Overall performance, you might be right that the SLC SSD is faster then the Samsung 840P especially server workloads etc, and sertainly in a non-TRIM OS as SLC rewrites much faster then MLC does. I've had a few X25-E's in my time, so I know the benefit of SLC and I would still own them if Intel did not screw me on TRIM..
However, an area the Samsung 840P looks to be faster and pretty substancially so, is random read QD(1)2-6, this is where my priority are as always. RR QD2-6 will not loose steam on the samsung when it's filled to an reasonable level (XS OS levels, sub 50-60%), Sandforce on the other hand do loose abit of steam on RR QD2-6 as it fills up to the same levels, don't know if this SLC edition is more resilliant, and won't find out myself as the SLC drive is nowhere to find in norway..
Would have liked to see the SuperSSpeed use another controller like the latest marvel, I think that would have been even more impressive, and it's not to late for that..
As for the linking between the reviewsite and this SSD in this manner, it might seem a little iffy imho, add the SuperSSpeed "talkup" by you, working for the same site, and a few eyebrowes might be raised on XSNo pun intended, just voicing my opinion, and I tend to love me a good conspiracy in the late night hours..
As for the SSD itself, it would, for that price, probably be in my box already if I could get one here, but the Samsung 840P will be here on the 15th and I want one.. I'm wondering why an SSD-maker like this again do not get it into the shelves in norway, we are buying SSD's like butter here, and have a few bucks to spend (!). This is a fiering offence by the resposible party imho...



No pun intended, just voicing my opinion, and I tend to love me a good conspiracy in the late night hours..
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks