+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 48 FirstFirst ... 4 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 24 ... LastLast
Results 326 to 350 of 1198

Thread: AMD "Piledriver" refresh of Zambezi - info, speculations, test, fans

  1. #326
    Xtreme Addict muzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    MA.
    Posts
    1,925
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Look at the results of Multi GPU tests....
    Results aren't good, THOSE are the folks looking for maximum performance, and are willing to spend the cash on top tier cpus.

    Just sayin'
    Hoping for MUCH better from PD.

    Come on AMD, you can do better than this!

  2. #327
    I am Xtreme BeepBeep2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,187
    Thanks
    361
    Thanked 127 Times in 106 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by muzz View Post
    Look at the results of Multi GPU tests....
    Results aren't good, THOSE are the folks looking for maximum performance, and are willing to spend the cash on top tier cpus.

    Just sayin'
    Good point.

    FX-8150 being $270, it's not exactly a cheap CPU and SB obliterates any hope for it and PD when overclocked in that area.

  3. #328
    Xtreme Cruncher informal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5,998
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 88 Times in 58 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by muzz View Post
    Look at the results of Multi GPU tests....
    Results aren't good, THOSE are the folks looking for maximum performance, and are willing to spend the cash on top tier cpus.

    Just sayin'
    Here you go,end user results with pair of OCed 6990. If BD can't bottleneck a pair of these monsters it won't be a bad CPU.
    http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2217355

  4. #329
    Xtreme Addict Olivon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,316
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked 209 Times in 117 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Here you go,end user results with pair of OCed 6990. If BD can't bottleneck a pair of these monsters it won't be a bad CPU.
    http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2217355
    Lol, you're so funny informal ...
    We all know that BD is an awful gaming CPU, they're plenty reviewz on the net from trusties respected sites.
    But you, not ...
    You prefer using a chart with 1 game on it, done by an 8's post guy on AT forum who is doing promo for his own amdfx.blogspot.com ...

    You really think we're stupid ?

  5. #330
    Xtreme Addict Smartidiot89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    AMD disclosed the IPC improvement to THG awhile back. They stated a third of 15% improvement PD will bring over BD will be IPC(so 5%), while two thirds will be power improvement(read more clock within same TDP). So the 10% in the slide must be clock+IPC over Bulldozer "8C" at undisclosed clock (maybe 8150 or 8170,where the later one is more logical choice as PD will come right after this part).
    We still may see an additional boost of 3-7% in less multithreaded apps( thread count lower than 8) , as per Microsoft. The patch will come with 8170 or a bit sooner.
    Got a link to this? Doesn't sound anything near from what I've heard.
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  6. #331
    Xtreme Addict muzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    MA.
    Posts
    1,925
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Thank You

    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    Lol, you're so funny informal ...
    We all know that BD is an awful gaming CPU, they're plenty reviewz on the net from trusties respected sites.
    But you, not ...
    You prefer using a chart with 1 game on it, done by an 8's post guy on AT forum who is doing promo for his own amdfx.blogspot.com ...

    You really think we're stupid ?
    Hoping for MUCH better from PD.

    Come on AMD, you can do better than this!

  7. #332
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    i wonder about AMD A10 APU with Piledriver Cores. A friend tell me it park with 2 Modules and 384 Stream Processor VLIW4. Good to go?

  8. #333
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Slovakia
    Posts
    169
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Smartidiot89
    Got a link to this? Doesn't sound anything near from what I've heard.
    The info is from Anand and AMD slides if I am not mistaken they can be found in this thread at the beginning.
    What did you hear? If I remember correctly you said you heard something about 15% will be just from IPC or am I wrong?

    About BD and gaming. Techpowerup did a comparision between SB,BD and Nehalem on Radeon 7970. Here is the link:
    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...Scaling/1.html
    Last edited by TESKATLIPOKA; 01-07-2012 at 09:05 AM.

  9. #334
    Xtreme Cruncher informal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5,998
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 88 Times in 58 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    Got a link to this? Doesn't sound anything near from what I've heard.
    It's on this page from THG article:
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...fx,3043-9.html

  10. #335
    I am Xtreme BeepBeep2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,187
    Thanks
    361
    Thanked 127 Times in 106 Posts
    @informal
    In most situations FX loses to Phenom II X6 and even Phenom II X4 980 in gaming as well as overclocked. No need to make BD out to be a gaming monster, we all know it's a failure.

  11. #336
    Xtreme Cruncher informal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5,998
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 88 Times in 58 Posts
    It's not a monster at all. It's just good enough. There is no question that i7/i5 is better. As for Phenoms,they are just not THAT better than FX,that's all.
    It's not like in Cyrix time when it was totally useless for gaming while K6 and Celerons were great in this tasks(while Cyrix was again faster in pure integer workloads,it only had a poor FPU).

  12. #337
    Xtreme Addict Oese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,202
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    different with the test informal posted is actually the ddr-2200 cl7 ram. That makes a difference over these crappy cl8 1333 that are used elsewhere for BD benching

    dunno if it changes anything tho, but i guess there are games that are not cpu nor gpu limited but ram. I have a good experience with the BD over my x6 in my unoptimized, oldfashioned but alltime favorite game, that improved a lot.
    1. ASUS Sabertooth 990fx | FX 8320 || 2. DFI DK 790FXB-M3H5 | X4 810
    8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3-2000 9-10-10-28 || 4GB PSC DDR3-1333 6-7-6-21
    Corsair TX750W | Sapphire 6970 2GB || BeQuiet PurePower 450w | HD 4850
    EK Supreme | AC aquagratix | Laing Pro | MoRa 2 || Aircooled

  13. #338
    I am Xtreme BeepBeep2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,187
    Thanks
    361
    Thanked 127 Times in 106 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Oese View Post
    different with the test informal posted is actually the ddr-2200 cl7 ram. That makes a difference over these crappy cl8 1333 that are used elsewhere for BD benching

    dunno if it changes anything tho, but i guess there are games that are not cpu nor gpu limited but ram. I have a good experience with the BD over my x6 in my unoptimized, oldfashioned but alltime favorite game, that improved a lot.
    realistically the difference in gaming is 2-3 FPS or none in some games

  14. #339
    Xtreme Addict Oese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,202
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    thats about what is seen as difference on some gaming tests anyway at resolution > 1024x860 except some singlethreaded games.

    No sugarcoat, but thats what it is, good enough...

    Anyway, this is PD thread, looking forward to it
    1. ASUS Sabertooth 990fx | FX 8320 || 2. DFI DK 790FXB-M3H5 | X4 810
    8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3-2000 9-10-10-28 || 4GB PSC DDR3-1333 6-7-6-21
    Corsair TX750W | Sapphire 6970 2GB || BeQuiet PurePower 450w | HD 4850
    EK Supreme | AC aquagratix | Laing Pro | MoRa 2 || Aircooled

  15. #340
    Xtreme Addict Tomasis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,220
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    the size of the 2 PD cores is really small, so hopefully this means we shall soon see 10 core non L3 chips with great turbo clocks and maybe some extra single threaded perf.
    it'd be nice!

    If next version of trinity (not PD) bases on GCN, it would be good htpc that does anything you throw at. Instead of cpu they uses raw Gpu power for heavier loads when we get new softwares for that (it takes long time i guess). I saw Boxx machine calculating Vray 3d in almost real time using Nvidia Cuda on Quadro/Tesla cards. Alone for that workload, cpu is not close to that tflop calculation power (not even a hundred high end as Intel 39xx can compete to triple/quad sli cards).

    I believe more on GPU in future. It is taking more care of heavy load, at the same time cpu is getting less imporant. What we need is high clocked ,leaner, smaller cpu that does required work between ram,nb and card.

    the future looks interesting
    Vishera 8320@ 5ghz | Gigabyte UD3 | 8gb TridentX 2400 c10| Powercolor 6850 | Thermalight Silver Arrow (bench Super KAZE 3k) | Samsung 830 128gbx2 Raid 0| Fractal case

  16. #341
    Xtreme Addict Alex-Ro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,031
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 41 Times in 31 Posts
    Well yeah,but that smaller and fater cpu is SB no way bulldozer.SB is fast as hell,super optimized IMC.Not that thing called bulldozer,which costs the same,consumes more power,and is damn ineffective..

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Alex-Ro For This Useful Post:


  18. #342
    I am Xtreme BeepBeep2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,187
    Thanks
    361
    Thanked 127 Times in 106 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Oese View Post
    thats about what is seen as difference on some gaming tests anyway at resolution > 1024x860 except some singlethreaded games.

    No sugarcoat, but thats what it is, good enough...

    Anyway, this is PD thread, looking forward to it
    Actually a lot of games separate BD and SB by 10FPS+, and BD is often 1-5 FPS behind Phenom II stock/overclocked, despite Phenom II's IMC being 60% slower.

  19. #343
    Xtreme Addict Oese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,202
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    mhm k
    1. ASUS Sabertooth 990fx | FX 8320 || 2. DFI DK 790FXB-M3H5 | X4 810
    8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3-2000 9-10-10-28 || 4GB PSC DDR3-1333 6-7-6-21
    Corsair TX750W | Sapphire 6970 2GB || BeQuiet PurePower 450w | HD 4850
    EK Supreme | AC aquagratix | Laing Pro | MoRa 2 || Aircooled

  20. #344
    I am Xtreme BeepBeep2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,187
    Thanks
    361
    Thanked 127 Times in 106 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Oese View Post
    mhm k



    In the games where FPS difference is 2-4 FPS, memory isn't going to do anything. (Besides, memory was equal on all systems except Nehalem which was in triple channel but 1066 instead of 1333)
    Last edited by BeepBeep2; 01-08-2012 at 12:55 PM.

  21. #345
    Xtreme Addict Oese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,202
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Ye i saw it. looks horrible
    1. ASUS Sabertooth 990fx | FX 8320 || 2. DFI DK 790FXB-M3H5 | X4 810
    8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3-2000 9-10-10-28 || 4GB PSC DDR3-1333 6-7-6-21
    Corsair TX750W | Sapphire 6970 2GB || BeQuiet PurePower 450w | HD 4850
    EK Supreme | AC aquagratix | Laing Pro | MoRa 2 || Aircooled

  22. #346
    Xtreme Addict Smartidiot89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    It's on this page from THG article:
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...fx,3043-9.html
    That is again from the same brief I heard, so I heard the same information as TomsHardware but it looks like you can interpret it both ways...
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  23. #347
    Xtreme Cruncher Plywood99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    978
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
    I don't get you guys. This thread is about Piledriver, and you're ragging on Bulldozer. Bulldozer may not be the greatest thing since sliced bread, but it's far from the worst also. I've had a TON of fun tweaking it and just playing around. And it actually runs great.
    I built a "Budget" BD system and it has been rock solid for me. I love it. Yes I've read all the "reviews" out there and what not. Frankly I don't much care. I go for how it feels. And BD is feeling mighty fun atm.

    And I cant wait to see what Piledriver does, should be better than the Phenom - Phenom II advances.

    Friggen relax guys, have a shot of vodka and chill and enjoy tweaking and benching and having fun.

    Yeah I'm bout halfway through a bottle right now and feeling mighty fine. Till I started reading all the emo crap in this thread.

    Lol, took like 30 mins to type this post.

    Peace

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Plywood99 For This Useful Post:


  25. #348
    Xtreme Addict Oese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,202
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    you know, the might of excel bars.... enjoying bd much also but you are right too in the aspect that this is offtopic... just, waiting for pd
    1. ASUS Sabertooth 990fx | FX 8320 || 2. DFI DK 790FXB-M3H5 | X4 810
    8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3-2000 9-10-10-28 || 4GB PSC DDR3-1333 6-7-6-21
    Corsair TX750W | Sapphire 6970 2GB || BeQuiet PurePower 450w | HD 4850
    EK Supreme | AC aquagratix | Laing Pro | MoRa 2 || Aircooled

  26. #349
    Xtreme Enthusiast Evantaur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    556
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 93 Times in 24 Posts
    Well i sure love vodka!

    I like large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate

  27. #350
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    15,361
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 120 Times in 74 Posts
    What is the current projected release date of PD? I've seen so many dates I'm
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    And put that GPU to work too! Fold for XS
    Main PC: Intel Core-i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 8GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 7 Pro x64, water - ONLINE
    Office PC: Intel C2D e8400 @ 3.0GHz, 4GB DDR2-800, GeForce GTS 250, Win 7 Pro x64, air - ONLINE
    Dedicated: DP Intel Xeon LV Sossaman @ 2GHz, 4GB DDR2-400 ECC, Win XP Pro, air - ONLINE
    Family PC: Intel C2D e8500 @ 3.2GHz, 3GB DDR2-667, Radeon X1300, Win 7 Home x64, air - ONLINE


+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 48 FirstFirst ... 4 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 24 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts