Haven't we seen that info before and now it's just nicely put into a table or?
Anyway from a quick glimpse, those specs looks to be the most realistic that's been presented so far. It's just one thing I find a little amusing, when you compare which cards have 1.5GB/1.75GB VRAM vs 2GB VRAM. :P Well GTX 660 looks like a very good bang-for-buck card that I've been waiting for.
550m² sounds like very large for GK110 though, I can't help wondering what power consumption on a 550m² / 6.4B transistor card would be like. :o The efficiency better be good or we are probably around ~300W barrier but I'd personally bet it's more like 280W.
Oh well I hope at least the GK104 specs are true, Nvidia would sell a lot of those cards no doubt and at 290mm² which is relatively small for Nvidia and probably not too huge TDP rating, maybe 175~189W'ish that I also hope overclocks nicely (I'm thinking up to like 1050~1100MHz ofc depending on the ability to tweak the voltage), the Nvidia could have a big winner there.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks