Kepler Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

[LexDiamonds]

@ Vega-- Epic Fail is using quad 3gb 580s with only 6gb system ram....

[solofly]

@ Vega-- Epic Fail is using quad 3gb 580s with only 6gb system ram....

Mr Vega doesn't run that system anymore, he just forgot to change his sig...

[Levish]

2GB is epic fail. I use more than that on a single monitor with high res texture packs in many games. Forget about Surround users. Hopefully they come out with 4GB versions.

+1

2GB ... come on, only reason I'm waiting now is there is probably going to be a response price drop on the 7950/7970's
was expecting at a minimum another 1GB over my GTX 580.

[GoldenTiger]

2GB is epic fail. I use more than that on a single monitor with high res texture packs in many games. Forget about Surround users. Hopefully they come out with 4GB versions.

Yeah, I thought there were rumors of 4GB editions coming out. I'm tempted to wait for those... since I doubt they'll be here at launch . I "only" run 2560x1600 though so I'm hoping 2GB will be enough.

[TheBreezyBB]

Why does it smell like price fixing this generation?! Or is it just greed?

[zalbard]

2GB is epic fail. I use more than that on a single monitor with high res texture packs in many games. Forget about Surround users. Hopefully they come out with 4GB versions.

Another sign of a mid-range card...
They really haven't thought this through very well at all.

[highoctane]

It's not like there won't be a 4gb version, maybe not a launch but just like there where 3gb 580's there will be 4gb 680's available.

[GoldenTiger]

It's not like there won't be a 4gb version, maybe not a launch but just like there where 3gb 580's there will be 4gb 680's available.

/crosses fingers for "at launch". Not sure I really need it for 2560x1600 but I wouldn't mind having it.

[highoctane]

Yeah, I thought there were rumors of 4GB editions coming out. I'm tempted to wait for those... since I doubt they'll be here at launch . I "only" run 2560x1600 though so I'm hoping 2GB will be enough.

My monitor is 2560x1600 and the only game that I actually play that even has a chance of pushing over 2gb would be skyrim, I know there are a couple other games that can use allot as well but they can probably all be counted on less than two hands.

[Dami3n]

Hype is reaching epic levels,
148a.png
GeForce GTX 680 Up To 40% Faster Than Radeon HD 7970: NVIDIA
http://www.techpowerup.com/162305/Ge...70-NVIDIA.html

[DarthShader]

Compare:

[kaktus1907]

oh what a shocker

[GoldenTiger]

Compare:

LOL I know...

[RPGWiZaRD]

Haha, the new way of testing performance.... Note down Nvidia's official benchmark figures at a Nvidia presentation, test HD7970/7950 FPS numbers and apply the correct % to GK104. xD Only one prob, Nvidia's own numbers are always the "best case" scenario and won't reflect the truth. Oh well at least some1 wasn't sleeping at the meet at least.

[Andypro1]

Hype is reaching epic levels,
148a.png
GeForce GTX 680 Up To 40% Faster Than Radeon HD 7970: NVIDIA
http://www.techpowerup.com/162305/Ge...70-NVIDIA.html

Starting the y-axis at 80% is simply dishonest.

[iMacmatician]

Starting the x-axis at 80% is simply dishonest.

While I don't disagree, it's nothing new.

[G.Foyle]

Starting the x-axis at 80% is simply dishonest.

Starting the x-axis at 80% is the way it's meant to be played :P

[highoctane]

I think there is a subliminal message in the graphing, the graph is giving AMD the green middle finger, coincidental or planned hmmmmm.

148a.png
GeForce GTX 680 Up To 40% Faster Than Radeon HD 7970: NVIDIA
http://www.techpowerup.com/162305/Ge...70-NVIDIA.html

[AliG]

Yeah, I thought there were rumors of 4GB editions coming out. I'm tempted to wait for those... since I doubt they'll be here at launch . I "only" run 2560x1600 though so I'm hoping 2GB will be enough.

I apologize for getting off topic, but what monitor do you use? I'm looking to upgrade my current 24" lcd and frankly I don't want to downgrade to 16:9 from 16:10. I really like the full resolution Dell 27/30" but those cost a fortune lol

[Lanek]

Only looking on BF3 numbers should have give an hint.. +18% without AA, +42% with MSAA .... adding the result are based on the "slide" posted above.. should give the second.

[tbone8ty]

i cant imagine AMD would just be sitting by with idle hands.

i would guess that AMD would drop their entire gpu line up ~$50 for every model, i figured they already incorporated this $50 buffer since they were the first to market.

i cant wait to see these gpu prices just start tumbling and totally re-structure the market.

[AliG]

i cant imagine AMD would just be sitting by with idle hands.

i would guess that AMD would drop their entire gpu line up ~$50 for every model, i figured they already incorporated this $50 buffer since they were the first to market.

i cant wait to see these gpu prices just start tumbling and totally re-structure the market.

If Kepler is truly 40% faster than the 7970, I would assume they would also release a 7990 immediately after it or as soon as they can. I personally would prefer for a 7980 type card where it's just a significantly more powerful single gpu setup, but that doesn't fit in with their current platform

[GoldenTiger]

PC Perspective
11 minutes ago
Stay tuned, we'll have a quick preview of Kepler GPU performance on the mobile site coming later tonight!!

From (ugh) facebook.

[Handrox]

From (ugh) facebook.

Thx!

[kaktus1907]

From (ugh) facebook.

banana banana banana i was about to sleep lol