Why didnt you quote my entire post? You see me saying the reasons there. Whats unclear to you? Do i need to make it GREEN for you to see better?
Im not being either green or red here. Simple facts from reviews say that GTX is bit better on 1920 and higher resolutions on overall. One post earlier i even posted the percentages. In DX11 games, the GTX is around 9% better in 1920 and only 4% better in 2560 resolutions with 8xAA/16AF used. The power draw is identical to 7970. That makes GTX a better performer per watt.
The reason i sayd 1:1 is because its rather similar perfoming card which came out nearly 4 months after the HD. Its not 16% better like some fans posted earlier. Not even close.
Dont tell me that in lower resolutions the difference is bigger. If you buy this card and play under full HD, then good luck to you!
Like i sayd before. AMD needs to drop 7970 price bit under the GTX and it will still be atractive to buyers. AMD has already sold a lot of cards in past months. Now they can afford a price cut.
What interests me a lot is how much costs the production of GTX 680 vs HD 7970. The GPU dye is big part of the overall cost, but its not everything. We may think that GTX should be cheaper to make, but im not 100% sure on that.




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks