I'd really like to have some benches in r13 cinebench AMD vs. Intel. If AMD really gets a +40% boost from newer cinema 4d engines, then this might be the change AMD was looking for.
If only cinebench, which represents an actuall app and new technology in contrast to SuperPi etc., would have recognized bulldozer and the correct renderpaths right at launch, the whole picture could have been different.
It would have been obvious, how powerful the new arch is besides its memory bandwidth, and it would have been obvious, that it is the software not using latest tech that slows down bully in games etc.
People would have said "ok, in games it runs in gpu limitation, and in apps i get more power with the latest tech. good processor at a good price. ok, downside is higher power consumption, but i get higher perf for that too, right?"
Now, 1 year after release, there are some very unpopular benches in linux environment that show bully can actually hold its ground, but much much more popular cinebench r11.5 which is the bench bully is worst looking in.
And the new cinebench not available anywhere...
If the rendering speed under cinema 4d R13 is truly +40% on bully/vishera, then we get 7.7 against like 8.3 CB Points R11.5 vs. R13 what is only 10% more points in R13. Now if doing the math, Intel points then must be lower in R13 CB then in R11.5... You did think the last thought about what would happen then to the AMD vs Intel discussion, not me
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks