Quote Originally Posted by GoldenTiger View Post
As I told you on [H ]... it's hardly unbelievable. I've posted a followup for you to explain the pieces you're missing, if you are interested in that thread.
As I told you in [H], "architecturally imbalanced" is the biggest load of bull I've heard. What I DO believe is they used DIFFERENT DRIVERS for the testing. That is HARD, SOLID FACT. 40-50mHz clock differences (5% difference at most) do not balance out with 15+% architectural differences to give results that are 3-4% off. Why on earth would Nvidia release a Titan which has "more shaders than it needs"? They have some of the most brilliant engineers in the field, who just so happened to make the mistake of giving a card "too many shaders". Put away your green flag and look at the facts.