-
Registered User
Nice times and multi-core efficiency CRFX. I am curious why you(CRFX) ran x64 see3 kasumi code path as opposed to the x64 AVX Hina code path? Maybe they can release a FMA code path that would be even faster. (leaning towards FMA3 because it will be supported by future intel haswell and current Amd piledriver cores as opposed to FMA4 which is AMD bulldozer and piledriver only afaik but if it is not to hard to make both it would be cool to compare on piledriver and see whats faster FMA3 or FMA4)
Last edited by Utroz; 10-25-2012 at 04:48 AM.
Reason: typos
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks