Let's hope the price drops a bit, 975 is quite steep. 800 would be okay.
Let's hope the price drops a bit, 975 is quite steep. 800 would be okay.
Why would NVIDIA launch a product on a federal holiday in the States? The 18th is President's Day.Originally Posted by GoldenTiger
The claims are getting more and more ridiculous it seems. "Confirmed owners"? "I know someone who has a card"? Come on now.
Last edited by SKYMTL; 02-07-2013 at 05:17 AM.
Does sound a bit ridiculous to me... (the 18th). I was just copy-pasta'ing what the cart claims.
GeForce Titan like a president....
When i'm being paid i always do my job through.
GeForce Titan......BIG DOOOGG
WOOOOOF
After seeing a few specs being thrown about I figured I should share this:
Big ? is though, if the already available gk20x/gk110 is the same chip as the gf110...Code:K20x K20 Stream Processors 2688 2496 Core Clock 732MHz 706MHz Memory Clock 5.2GHz GDDR5 5.2GHz GDDR5 Memory Bus Width 384-bit 320-bit VRAM 6GB 5GB Single Precision 3.95 TFLOPS 3.52 TFLOPS Double Precision 1.31 TFLOPS (1/3) 1.17 TFLOPS (1/3) Transistor Count 7.1B 7.1B TDP 235W 225W Manufacturing Process TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm Architecture Kepler Kepler ROP 48 48? TMU 240 224? Dynamic Parallelism Hyper-Q Grid Management Unit NVIDIA GPUDirect Improved L2 Cache
I'm guessing it is, it's just weird though that the geforce card comes out after the quadro variant, it's strange because normally it's always vice versa.
The 680 really seems that it was a mid range card all this time ^^, at least to me it seems it was.
I totally wasted a bunch of money on the lightning 680 when I should of just waited it out just a few more months.
Ohwell, gonna be needing the new one now since the 680 pukes with AO or SGSSAA, or 3d vision (can't really game much at all with 3d vision's performance being 1/2 to 1/4 the speed of normal).
Last edited by NEOAethyr; 02-07-2013 at 05:38 AM.
ues these specs fits a card that is the true successor of 580
When i'm being paid i always do my job through.
I call shinaniganz on the 235W claim... Minimum 250W for a 550mm2 chip.
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
Remember that these cards aren't going to make use of tessellators or anything else that is only used in a graphics pipeline, as well as being clocked somewhat conservatively.
I have not heard anywhere that Titan will be cut off from its GPGPU/tesslator portions like the 680, in fact I heard the opposite? That the card will bring way more compute power to the table to beat 7970 on that end as well.
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
It would be stupid move for NV to have 580 beat the crap out of next two generations in gpgpu..
2x Dual E5 2670, 32 GB, Transcend SSD 256 GB, 2xSeagate Constellation ES 2TB, 1KW PSU
HP Envy 17" - i7 2630 QM, HD6850, 8 GB.
i7 3770, GF 650, 8 GB, Transcend SSD 256 GB, 6x3 TB. 850W PSU
Ah, my bad. I thought you were talking about K20X.
it has already been reported here?
http://www.overclockers.ru/hardnews/...nchmarkov.html
The card in the pic is a K-series part, not a GeForce product.
All the info is old and has already been proven wrong.
Donate to XS forums
New blurred pic on WCCFtech ....
:/
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
It's another fake, Nvidia doesn't use such VRMs. Looks like Zotac or MSI Lightning (possibly heavily photoshopped, but maybe not... I found a few similar looking PCB shots already).
Donate to XS forums
That picture looks terrible lol...
-PB
-Project Sakura-
Intel i7 860 @ 4.0Ghz, Asus Maximus III Formula, 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X F3 (@ 1600Mhz), 2x GTX 295 Quad SLI
2x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 RAID 0, OCZ ZX 1000W, NZXT Phantom (Pink), Dell SX2210T Touch Screen, Windows 8.1 Pro
Koolance RP-401X2 1.1 (w/ Swiftech MCP35X), XSPC EX420, XSPC X-Flow 240, DT Sniper, EK-FC 295s (w/ RAM Blocks), Enzotech M3F Mosfet+NB/SB
Yeah my first thought was it looked like a Lightning, not that I would know ... Imagine Nvidia turned to MSI to design it .... never happenIt's another fake, Nvidia doesn't use such VRMs. Looks like Zotac or MSI Lightning (possibly heavily photoshopped, but maybe not... I found a few similar looking PCB shots already
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
pconline.com
WOOOOOF
me Today 07:35 PM
you Today 08:12 PM
too late
WOOOOOF
Your link doesn't work, his does.me Today 07:35 PM
you Today 08:12 PM
too late
Donate to XS forums
That is a lot more believable score, which makes me think that it is correct.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
lolYour link doesn't work, his does.
WOOOOOF
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks