Quote Originally Posted by Tomasis View Post
beautiful life irony!

the kid plays amd engineer and writes BIG LETTERS to prove his intelligence with green behaviour.

Im sure the thread would be better if we had sensible discussion. I dont think I needed to be called out if I thanked a guy for an opinion.

Again I say, all have different opinions and it is no need to attack even you dont disagree with other. Just to agree to disagree. Thats all.
You PM'ed me today, I replied back.
How about you stop judging me due to my age, assuming I think I know everything and looking at my behaviour from an opposite standpoint.
Everything you need to know about me, even my views on life and where I stand as a person will be in your inbox, thanks.

Quote Originally Posted by TESKATLIPOKA View Post
BeepBeep2 BD's performance and frequencies are not what i was waiting for and lower IPC than K10 was also a cold shower for me, after so many statements about better IPC
If you compare at the same thread count and don't look at Llano then K10 is really better than BD and I have no problem acknowledging that because K10 has higher IPC and no penalty from sharing.
examples
4 threads Deneb 980 is 15% faster than FX 4100
6 threads Thuban 1100 is 10% faster than FX 6100
link as proof
http://translate.googleusercontent.c...Qk--HLUQ2nZIsw


Which one do you mean? Piledriver core with L3 or without L3 in Trinity.
Higher clocks for sure and I would like to see at least the same IPC as Thuban for Trinity piledriver but who knows, the info from Chinese about perf in Cinebench would suggest ~10% IPC improvement and that is a lot considering Trinity doesn't have 8MB L3 cache but its suspicious. I hope we can see some more leaks before new year.
Thanks for being reasonable with my argument...unlike Tomasis, with essential name calling and looking down upon myself as a lesser being due to my age. Hopefully he will take back his comments after reading my PM, he is being as equally insensible as I.

Piledriver with L3, the replacement for Orochi OR without in Trinity is alright with me. Since Trinity is closer, why don't we start the train up again with that. I'd like to see a 10% IPC improvement for sure. Couple that with a bit more clockspeed and better performance per watt and I'll start seeing this architecture as something useful instead of a waste of money. Right now AMD can not compete with the old arch. in single threads, and unfortunately that arch couldn't compete with intel...

Hopefully Trinity leaks out faster than Orochi did, or at least from more credible sources :p That "O" guy was right...had we believed leaks, children like I would not have been so butthurt

I apologize to everyone for derailing this thread, though it takes two (or more!) men to start a fight.