performance with the 780 Ti. Using 1/3 DP doesn't make financial sense, as either it means selling the card for $1500+ or hurting their own workstation market. I'm disappointed, I use 64 bit floating point operations and the old GTX 580 offers more power than the 780 Ti. Ah well.

please remind the class exactly what you use the titan advantage for

[Iconyu]

please remind the class exactly what you use the titan advantage for

Demoed on Titan, I don't think it would do so well on a 780GTX.

[LordEC911]

In fact they did and they mentionned it :

http://www.hardware.fr/articles/910-...cole-test.html

They wait temperatures/frequencies stabilization to launch the bench. Room temperature is fixed @ 26 degrees celsius also, in order to give fair results accuracy.

That's not a GTX680 review... Nice try.

- show me a gtx 780 that cant to 1250mhz

I will show you every single GTX780 ever made.

Demoed on Titan, I don't think it would do so well on a 780GTX.

They don't need DP for that...
This was also showcased awhile ago, I wanna say last year, but I don't think they mentioned Flex.

[FU1G0R]

http://www.guru3d.com/news_story/gal...eet_leaks.html

[boxleitnerb]

That's not a GTX680 review... Nice try.

The GTX 680 only has Boost 1.0. And Boost 1.0 is barely temperature dependent. The pre-heating argument should only concern Boost 2.0 and Powertune Next cards, i.e. GTX 760, 770, 780, Titan, 780 Ti and 290 and 290X (and future cards that employ these Boosts).

[Olivon]

That's not a GTX680 review... Nice try.

U right. That's a 290X review with same testing conditions than 780/Titan cards.

[To(V)bo Co(V)bo]

I can confirm that NVIDIA has killed DP performance with the 780 Ti. Using 1/3 DP doesn't make financial sense, as either it means selling the card for $1500+ or hurting their own workstation market. I'm disappointed, I use 64 bit floating point operations and the old GTX 580 offers more power than the 780 Ti. Ah well.

Workstation cards don't even really utilize DP. DP is great for crunching numbers and scientific stuff, not so great for running CAD/CAM or rendering. That is why Nvidia segmented their professional VGA's. Quadro uses single precision and Tesla uses double precision. Thats how they force you to make 2 seperate costly purchases now. Fermi actually had a good balance of both.

[[XC] Oj101]

Workstation cards don't even really utilize DP. DP is great for crunching numbers and scientific stuff, not so great for running CAD/CAM or rendering. That is why Nvidia segmented their professional VGA's. Quadro uses single precision and Tesla uses double precision. Thats how they force you to make 2 seperate costly purchases now. Fermi actually had a good balance of both.

Sorry, I should have specified GPGPU use. I wasn't even thinking about Quadro when I made that post.

Fermi had a good balance of both but can't hold a candle to the GTX TITAN for either.