Kepler Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

[trinibwoy]

IMHO What Kyle is saying is, what everyone suspects, gk104 won't stand a chance against Tahiti in 2560x1600 gaming, let alone multi-monitor resolutions

And it won't matter either...

[Olivon]

Broke the news : 40% performance increase through the brush bios (As for you Believe it or not anyway, I believe)

http://www.redquasar.com/forum.php?m...hread&tid=7234

Thanks to AnarchX from 3DCenter krew. Great digger !



Press kit ?

[prava]

I beg to differ.

It is nearly impossible to play games like BF3, Skyrim (plus official texture pack), Batman AC and several other AAA titles with image quality maximized WITHOUT a flagship card at 2560.

Aren't you under NDA? If you aren't...Kepler launch may be not that soon as we think...

[FISKER_Q]

Aren't you under NDA? If you aren't...Kepler launch may be not that soon as we think...

Not sure what part of the NDA he breaks by saying the obvious, that you need a flagship card for the the >1920x1200 resolutions.

[GoldenTiger]

http://www.redquasar.com/forum.php?m...hread&tid=7234

Thanks to AnarchX from 3DCenter krew. Great digger !

[*img]http://tof.canardpc.com/view/32b4c0c0-1181-4e01-898a-818b31f1693b.jpg[/img]

Press kit ?

I'd seen the pic before (and yeah, probably press kit since I think w1zzard probably has his now from the sound of it), but this line I just saw elsewhere after you had posted it...

"Broke the news: 40% performance increase through the brush bios "
over original GK104 which was within 5% of the 7970 previously.

What is that supposed to mean? A new BIOS boosted the perf. from prior numbers?

Huh...

EDIT And yeah, that's a very good find.

[boxleitnerb]

As I said in another thread:
Maybe that 40% has to do with better OC that was made possible by a better fan control?

[GoldenTiger]

As I said in another thread:
Maybe that 40% has to do with better OC that was made possible by a better fan control?

Yeah, I think you have it right with that guess .

[Handrox]

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/show....php?p=2535013

Kyle from [H] got the fact wrong that GTX 680 will be slower than Radeon HD 7970 in 3DMark 11. I think Kyle later soon will finish upcoming GTX 680 review got the impression that GTX 680 is faster than Radeon HD 7970 and will switch to GTX 680 from Radeon HD 7970.

PHK got the first benchmark numbers in for 3DMark11 confirmed GTX 680 will be faster than Radeon HD 7970.

680-> X3200~3300
(7970)-> X2700~2800
670Ti -> X2500~2600
(7950) -> X2200~2300

PHK also mentioned that GTX 680 has max TDP 195W and fan will have low noise.

[MaddMuppet]

Impressive if true. It will make for a very interesting round if these are on the money.

[kaktus1907]

PHK doesnt say that..

680-> X3200~3300
(7970)-> X2700~2800
670Ti -> X2500~2600
(7950) -> X2200~2300

does it look like PHK to you

http://bbs.expreview.com/forum.php?m...&fromuid=57445

[GoldenTiger]

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/show....php?p=2535013

Kyle from [H] got the fact wrong that GTX 680 will be slower than Radeon HD 7970 in 3DMark 11. I think Kyle later soon will finish upcoming GTX 680 review got the impression that GTX 680 is faster than Radeon HD 7970 and will switch to GTX 680 from Radeon HD 7970.

PHK got the first benchmark numbers in for 3DMark11 confirmed GTX 680 will be faster than Radeon HD 7970.

680-> X3200~3300
(7970)-> X2700~2800
670Ti -> X2500~2600
(7950) -> X2200~2300

PHK also mentioned that GTX 680 has max TDP 195W and fan will have low noise.

Wow, that's impressive if correct. X3200 to 3300 is around a 1250c radeon 7970 in my rig. Now think of an oc on gk104..... and SLI.

[Gunslinger]

Wow, that's impressive if correct. X3200 to 3300 is around a 1250c radeon 7970 in my rig. Now think of an oc on gk104..... and SLI.

And FM HOF driver acceptance and valid links without disabling systeminfo.

[RPGWiZaRD]

And there my hopings to be able to buy a new GPU for 300 EUR or so or less goes finally down the drain haha, not even the slower model would be priced that low.... 350~380 EUR / $400 USD probably more like...

Based on these numbers I'd expect something like:

GTX 670 Ti ~$399 MSRP
GTX 680 499~$549 MSRP

[SimBy]

Wow, that's impressive if correct. X3200 to 3300 is around a 1250c radeon 7970 in my rig. Now think of an oc on gk104..... and SLI.

Your rig is kinda weak then.

85a3e34d-6442-4dc1-946a-5ebc4afe9b72.jpg

[GoldenTiger]

Not sure when 4.4ghz 2600k became weak, but uh, sure. Edit and that is with non bench settings, just normal gaming quality in driver. I am sure your extra cores provide more in 3dmark11 and the Mhz, not to mention high memory speed. Don't know what I would get with bench settings but.... my numbers seem in line with that rumor as my stock 7970 gave me the same thing. Oc was 1240c and 1550m.

[tbone8ty]

low stock + better than 7970 = $699

haha

[MaddMuppet]

low stock + better than 7970 = $699

haha

Surely not, if it's only the mid-range card.

[tajoh111]

Not sure when 4.4ghz 2600k became weak, but uh, sure. Edit and that is with non bench settings, just normal gaming quality in driver. I am sure your extra cores provide more in 3dmark11 and the Mhz, not to mention high memory speed. Don't know what I would get with bench settings but.... my numbers seem in line with that rumor as my stock 7970 gave me the same thing. Oc was 1240c and 1550m.

Don't feel bad Goldentiger. The six core does help and Simby score is unusually high for that speed. It actually third in the world overall on HWBOT.

http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark11_...=0#interval=20

Not to mention atleast in terms of 3dmark 2011 xtreme score, it probably the most higher efficient compared to anyone else on the list in terms of score and speed of GPU AND CPU.

Your score is more inline with everyone else out there.

[GoldenTiger]

Don't feel bad Goldentiger. The six core does help and Simby score is unusually high for that speed. It actually third in the world overall on HWBOT.

http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark11_...=0#interval=20

Not to mention atleast in terms of 3dmark 2011 xtreme score, it probably the most higher efficient compared to anyone else on the list in terms of score and speed of GPU AND CPU.

Your score is more inline with everyone else out there.

Thanks.... I am not ashamed to admit I was questioning my rig suddenly!

[prava]

Not sure what part of the NDA he breaks by saying the obvious, that you need a flagship card for the the >1920x1200 resolutions.

I thought NDA meant no comments whatsoever, on anything related in anyway to the topic SKYMTL has been kinda active in this discussion. So, if he doesn't return in a few days it could mean that he is on NDA.

[aussie-revhead]

Surely not, if it's only the mid-range card.

They will rename it 680 and charge appropriate prices, you will see.

[LordEC911]

I thought NDA meant no comments whatsoever, on anything related in anyway to the topic SKYMTL has been kinda active in this discussion. So, if he doesn't return in a few days it could mean that he is on NDA.

It really depends on the NDA.
You aren't allowed to talk about specifics that you have learned from the briefing/review samples.

[kuhla]

Has there been any new rumors about if it will stick to the 2 display limit of current individual Nvidia cards?

[GoldenTiger]

Has there been any new rumors about if it will stick to the 2 display limit of current individual Nvidia cards?

It won't by all current info.

[MaddMuppet]

It won't by all current info.

That was one of the most important features IMO. I also hope SLI is the same and not limited to just the 2 screens.