MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 383

Thread: AMD "Steamroller/Excavator" -info, speculations and experience

Threaded View

  1. #11
    all outta gum
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    3,390
    Good find Flanker and nice analysis informal

    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post

    Increase dispatch bandwidth to 8 INT ops per cycle (4 to each core), from 4 INT ops per cycle (4 to just 1 core). 4 ops per cycle per core remains unchanged. <-massive improvement in MT workload
    Looks to me more like extracting additional inctruction-level parallelism, not thread-level parallelism.
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post

    Change from 4 to 3 FP pipe stages. <- don't know what to think of this. It's listed as improvement so less stages is good(shorter pipeline usually means better IPC).
    Lower latency means same max theoretical IPC, but lower branch misprediction penalty, less waiting for the result of previous operations - should be a nice increase in real-world apps. Also this seems unusual - so far most architectures evolved from shorter to longer pipeline, not the other way.

    About the memory controllers: I hope the MC can work in both modes (DDR3 and GDDR5) and selects one mode at boot, similar to how Deneb had DDR2/DDR3 controller. Another possibility is selecting modes during packaging (blowing on-chip fuses), in which case SKUs will be locked to one or other type of memory, probably GDDR5 for mobile and ULV chips and DDR3 for desktop. I hope it's the previous, but the latter seems more likely.
    Last edited by G.Foyle; 03-08-2013 at 04:20 AM.
    www.teampclab.pl
    MOA 2009 Poland #2, AMD Black Ops 2010, MOA 2011 Poland #1, MOA 2011 EMEA #12

    Test bench: empty

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •