Kepler Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

[Mechanical Man]

Any source on that? Because I just tried Google and no luck. Everybody mentions Tri-SLI with PhysX, but no word on one card being used purely for PhysX.

It ran 4xMSAA last year, now it was FXAA (that would most likely allow single gtx580 to run it too). That removed memory bottleneck fermi had with the demo.. And i bet there has been a lot of other optimizations.

Basically, i cant see how it could be used other than to say, "it most likely is more powerful than fermi" but it cannot be used to even get idea how much.

[Lanek]

Is it only me that have the feeling that Nvidia delayed GK110 mostly because they saw GK104 would be enough to combat this series of AMD GPUs and will bring out GK110 to combat AMDs next refresh which would be a big win from Nvidias side (saves Nvidia plenty of time to better be able to focus on that next generation after Kepler) as there's no need for a "Kepler" refresh chip as GK110 will handle the next AMD update.

IMO if this is true would be that BIG WINNER what Charlie wrote about earlier haha.

Have you allready seen Nvidia who bring and have so much importance in the computing sectors, and have push so much in CUDA system... aim all around it ( quadro, Tesla ) .... aim all his communication about a "middle range " gamer " product now ? and nothing for Tesla, Quadro based Kepler ( who should double the Tflops available for computing ? ).

[LinkinParkBoy]

GK104 Graphics Card Pictured?

Could this be the very first picture of NVIDIA's GeForce Kepler 104-based graphics card? This Mr. Blurrycam shot has been doing rounds in Chinese forums. While it may not seem convincing at first glance, several features of the card in the picture seem to match the layout of the GK104 reference PCB which was pictured, earlier. To begin with, on the top-right corner you can train your eyes to a deep cutout, for the unusual piggy-backed 6+6 pin PCIe power connectors. The rear panel bracket is a 100% match (in layout and design of exhaust vents), of the one with the true-color image of the GK104 PCB. The only feature that clouds the plausibility of this picture is "GeForce GTX 670 Ti" being etched onto the cooler's shroud. We're hearing more voices refer to the top GK104 part as "GeForce GTX 680" than "GTX 670 Ti". We're also hearing that NVIDIA will adopt a new GeForce logo, so that glaring "GEFORCE" badge on the top of the card looks plausible.

[kaktus1907]

That's a fake photo from 570. It's been photoshoped and the job was done quite badly.

that would look good on my signature..
____________

here much cleaner shot

[Gilgamesh]

3Dcenter.org:
http://translate.google.it/translate...n&hl=&ie=UTF-8

[Olivon]

http://translate.google.fr/translate...ew-03082012%2F

[jam2k]

3Dcenter.org:

Old ing news

[LinkinParkBoy]

GK104 Dynamic Clock Adjustment Detailed

With its GeForce Kepler family, at least the higher-end parts, NVIDIA will introduce what it calls Dynamic Clock Adjustment, which adjusts the clock speeds of the GPU below, and above the base-line clock speeds, depending on the load. The approach to this would be similar to how CPU vendors do it (Intel Turbo Boost and AMD Turbo Core). Turning down clock speeds under low loads is not new to discrete GPUs, however, going above the base-line dynamically, is.

There is quite some confusion regarding NVIDIA continuing to use "hot clocks" with GK104, the theory for and against the notion have been enforced by conflicting reports, however we now know that punters with both views were looking at it from a binary viewpoint. The new Dynamic Clock Adjustment is similar and complementary to "hot clocks", but differs in that Kepler GPUs come with a large number of power plans (dozens), and operate taking into account load, temperature, and power consumption.


The baseline core clock of GK104's implementation will be similar to that of the GeForce GTX 480: 705 MHz, which clocks down to 300 MHz when the load is lowest, and the geometric domain (de facto "core") will clock up to 950 MHz on high load. The CUDA core clock domain (de facto "CUDA cores"), will not maintain a level of synchrony with the "core". It will independently clock itself all the way up to 1411 MHz, when the load is at 100%.

[Handrox]

[Kuroimaho]

[The Jesus]

We present to you... A 580 in an anti-static bag!

[GoldenTiger]

We present to you... A 580 in an anti-static bag!

Don't forget the big nVidia sticker!!!!!!!!

[RPGWiZaRD]

I see it now, woodscrews have been changed into anti-static bag, smart tactics!

[bill_d]

so why does he look like he is about to spit a loogie

[Andrea deluxe]

[GoldenTiger]

[*img]http://i.imgur.com/VMDiL.jpg[/img]

Quoted for truth!

[aussie-revhead]

That could be a block of wood as far as we know ..... Bring it Farken

[AliG]

That could be a block of wood as far as we know ..... Bring it Farken

I was actually going with brick, but wood works too

[The Jesus]

I was actually going with brick, but wood works too

Maybe that's why he made that face, he's straining to lift the brick.

[kuroikenshi]

Hummm where have I seen this situation before in the past...

[LexDiamonds]

Me Gusta

[xBanzai89]

Kyle expects the 680 to be faster at this point in time.

If and when we finally see the GK110 its likely going to be a monster performer. AMD may really have set the standard to low this time.

[Lanek]

http://www.techpowerup.com/162035/GK...-Detailed.html

I wish good luck for reviewers for bench the card, know at what speed is running the card, and what happend during this time.. is the card at 750-780-800-900? what will be the result if you bench the card after 1 hour of play ? will it be the same after the card got high heat? Is it OC by App for gain some fps in benchmark, is the result will be the same when someone play 1hour of BF3? Does it detect games benchmark and adapt the OC profile, but is it working the same when gaming ?

[kuroikenshi]

Kyle expects the 680 to be faster at this point in time.

If and when we finally see the GK110 its likely going to be a monster performer. AMD may really have set the standard to low this time.

That post by Kyle said nothing about what you just posted.

[xBanzai89]

I summarized what he said in the link part and what is going to be the case when the GK110 most likely. If the GK104 is similar to the 560 Ti vs 580 anyway.