lol yes sorry, i have allready corrected my post.. As i said, it happend offtly constructor do it for thermal demand or Power consumption... but dont forget this was on an exposition model ..
If the card die shrinked in 28nm, or with a better quality 40nm process, why dont keep the same clock ? and just take the increase of perf ? can be for meet a particular tdp ( Nvidia or Samsung ).
We hope Kepler have increase perf/clock ( and this will be logic ) .. But without a benchmark, this is a bit hard to say this is why this difference on clock.
Bookmarks