Quote Originally Posted by Stevethegreat View Post
And the question is : why -then- nvidia hasn't released it around that time to completely dominate the market given that AMD would had seemed to be unable to respond for -close to-two years in a row.

Is there a weird law against monopoly which would disable one of the competitors to release something that far better from competition? It seems senseless to me that nvidia gave the chance to AMD to breathe and even momentarily take the crown (driver update), what was the point of that?
Leading another company to bankruptcy in a 2 player battle ends the battle, and the winner doesn't really win anything ( anti-monopoly laws mainly )