Results 1 to 25 of 53

Thread: [XFastest] Puts different boards through VRM heat test, which will burn first?

Threaded View

  1. #11
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Raja@ASUS View Post
    Which has not relation to capacitance at all. And seeing this thread is about X79, we had OTP and OCP implemented properly on our boards from the get-go, so you cannot push them "out of spec" to the point of failure.
    Not enough capacitance on either side of the fet could allow for out of spec operation dependent on the implementation method and BIOS settings. As was stated earlier though, the capacitance issue is more of a general issue and was not meant to be the "end all be all" statement nor to point to it being the largest of the issues or the cause of the fets entering cascade, only that due to the implementation methods used it is an issue.

    You monitor each fet separately? I highly doubt that.

    Do you even know how the monitoring functions of the drivers and fets work? If one fet enters a cascade scenario there is almost no method of reliably saving it from damage, let alone outright failure.
    Last edited by STEvil; 12-30-2011 at 01:50 AM.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •