MMM
Page 7 of 14 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 348

Thread: AMD FX "Vishera" reviews info (again, after mod mistake)

  1. #151
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    Hey wez...
    Our chips seem to have come from the same batch (maybe even the same wafer ). Mine is a 1237 PGN, Serial #0126.

    I've been pushing the limits of stability quite a bit.
    Although it seems daily stable @ 4.95/1.50v (a # of different stress tests), I've since had a few quirks when encoding some HD video...

    Even though temps are in check my chip gets a little squirley whenever my Vcore is >1.485 (ambient water).
    I assume it's electron-migration... Just wondered if you've noticed the same thing with your chip?
    I've rolled my OC back to 4.83/1.48125 and the encoding stability problems seem to have went away...

    Don't get me wrong!
    I can push it up to 5.3+ Ghz with voltages >1.525 and pass a lot of benchmarks, but real stability fades ~1.485v.
    Maybe I just didn't get the best sample... Wouldn't be the first time...
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  2. #152
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Aland Islands, Finland
    Posts
    1,137
    Quote Originally Posted by Daveburt714 View Post
    Hey wez...
    Our chips seem to have come from the same batch (maybe even the same wafer ). Mine is a 1237 PGN, Serial #0126.

    I've been pushing the limits of stability quite a bit.
    Although it seems daily stable @ 4.95/1.50v (a # of different stress tests), I've since had a few quirks when encoding some HD video...

    Even though temps are in check my chip gets a little squirley whenever my Vcore is >1.485 (ambient water).
    I assume it's electron-migration... Just wondered if you've noticed the same thing with your chip?
    I've rolled my OC back to 4.83/1.48125 and the encoding stability problems seem to have went away...

    Don't get me wrong!
    I can push it up to 5.3+ Ghz with voltages >1.525 and pass a lot of benchmarks, but real stability fades ~1.485v.
    Maybe I just didn't get the best sample... Wouldn't be the first time...

    Hah, wafer brothers...

    I'll start with some ranting.. mostly motherboard related.
    Haven't focused too much on core clock with this chip yet, mainly because its nothing special in that area.
    Have noticed that I get ht ref fluctuations (~3), which sort of make things a bit tricky to dial in.
    Vcore is pretty wild, and in the first place I have to over compensate a lot to get set value at idle. But it will also increase by ~0.04v under load.
    Set it up for ~1.6v in bios, get 1.5v at idle and 1.54v under load.
    Now, its very much workable with some patience, and its mostly when really pushing it that these small issues pose a problem. But thats where i like it..so yea..

    Daily non prime stable limit is pretty much what you are getting (4.95ghz). Funny thing is, passing cine at over 5ghz have proven to be a real challenge. More and more my board seem to be the culprit, but its still hard to say. Could just as well be a super picky core that just dont want to play nice.

    If I want it stable in prime, ~4.8ghz is the limit, give or take. (Vcore around 1.5v, not 100% dialed in). My cooling just yawns its way through anything I've tried. High clocked 8 core chip with 1.56vcore and 1.36v cpunb, and load temp is barley reaching above 55C? My 8120's would have melted a long time ago lol. Socket and cores show similar values, so I dare to say temp is accurate enough. All voltages are measured with dmm.

    I've started using x264 fhd benchmark for a quick way of testing, and its not that far off from what it would take in prime. So I'm not surprised you are seeing issues with encoding
    You could very well be onto something with the chip not liking high vcore. Your chip have a high VID as well? (mine is 1.375v).
    Asus Crosshair IV Extreme
    AMD FX-8350
    AMD ref. HD 6950 2Gb x 2
    4x4Gb HyperX T1
    Corsair AX1200
    3 x Alphacool triple, 2 x Alphacool ATXP 6970/50, EK D5 dual top, EK Supreme HF

  3. #153
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    Quote Originally Posted by wez View Post
    I run 1.35-1.36v for 2650mhz imc on a 8350. I'd keep pushing as long as the freq keep scaling with voltage, and heat load can be kept under control/not sacrificing cpu core freq.

    Upping the voltage for nb/sb/ht can help with stability. Running high ht ref is generally where you'd notice a difference. And if you are getting weird crashes/bsods that you cant really figure out, a decent voltage bump on these might do the trick (++0.2v).

    Regarding VDDR, I haven't touched it when running vishera. But I'd be surprised if it did anything noticeable, at least with air/water.
    Yah for my 8120 I'm only at 1.2375v for CPU/nb
    For 2500mhz I guess vishera is different however I leave HT ref clock on auto
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  4. #154
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    687
    A question.
    So, a friend of mine who bought 8320 ,and me, were doing some quick comparisons clock for clock (at @3.5ghz)
    I was curious about a gain i would have when i switch, we did fritz ,convertxtodvd (encoder i often use) In fritz we about tied (i was a bit faster), in convertx he was noticably (around 17%) faster, all looked normal to me.
    But when we fired up linx, i got somewhat surprised.
    I got 61Gflops, he got half that.I checked around interwebz ,and the relation seems to be true.For second there i thought that smaller number means better, i checked intel scores, a 5ghz 2600k did same as my 3.5ghz phenom, so, i think not.
    Anyway, anyone could elaborate on this matter ? Why is that, what it actually does, how it compiles this number.I mean.Wth ?

    if anyones interested.
    Cinebench 11.5
    PH II 6.02
    8320 6.05 (with a 4.0 turbo, however i dont think it matters much in this test)
    Last edited by vario; 11-21-2012 at 04:15 PM.

  5. #155
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by vario View Post
    A question.
    So, a friend of mine who bought 8320 ,and me, were doing some quick comparisons clock for clock (at @3.5ghz)
    I was curious about a gain i would have when i switch, we did fritz ,convertxtodvd (encoder i often use) In fritz we about tied (i was a bit faster), in convertx he was noticably (around 17%) faster, all looked normal to me.
    But when we fired up linx, i got somewhat surprised.
    I got 61Gflops, he got half that.I checked around interwebz ,and the relation seems to be true.For second there i thought that smaller number means better, i checked intel scores, a 5ghz 2600k did same as my 3.5ghz phenom, so, i think not.
    Anyway, anyone could elaborate on this matter ? Why is that, what it actually does, how it compiles this number.I mean.Wth ?

    if anyones interested.
    Cinebench 11.5
    PH II 6.02
    8320 6.05 (with a 4.0 turbo, however i dont think it matters much in this test)
    The problem is zambezi/piledriver still has a single decode to 4 FlexFPU (FPU = floating point unit)
    while it is still executing the the full 128 bit of it for all 8 core it can only bring 2 way decoders to the cores and each side of Flexfpu and the Flexfpu is dual threaded to work with either core.

    Steamroller addresses this by giving it two 4 way decoders one to each integer and both decoders go to the FlexFPU since it's dual threaded.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  6. #156
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Linx is not supporting BD family of cores properly,that's why you see very low score there. It should be scoring roughly 2x of what he gets if Linx supported FMA ISA.
    Last edited by informal; 11-22-2012 at 10:45 AM. Reason: typo

  7. #157
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    687
    Thanks for quick replies, its quite strange to see such results, even sandy/ivybridge is much slower than phenom II in this.
    On a side note, prime errors out on stock with my friends 8320... Is this some kind of incompatibility ? (large ffts)

  8. #158
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  9. #159
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by vario View Post
    Thanks for quick replies, its quite strange to see such results, even sandy/ivybridge is much slower than phenom II in this.
    On a side note, prime errors out on stock with my friends 8320... Is this some kind of incompatibility ? (large ffts)
    Yeah there is some issue with prime and Bulldozer/PD. Just ignore it,everything is fine.

  10. #160
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brasil, S.P.
    Posts
    999
    990FXA-UD3 | FX8350@4.7Ghz | Asus HD7870 | 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2050Mhz 8-8-8-22 | AX850W |SSD Vertex3 Max IOPS 120GB | Auzentech Forte + TAPCO-S5

    EK Supreme Full-Gold | XSPC RX240 + EX120 | MCP35x | 3x Koolance Blue Led @PWM | Tygon Black 1/2 | Bitspower Compression | @ FM CM690 I

  11. #161
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    wez: The VID on my chip is 1.3625, so pretty close...

    This 8350 runs MUCH cooler than either of my 81xx's (lower power consumption too)!
    Like you, I'm still testing, but my chip does seem a little touchy when it comes to voltages.

    I'm nowhere near done yet, but I've worked my IMC quite a bit and scaling slows drastically ~2.5/1.25v even though temps are in check.
    I've pushed v's higher but with diminishing returns, could have something to do with high mem clocks I guess .

    The x264 FHD/Maxwell Render benchmarks seem to be really good stress tests for daily stability (hours of Prime95 just seems like overkill with these chips!).
    Then again Encoding video is the most stressful I do, and even they can fail when running RipBot/HandBrake...

    Tbone: Although it doesn't offer huge benefits (slight improvements in SSD scores & 3D benches), running HTLink speeds matched to the IMC hasn't caused any problems for me so far (unlike PHII/Thuban/BD).
    Keeping it 1 or 2x lower while finding max clocks is probably a good idea, but once you get things things stable you should be able to bring it up to the IMC speeds without failures...
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  12. #162
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,124
    What max bus speed average on these chips
    Currently running 236 and 3078 rated fsb 2800NB

  13. #163
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    is there a list of stable overclocks for the vishera (8350/8320) series?

    whats average 8320 overclock 4.6-4.8?
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  14. #164
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hopatcong, NJ
    Posts
    1,078
    My FX-6300 tops out at 4.5GHz @ 1.47v on IBT on Very High / Max. If it can pass that, it is considered 'stable' for me.
    My chip isnt very good, but I guess that is to be expected since FX-6300s are probably 8320 rejects, which dont clock as well as 8350s.

  15. #165
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    Quote Originally Posted by tbone8ty View Post
    is there a list of stable overclocks for the vishera (8350/8320) series?
    I haven't seen one on XS... I'm certainly not the best at pushing benchmarks, but I am pretty good at finding max stable OC's (for my gear/uses anyway).
    From what I've seen the 8350's tend to clock slightly better but it's still luck of the draw.
    My chip is average at best and it wouldn't surprise me to see a nice 8320 beat it, guess it just comes down to how important $30-40 is to you and how much a potential few Mhz matters...

    I've had this 8350 since their release and had what seemed "Daily Stable" ~4.95Ghz.
    After a few crashes while encoding HD video I had to back it down a little...

    Here's what I'm currently running for the last week or so, it's been very stable and hasn't failed even while doing multiple encodes...



    Here are some of my usual benches/stress tests at the above clocks (it's an old version of AIDA I don't have a modern key ):





    Quote Originally Posted by tbone8ty View Post
    whats average 8320 overclock 4.6-4.8?
    From what I've seen, with good cooling most chips should fall into that range...
    Personally, I'd be surprised if you couldn't get an 8320 stable @ 4.6 on aftermarket air!
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  16. #166
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    nice Dave, can you test for me stability in AMD Overdrive (there is stability test, looks good and stressed every part of CPU, uncore, RAM)? I testing AMD CPUs in this test. I dont much believe with newest CPUs PRIME (my i7-3770K was PRIME stable and sometimes crashed in idle or some benchmark!)
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  17. #167
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,124
    Had a full day playing around with 8350 up to yet 4.8 1.38vcore stable. Mem 2200MHz Cas 6-10-10-27-40 1T.

    Last edited by bro20000; 11-26-2012 at 03:30 PM.

  18. #168
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Pretty good.

    Have you tried 6-10-7 @ 2200?
    Smile

  19. #169
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,124
    Just tryed it thanx for tip mate

    Last edited by bro20000; 11-26-2012 at 05:44 PM.

  20. #170
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,124
    4.97Ghz X264 run


    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

  21. #171
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,124
    This chip is amazing 5.1Ghz X264 Run.Turning into a AMDfanboy lol.



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
    Last edited by bro20000; 11-27-2012 at 02:10 AM.

  22. #172
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Well that is some amazing OC for sure

  23. #173
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    wooow Bro! Whats your batch of CPU? Awesome run with still decent voltage!
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  24. #174
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,124
    Quote Originally Posted by FlanK3r View Post
    wooow Bro! Whats your batch of CPU? Awesome run with still decent voltage!

    I will have to let you know not checked batch number yet amazed by this chip. Currently running tests at 5.25 now

  25. #175
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brasil, S.P.
    Posts
    999
    8320 max clock around 5.1Ghz...
    990FXA-UD3 | FX8350@4.7Ghz | Asus HD7870 | 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2050Mhz 8-8-8-22 | AX850W |SSD Vertex3 Max IOPS 120GB | Auzentech Forte + TAPCO-S5

    EK Supreme Full-Gold | XSPC RX240 + EX120 | MCP35x | 3x Koolance Blue Led @PWM | Tygon Black 1/2 | Bitspower Compression | @ FM CM690 I

Page 7 of 14 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •