Quote Originally Posted by TESKATLIPOKA View Post
Some interesting slides from domaninhaber video, my thanks goes to del42sa from pctuning.cz forum
http://img7.rajce.idnes.cz/d0703/5/5...es/Trinity.jpg
http://img7.rajce.idnes.cz/d0703/5/5...ty_3D_mark.jpg
http://img7.rajce.idnes.cz/d0703/5/5...ty_PC_Mark.jpg
http://img7.rajce.idnes.cz/d0703/5/5...ty_Compute.jpg
http://img7.rajce.idnes.cz/d0703/5/5...al_graphic.jpg
http://img7.rajce.idnes.cz/d0703/5/5...al_graphic.jpg
Honestly I don't know what to think, if you look at the IGP performance in FLOPs
Llano 415 GFLOPs
Trinity 715 GFLOPs
Llano theoretical numbers
5SIMD * 16ALU*5SP*2*600MHz=480GFLOPs
415GFLOPs/480GFLOPs = 86.5%
and now Trinity
715/0.865=827GFLOPs
That should mean 10SIMDs VLIW4 at 646Mhz.
Thats impossible, they wouldn't be able to feed it with data, ~half of the TDP would be just for IGP and the performance in 3D mark doesn't match either. It wouldn't be stronger by just 35% but rather 1.8-2x. Even die size would be bigger compared to Llano's, maybe ~270-280mm2.

edit: my mistake, the FLOPs should be CPU+IGP but even so It doesn't match by a long shot.

P.S. Undone was faster
I think, these scores are plausible, unless someone tell me these result are unofficial and are given by some NDAers/testers.